<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>10 Zen Monkeys &#187; Video Fun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/category/video-fun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com</link>
	<description>Your source for technology culture, internet phenomena, politics, interviews and entertainment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 15:19:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Transhumanist Salvation or Judgment Day?</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2009/06/30/transhumanist-salvation-or-judgment-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2009/06/30/transhumanist-salvation-or-judgment-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lou Cabron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/?p=305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What happens when humans can really merge with robots, and there's real nanotechnology? R.U. Sirius confronts the ultimate question: will technology save humankind &#8212; or destroy it?
<strong>By&#160;Lou&#160;Cabron</strong><br/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.mondoglobo.net/images/Transhumanist%20Robot%20Judgment%20Day.jpg" width=468>	
<br/><br/>
<strong>We're starting to brush up against</strong> real robots, real nanotech, and maybe even the first real artificial intelligence. But will emerging technologies destroy humankind &mdash; or will humankind be saved by an emerging transhumanism?
<br/><br/>
And which answer is more liberating?
<br/><br/>
If anybody knows, it's R.U. Sirius. The former editor in chief at <em>Mondo 2000</em> (and a Timothy Leary expert) has teamed up with "Better Humans LLC." They're producing <a href="http://www.hplusmagazine.com/digitaledition/2009-summer/">a new transhumanist magazine</A> called <em>h+</em>. (And R.U. is also one of the head monkeys at <em>10 Zen Monkeys</em>.) But can he answer this ultimate question?  <em>
Terminator Salvation</em> played with questions about where technology ends and humanity begins. 
<br/><br/>
But what will we do when we're confronting the same questions in 
real life?

<br/><br/>
<strong>10 Zen Monkeys:</strong>  Isn't this whole idea of real transhumanism kind of scary?
<br/><br/> 
<strong>RU SIRIUS:  </strong>Everything's scary.  Human beings weren't born to be wild so much as we were born to be scared, starting on a savanna in Africa as hunter-gatherers watching out for lions and tigers and bears (oh my...  Okay, maybe just lions), subjected to the random cruelties of a Darwinian planet.  I would say that the transhumanist project is probably an attempt to use human ingenuity to make living in this situation as not scary as possible, and in some theories, to actually change the situation, to create a post-Darwinian era.  <br/><br/>
<div class="breakout">
<div class="breakhead">See Also</div>
<div class="breakcontent">
&raquo; <a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/digitaledition/2009-summer/">Read <em>h+</em> magazine online</A><br/>
&raquo; <a href="http://cp.revolio.com/issue/393">Read the first issue</A><br/>
&raquo; <a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/magazine/2009/spring-2009">"Is the Future Cancelled?"</A><br/>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/magazine/2009/spring-2009">Spring 2009 Edition</A><br/>
&raquo; <a href="http://www.hplusmagazine.com">HPlus Magazine's main site</A><br/>
&raquo; <a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/editors-blog">R.U. Sirius's editor's blog</A><br/>

</div>
</div>


Of course, that &mdash; in itself &mdash; is scary.  Our favorite narratives &mdash; our favorite movies and stories and comics tend to involve humans being altered by our own technologies to dramatically bad ends.  Most of those stories are silly in the particular, but the broader fear of unintended consequences or the use of advanced technologies by intentionally destructive people isn't silly.  
<br/><br/>
For instance, we explored the very rapid development of robotic technologies for warfare during the web site's <a href="http://www.hplusmagazine.com/articles/ai/poll-terminator-scenario-possible">Terminator Week.</A> That's viscerally scary. Logically it can also mean less civilian casualties, less harm to soldiers, and so on. And on the other hand, it can also mean less hesitation to use violence against others, or a possibly objectionable system of total control in which revolution is permanently rendered impossible.  And on the other hand... I can do the "on the one hand and on the other hand" until the Singularity or at least until the Mayan apocalypse of 2012.
