<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Great Moments in the War Against DMCA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2006/11/03/great-moments-in-the-war-against-dmca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2006/11/03/great-moments-in-the-war-against-dmca/</link>
	<description>Your source for technology culture, internet phenomena, politics, interviews and entertainment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:41:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MeanDean</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2006/11/03/great-moments-in-the-war-against-dmca/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>MeanDean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 21:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/?p=50#comment-286</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, Scientology and the DMCA.  Moxon &amp; Kobrin, the CoS&#039;s law firm in Los Angeles, issued so many takedown notices to sites critical of Scientology that they became known in critic circles as &quot;Avagrams&quot;, for the lawyer, Ava Paquette, who was the signing issuer of the notices.  I probably received about a dozen myself, when I was active as a Scn critic. 

(The content I posted is no longer up, thanks to a dimwit at a former ISP who, apparently terrified at receiving an honest-to-Xenu letter from an attorney, provided my PERSONAL INFORMATION to Moxon &amp; Kobrin.  As many longtime vocal critics can attest, having the CoS (a) not like you, and (b) have your home address etc. can put a serious crimp in how you live your day-to-day life.)

So yeah, the DMCA is poorly-written legislation that creates a &quot;guilty until proven innocent&quot; atmosphere for anyone putting content on the web. Knowing a psycho like Michael Crook had my personal information would make me start spending money on ammunition down at Big Five...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, Scientology and the DMCA.  Moxon &amp; Kobrin, the CoS&#8217;s law firm in Los Angeles, issued so many takedown notices to sites critical of Scientology that they became known in critic circles as &#8220;Avagrams&#8221;, for the lawyer, Ava Paquette, who was the signing issuer of the notices.  I probably received about a dozen myself, when I was active as a Scn critic. </p>
<p>(The content I posted is no longer up, thanks to a dimwit at a former ISP who, apparently terrified at receiving an honest-to-Xenu letter from an attorney, provided my PERSONAL INFORMATION to Moxon &amp; Kobrin.  As many longtime vocal critics can attest, having the CoS (a) not like you, and (b) have your home address etc. can put a serious crimp in how you live your day-to-day life.)</p>
<p>So yeah, the DMCA is poorly-written legislation that creates a &#8220;guilty until proven innocent&#8221; atmosphere for anyone putting content on the web. Knowing a psycho like Michael Crook had my personal information would make me start spending money on ammunition down at Big Five&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
