Comments on: ‘How I Sued a Craigslist Sex Troll’

By: Floating Shelves %0A

Floating Shelves %0A — Thu, 25 Nov 2010 04:56:11 +0000

somtimes i also sell stuffs on craigslists because there are many users in it ;”;

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 01 Nov 2010 01:47:16 +0000

i admire Craig Newark of craiglists because he became a milionaire in such a short time .

By: Mike Mirron

Mike Mirron — Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:34:50 +0000

@jjbunt: Hahahahaha, good call.

Well, act like an idiot on the internet, pay the price. It always catches up to you.

By: Morning Links / Sometimes Right

Morning Links / Sometimes Right — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:04:10 +0000

[...] "How I Sued a Craigslist Sex Troll" [...]

By: jjbunt

jjbunt — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:41:07 +0000

I always knew that someday his excuse of “I used the photo for satire, it’s FAIR USE!” would come back to bite him in the ass.
Fair use doesn’t apply when you are using the photos to taunt, harass and stalk people.

For those who responded to his ad, I am sure that you know this already, but… Next time, get old school, go to a bar, get drunk, get another gal drunk and take her back to your place etc., it’s easier and usually works.

By: Tohbin Murat

Tohbin Murat — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 02:19:33 +0000

Kathleen said “which makes me quite leery of all men in general”

Kathleen, there are normal men and there are crazy men. There are normal women, and there are crazy women.

Please do not express misandrist sentiment.

Anyhow, on one level I agree that it was very naïve to respond to the Craiglist ad. But the legal burden and moral burden fell on Fortuny. He could have simply responded back saying “Just kidding – I am not really who I said I was. Please don’t send confidential details to strangers.”

Instead he chose a different path. His failure of understanding of the word “integrity” lead to his downfall.

By: TrollFail

TrollFail — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:14:36 +0000

Anyone DUMB ENOUGH to send naked pictures to some email address on CL deserves what they get. Are you such a lazy broke ass that you can’t join one of million hookup sites ou there? But I do agree with Kaleo, repeatedly reposting stuff once it was flagged is sort of over the line.

By: Richard

Richard — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:37:23 +0000

Good riddance. There are so many pranksters and scams on the internet, hopefully this will send out the correct warnings to people who try to scam people. It just wastes to much of other people´s time who are seriously trying to find infomation on theinternet.

By: Kathleen

Kathleen — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 04:42:56 +0000

It is too bad that Fortuny posted explictly identifying info, but what is really sad is the amount of pure hatred that all those “nice” guys expressed towards females. It went way beyond “kinky”. Yet more evidence which makes me quite leery of all men in general, since most of them looked like they could be any guy I know.

By: Kaleo

Kaleo — Fri, 15 May 2009 05:27:06 +0000

Much to my surprise, I find myself siding with Fortuny but only to the extent of his initial post. I’d call it performance art or something. But, repeatedly reposting deleted material crosses over into malicious harassment.

By: Jason Fortuny To Pay $75K In Damages For Craigslist Experiment

Jason Fortuny To Pay $75K In Damages For Craigslist Experiment — Wed, 13 May 2009 22:02:40 +0000

[...] UPDATE: 10 Zen Monkeys interviewed the guy who sued Jason Fortuny. [...]

By: Craigslist Victim/Plaintiff’s First Interview ~ Windows Fanatics

Craigslist Victim/Plaintiff’s First Interview ~ Windows Fanatics — Mon, 11 May 2009 19:45:41 +0000

[...] thought you might want to blog this. How I Sued a Craigslist Sex Troll includes the first interviews from both the lawyer and plaintiff in the first successful lawsuit [...]

By: Womble

Womble — Sat, 09 May 2009 16:20:05 +0000

Karma is a bitch, ain’t it? Maybe Fortuny can pay off the debt by advertising his services on craigslist.

By: Dai Jones

Dai Jones — Sat, 09 May 2009 03:28:20 +0000

A tricky one. But on balance, I can’t help but feel “caveat emptor”. Don’t pass around confidential info on the web, and if you do don’t be surprised to see it again in contexts you don’t expect.

By: no

no — Sat, 09 May 2009 02:05:46 +0000

This was enjoyable bothways. Darwinism at work

By: Gargantuan

Gargantuan — Fri, 08 May 2009 15:19:41 +0000

Result!