<br/><br/>
But seriously, what really scares the crap out of me is that we might <em>not</em> make radical technological problem-solving breakthroughs &mdash; that we might stop, or that the technologies might fall short of their promises.  What scares me is the idea of a 6 billion-strong species finding itself with diminishing hopes, resource scarcities, insoluble deadly pandemics, and global depression based on the delusions of abstract capital flow resulting in increases in violence and suffering and territoriality and xenophobia.
<br/><br/>
<strong>10Z:</strong> But how does transhumanism resolve these problems?  How does a bunch of rich people living longer solve any of this?
<br/><br/>
<strong>RU:</strong>  Let's take this one at a time.  The technological paradigm that has grown out of transhumanist or radical technological progressive circles that I'm most fond of is NBIC. Nano-Bio-Info-Cogno.   The promise of nanotechnology &mdash; which has become much more tangible just in the last few months (thanks to <a href="http://www.hplusmagazine.com/articles/nano/how-close-are-we-real-nanotechnol
ogy">developments we recently covered on our site</A>) &mdash; is basic control over the structure of matter.  This should eventually solve most of our scarcity problems, with the possible exception of physical space. (And there are ways we might deal with that, but I'm trying to keep it short.) 
<br/><br/>
Nanotechnology, of course, has enormous potentials in terms of health as does biotechnology. People can find these details just about anywhere so I won't go into it. Anyway, sickness is perhaps our greatest source of misery and our greatest resource sink...  particularly if you contrast sickness not just with the absence of disease but with the possibilities of maintaining a high level of vitality. 
<br/><br/>
Then... information technology allows us to organize the data for distributed problem solving and &mdash; to a great degree &mdash; democratizes it.  (More eyes and more brains on the problem, working with and through more intelligent machines.)  IT is at the heart of all the breakthroughs and potential breakthroughs in nano and bio &mdash; and all this is leaving aside the further out projections of hyper-intelligent AIs.  
<br/><br/>
You know, getting back to what's scary, I agree with Vernor Vinge that <a href="http://www.hplusmagazine.com/articles/ai/poll-terminator-scenario-possible">the greatest existential threat is still nuclear warfare</A>.  But next in line is the possibility of a major plague...  a rapidly spreading pandemic.  And already we can see that the tools for dealing with that come down to intelligent systems and biotech.  There's biotech medical solutions using intelligent systems married to global mapping and communications and organized distribution.  Human behavior has a role too, of course... but not as much as romantics might wish.   
<br/><br/><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1705694986576543";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = "468x60_as";
google_ad_type = "text_image";
//2007-08-08: middle of post
google_ad_channel = "1473502658";
google_color_border = "CCCCCC";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "940F04";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "000000";
google_ui_features = "rc:6";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<br/><br/>
Which perhaps brings us to cogno &mdash;  getting control and better use out of the brain for greater intelligence, greater happiness, less misery... hell, maybe even cheaper thrills! Why not?   A lot of our problems are self-created...  or they're created by particularly unstable or irrational people.  As a veteran of the psychedelic culture, the potentials and problems of cognition are a particular area of fascination for me &mdash; and also as a nonconformist who is suspicious of the tendency of society to be hostile towards what we might call creative madness.  So I do have some ambiguities, but it's just a huge area of intrigue as far as I'm concerned. 
<br/><br/>
Now, all of this is just the prosaic stuff, without imagining Singularities, or say hyperintelligent humans who aren't needy...  happily living on converted urine and nutrient pills while entertaining one and other in ever-complexifying virtual spaces.  Lots of energy savings there, Bubb. 
<br/><br/>

<strong>10Z:</strong> President Obama is reconstituting his bio-ethics panel. Just how high are the stakes, in the here and now, regarding U.S. political policy governing future research?
<br/><br/>
<strong>RU:</strong>  You know, I think the bioconservatives who dominated Bush's bio-ethics panel and opposed stem cell research were just pissing in the wind...  but that stuff can hit you in the face.   Really though, I think that the discourse in opposition to embryonic stem cells will some day be seen as every bit as absurd as Monty Python's "every sperm is sacred."  
<br/><br/>
More broadly, I don't think the stakes are very high because I don't think you can get the federal government today to be terribly functional... and I'm not a knee-jerk anti-government guy at the level of economics or investment in research.  I just think there's a certain all-American "can't do" thing going on there and there's no effective strategy for changing it.
<br/><br/>
Sometimes I think that the people who really control America &mdash; the corporate oligarchs and finance kleptocrats, the national security apparatus and so forth &mdash; realize that the Titanic has already hit the iceberg. And laughing up their sleeves they said, "Quick! Put that charismatic black guy behind the wheel!"
<br/><br/>
<strong>10Z:</strong> I'm surprised to hear that you're not a knee-jerk anti-government sort of guy.  I read that you were an anarchist.
<br/><br/>
<strong>RU:</strong> I've read that too.  I have an anarchistic streak, but I can't even begin to believe in it.  I do think that being an anarchist is an excellent choice though, because it's never going to be tried by any large group on a highly populated planet with advanced technology. So you never have to witness or experience the consequences of your belief system being enacted.  It will remain forever romantic.
<br/><br/>
On the whole, though...  I should try to be diplomatic.  Let's just say that anarchists and pure libertarians are the most anti-authoritarian, and I like to be anti-authoritarian. It would be more convenient and more consistent to believe, but I don't think ideologies work in the real world.
<br/><br/>
<strong>10Z:</strong> Let's get back to those ambiguities you mentioned.  That seems like a rare trait in the community represented by <em>h+</em> magazine.
<br/><br/>
<strong>RU:</strong> Hardly. But I'm probably more richly ambiguous than most other human beings.  My only ideology is uncertainty.  Although you'll see it if you explore transhumanist-oriented discussion groups and blogs like Michael Anissimov's <a href="http://www.acceleratingfuture.com/michael/blog/">Accelerating Future</A> or the writings of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0974347221?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0974347221">Nick Bostrom</A> ad infinitum. They're rife with complexity and argumentation, and concern about existential threats, inequalities in the distribution of positive results from scientific achievement, and on and on.  The reality is there's a rich and varied discourse within the techno-progressive movement just as there is between the progressives and the bio-conservatives. 
<br/><br/>
<strong>10Z:</strong> It's hard to see where longevity and immortality fits into your vision of social responsibility.
<br/><br/>
<strong>RU:</strong>  First of all, I emphasized problem solving to respond to your question about fear.  And in essence my answer was I'm more afraid of standing still or going backwards than I am of moving forward.  But man... and woman... cannot live by social responsibility alone.  (We don't go around now asking people to die so we can spare resources or whatever.)
<br/><br/>
And I think that our humor columnist Joe Quirk had <a href="http://www.hplusmagazine.com/articles/humor/meaning-life-lies-its-suckiness">the best response</A> to people who are against hyper-longevity...  holy crap! These people want me to die!  
<br/><br/>
Can we allow people to be the owners and operators of their own experiences and decide for themselves how to answer the Shakespearian question &mdash; to be or not to be?  I think it's doable.  There's a very substantive <a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/articles/forever-young/distribution-post-humanity">discussion from Ramez Naam</A> in our first issue about why hyper-longevity should not create big resource problems. It has to do with demographics and the tendencies of educated, comfortable people to make less kids, and a fairly high percentage of inevitable deaths even if we cure aging and most illnesses.  
<br/><br/>
<strong>10Z:</strong> But won't this exacerbate already extreme class distinctions?  Won't we have a wealthy race of immortals and then everybody else?
<br/><br/>
<strong>RU:</strong>  That's plausible, but very unlikely.  And it always surprises me that that's the first thing you usually hear, since a great portion of the human species already has access to universal health care.  Even left to the market, the investment that's being made in this should eventually lead to a need to sell to a large consumer market.  In our first issue, we have <a href="http://www.hplusmagazine.com/articles/economy/science-fiction-gets-funding">a chart that shows billionaires</A> who are investing in revolutionary science projects... and a few of them are investing in longevity.  Well, they're going to want to take their product to market and get a big consumer share.  John Sperling isn't going to be sitting in some mountain retreat rubbing his hands together and saying, "Foolish mortals, I shall use this only for myself and my beautiful blonde cyborg bride Britney!"  That's the movie version, not the reality.  
<br/><br/><script type='text/javascript'><!--//<![CDATA[
   var m3_u = (location.protocol=='https:'?'https://optimize.indieclick.com/www/delivery/ajs.php':'http://optimize.indieclick.com/www/delivery/ajs.php');
   var m3_r = Math.floor(Math.random()*99999999999);
   if (!document.MAX_used) document.MAX_used = ',';
   document.write ("<scr"+"ipt type='text/javascript' src='"+m3_u);
   document.write ("?zoneid=112");
   document.write ('&amp;cb=' + m3_r);
   if (document.MAX_used != ',') document.write ("&amp;exclude=" + document.MAX_used);
   document.write ("&amp;loc=" + escape(window.location));
   if (document.referrer) document.write ("&amp;referer=" + escape(document.referrer));
   if (document.context) document.write ("&context=" + escape(document.context));
   if (document.mmm_fo) document.write ("&amp;mmm_fo=1");
   document.write ("'><\/scr"+"ipt>");
//]]&gt;--></script><noscript><a href='http://optimize.indieclick.com/www/delivery/ck.php?n=a56196d0&amp;cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE' target='_blank'><img src='http://optimize.indieclick.com/www/delivery/avw.php?zoneid=112&amp;cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE&amp;n=a56196d0' border='0' alt='' /></a></noscript>
<br/><br/>
The reality is actually sort of comical &mdash; the wealthy are the early adapters of new technologies, but those new technologies usually don't work very well at first...  they tend to fuck up.  Now, I think you can imagine <em>that</em> as  a potential movie that can satisfy everybody's need for schadenfreude. 
<br/><br/>
<strong>10Z:</strong> Francis Fukuyama wrote some <a href="http://www.mywire.com/a/ForeignPolicy/Worlds-Most-Dangerous-Ideas/564801?page=4">critiques</A> of the transhumanist vision. In one essay he writes: "Modifying any one of our key characteristics inevitably entails modifying a complex, interlinked package of traits, and we will never be able to anticipate the ultimate outcome." How would you respond?
<br/><br/>
<strong>RU:</strong>  This gets us to the cover story on <a href="http://www.hplusmagazine.com/articles/bio/great-designer-baby-controversy-%E2%80%9909">so-called designer babies</A> in the current Summer Edition of <em>h+</em> magazine. There's hugely intriguing and potentially controversial issues about enhancement in this edition. And that's not only around parents pre-selecting traits for their children, but there's also a portrait of Andy Miah in the issue.  He's a British professor who &mdash; for all intents and purposes &mdash; is pro-sports doping.
<br/><br/>
Before I go into this, I want to take a bit of a detour.  When I wake up in the morning and start working on <em>h+</em>, I'm not thinking "How can I spread propaganda for the glories of transhumanism?" or anything like that.  I'm thinking: "How can I do a totally cool-ass website and magazine with the transhumanist idea and sensibility at the center of it."  That's my charge, and I'm approaching it as a craftsman.  So I'm looking at this first as a magazine writer and editor &mdash; I want it to be accessible, exciting and fun, and I want it to look great.  I want it to ride along the boundary between being a pro-transhumanist magazine and being more of a balanced and very hip generalist geek culture magazine.  That, for me, is the sweet spot in this, and I think, along with other contributors, we've pretty much nailed it.   
<br/><br/>
So I'm first of all an editor and writer.  And secondly, I'm a curious editor and writer. This isn't necessarily all good or all bad. It's interesting. And that's how I'd hope and expect most readers would approach it. 
<br/><br/>
And there's one more thing coming in a very distant third.  In the context of an overarching commitment to my philosophy of uncertainty &mdash; or meta-agnosticism &mdash; I'm an advocate of the radical technological vision.  I've thought long and hard about politics &mdash; and about consciousness unassisted by radical technology &mdash; and I've concluded that radical technology is the only bet that has a chance of winning not just a sufferable but a generally positive and enjoyable human future.  But I'm not a stoical defender of the cause or anything like that.  
<br/><br/>
So what Fukuyama proposes is interesting &mdash; that altering a few alleles to create some characteristics could iterate into monstrous or unhappy consequences further down the road.  And I think that the general consensus among geneticists is that this is very unlikely with the small kinds of changes that are being discussed now (for example, selections of eye and hair color).  Beyond that point, I say... let the arguments rage on!  One of the assumptions among advocates is that by the time we're able to make significant incursions into germ line engineering (to affect people's intelligence or make them more or less aggressive or sexier or whatever), we'll have significantly advanced measurement and predictive tools...plus, a really good understanding of what we're doing.  
<br/><br/>

And there's another argument: we change stuff all the time in the "natural" evolution of human beings &mdash; and we reap both positive and negative consequences. But generally we gain more than we lose by proceeding with technological advances.  There's this idea called the "proactionary principle" which came from Max More, one of the originators of transhumanism.  He basically argues that we measure the potential negative consequences of a technology, but we also need to measure the negative consequences of not developing a technology.  What do we lose by its absence?
<br/><br/>
Anyway, I sort of want to punt &mdash; in the specific &mdash; on the issue around choosing traits for babies.  I prefer to acknowledge that it's a controversial area, but I'm excited to present the articles that are favorable towards these activities and hope they generate lots of interest and discussion.
<br/><br/><script type='text/javascript'><!--//<![CDATA[
   var m3_u = (location.protocol=='https:'?'https://optimize.indieclick.com/www/delivery/ajs.php':'http://optimize.indieclick.com/www/delivery/ajs.php');
   var m3_r = Math.floor(Math.random()*99999999999);
   if (!document.MAX_used) document.MAX_used = ',';
   document.write ("<scr"+"ipt type='text/javascript' src='"+m3_u);
   document.write ("?zoneid=112");
   document.write ('&amp;cb=' + m3_r);
   if (document.MAX_used != ',') document.write ("&amp;exclude=" + document.MAX_used);
   document.write ("&amp;loc=" + escape(window.location));
   if (document.referrer) document.write ("&amp;referer=" + escape(document.referrer));
   if (document.context) document.write ("&context=" + escape(document.context));
   if (document.mmm_fo) document.write ("&amp;mmm_fo=1");
   document.write ("'><\/scr"+"ipt>");
//]]&gt;--></script><noscript><a href='http://optimize.indieclick.com/www/delivery/ck.php?n=a56196d0&amp;cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE' target='_blank'><img src='http://optimize.indieclick.com/www/delivery/avw.php?zoneid=112&amp;cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE&amp;n=a56196d0' border='0' alt='' /></a></noscript>
<br/><br/>
<strong>10Z:</strong> Before I let you go, let me ask you about the politics of <em>h+</em> magazine and the transhumanist movement.  Ronald Bailey, who writes for the libertarian magazine Reason, criticized another transhumanist &mdash; James Hughes &mdash; who apparently advocates democratic socialism.  Where do you come down on all this, and what are the politics of <em>h+</em>?
<br/><br/>
<strong>RU:</strong>  First of all, the magazine has no explicit politics.  Having said that, I think we have an implicit politic that both Ron Bailey and James Hughes agree with. It's the idea that human beings have a right to a high degree of autonomy over their minds and bodies, and that the trend towards transhuman technologies makes those rights all the more important and poignant. So human beings would have the right not just to choose their sexual preferences, or to control their birth processes, or as consenting adults to take whatever substances they like, or to eat what they like. We would also have the right to control and change our biologies, to self-enhance, to alter our bodies through surgery and on and on.  So let me be oh-so-diplomatic, by emphasizing our points of agreement.
<br/><br/>
I'll give a bit of my own perspective in terms of the great late second millennium debate that puts an unfettered market at one end of the spectrum and communism at the other end of the spectrum; that puts competition on one end of the spectrum and cooperation at the other end; that puts decentralization at one of the spectrum and centralization on the other end of the spectrum. I'd have to say I'm horribly centrist.  I'm dead center.  It's not a mainstream centrism, but without going into a long explication, I'm almost embarrassingly moderate. 
<br/><br/>
But while I think these arguments are still lively and vital today &mdash; and I have my own cheers and jeers over each day's political issues &mdash; from a near-futurist transhumanist perspective, the debate seems really tired.  For about a decade I've been arguing that the future I see emerging is witnessed by the open source culture, Wikipedia, and file sharing. And in another decade or two the dominant economic mode will not be the market or socialism or the mixed economy that we actually have pretty much everywhere &mdash; it will be voluntary collaboration. And yes, that's kind of an anarchist view...  but I'm saying it will become the dominant mode, not the only mode. (The market and the state will continue to be factors.) I hear Kevin Kelly <a href="http://www.wired.com/culture/culturereviews/magazine/17-06/nep_newsocialism?currentPage=all">just figured this out.</A> :)...  although his use of loaded words like socialism and collectivism are somewhat unfortunate.
<br/><br/>
People sometimes wonder how wealth will get distributed in a future economy that will likely require close to 0% human participation and that still presumably requires people to hustle themselves up some proof of value.  But I think there's a good chance that an advanced "file-sharing" culture hooked up to advanced production nanotechnology will render the question moot. 
<br/><br/>
Free lunch for everybody!
<P>
<strong>See Also:</strong><br/>
<a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/digitaledition/2009-summer/">Latest issue of <em>h+</em> magazine</A><br/>
<a href="http://cp.revolio.com/issue/393">Read the first issue</A><br/>
<a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/editors-blog/foolish-meatstack-terminator-week-continues-register-reacts-darpa-plans">R.U. Sirius on "Terminator/Robot Week"</A><br/>
<a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/magazine/2009/spring-2009">"Is the Future Cancelled?" Spring 2009 Edition</A><br/>
<a href="http://www.hplusmagazine.com">HPlus Magazine's main site</A><br/>
<a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/editors-blog">R.U. Sirius's editor's blog</A><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2009/06/30/transhumanist-salvation-or-judgment-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Most Violent Super Bowl Ads</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2009/02/02/five-most-violent-super-bowl-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2009/02/02/five-most-violent-super-bowl-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Destiny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/?p=294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watch videos of this year's wackiest Super Bowl slapstick, including two "forbidden" videos which never aired.
<strong>By&#160;Destiny</strong><br/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<strong>Super Bowl ads were always violent,</strong> but Sunday's game cracked the mold.
Men were exploding, electrocuting, and &mdash; in one <a href="#beer_porn_ad">unaired spot</A> &mdash; buying porn at gunpoint. PETA wanted to broadcast sexy models performing near-fellatio
with <a href="http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/123575/peta_ad_dubbed_too_sexy_for_super_bowl/">vegetables</A>, but the day belonged to the dudes. Some were big, some were stupid &mdash; 
but they all had one thing in common.
<br/><br/>
Violence.
<br/><br/><br/>
<strong>#1. I'm Bad</strong><br/>

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GkgZFI4ZT0I&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GkgZFI4ZT0I&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br/><br/>

The meme attains perfection with Pepsi's "I'm good" ad, offering
not one but four violent vignettes (culminating with a man hurtled across the sky
by a high-voltage shock.)  "I'm good," everyone says &mdash; since men can
take anything except the taste of diet cola.
<br/><br/>
It's a bit of a stretch, though it's really just an excuse to show four crazy stunts.
(Pepsi continues a tradition that dates back at least to Bud Light's <a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/02/05/7-things-i-learned-from-superbowl-ads/">infamous slapping ads.</A>)
But you know what I can't take?  <br/><br/>Pepsi's stupid new logo.
<br/><br/><br/>

<a name="beer_porn_ad"></A><strong>#2. Beer and Porn</strong>
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gOu_zDnX54U&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gOu_zDnX54U&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br/><br/>
"You needed a secret code to see this spot online,"
warns one YouTube user &mdash; before uploading a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOu_zDnX54U">pirated</A> version of Budweiser's 2009 pitch for Bud Light. It's a two-minute dramedy demonstrating just how bizarre a commercial can get.  
(At one point, Budweiser actually had to pixelate a vibrator.) "Please drink responsibly," Bud adds at the end.
<br/><br/>
Since the days of Chaucer, porn has united humankind in a warm round of uncomfortable nervous laughter. But with this ad, Budweiser may have sent the wrong message: bad things happen when you drink Bud Light.
<br/><br/>
Especially...the crappy taste of Bud Light.
<br/><br/><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1705694986576543";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = "468x60_as";
google_ad_type = "text_image";
//2007-08-08: middle of post
google_ad_channel = "1473502658";
google_color_border = "CCCCCC";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "940F04";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "000000";
google_ui_features = "rc:6";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<br/><br/><br/>
<strong>#3. A Grand Slam They Can't Refuse</strong>
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/p96FC_fQrg0&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/p96FC_fQrg0&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br/><br/>
Denny's turned to the mafia to promote their "free breakfast on Tuesday" promotion. 
But Denny's first Super Bowl ad ever &mdash; "Thugs" &mdash; finds their conversation
interrupted by a waitress spraying a smiley face onto their pancakes.
<br/><br/>
It's a slap at IHOP (which dessert-ifies every pancake beyond recognition).
But personally, I think the real mafia is behind all those ads for <a href="http://www.cockeyed.com/citizen/goldkit/cheat.shtml">Cash4Gold.</A>
<br/><br/>And <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KjMDc5IxUk">William Shatner's toupee.</A>
<br/><br/><br/>
<strong>#4. Talk Into the Clown's Mouth</strong>
<br/>
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kqT_5f08Nxs&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/kqT_5f08Nxs&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br/><br/>


After 40 years, Jack was finally mowed down by a bus &mdash; presumably spilling secret Jack sauce all over the street.
"No. It's really bad," says a flunky into his cell phone. "I'm just lying to him to cheer him up."
But one <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/02/01/MN0T15LDLS.DTL">columnist</A> pointed out that the Jack in the Box site wasn't broadcasting
the follow-up ad. "Should we just assume he's dead?"
<br/><br/>
There's a <a href="http://twitter.com/jackbox">fake Twitter feed</A>, and 
HangInThereJack.com racked up nearly 500 comments &mdash; possibly from his ad agency.
("LETS ALL EAT MORE JACK IN THE BOX SO THEY CAN PAY THE DOCTOR BILLS!")
But most greeted the ghoulish ad campaign with an appropriate dose of internet cynicism
<br/><blockquote>
			can I have your STUFF???<br/>
			THIS IS THE DUMBEST THING IVE SEEN OR HEARD!!!! <br/>
			Your food actually made me sick yesterday!<br/>
</blockquote><br/>
And one commenter even suggested Jack's biggest problem was with the jerk who produced his Super Bowl ad.
<br/><br/>
"Maybe the camera man should have yelled something like, 'Look Out!' 
instead of just standing there recording your death."

<br/><br/><script type='text/javascript'><!--//<![CDATA[
   var m3_u = (location.protocol=='https:'?'https://optimize.indieclick.com/www/delivery/ajs.php':'http://optimize.indieclick.com/www/delivery/ajs.php');
   var m3_r = Math.floor(Math.random()*99999999999);
   if (!document.MAX_used) document.MAX_used = ',';
   document.write ("<scr"+"ipt type='text/javascript' src='"+m3_u);
   document.write ("?zoneid=112");
   document.write ('&amp;cb=' + m3_r);
   if (document.MAX_used != ',') document.write ("&amp;exclude=" + document.MAX_used);
   document.write ("&amp;loc=" + escape(window.location));
   if (document.referrer) document.write ("&amp;referer=" + escape(document.referrer));
   if (document.context) document.write ("&context=" + escape(document.context));
   if (document.mmm_fo) document.write ("&amp;mmm_fo=1");
   document.write ("'><\/scr"+"ipt>");
//]]&gt;--></script><noscript><a href='http://optimize.indieclick.com/www/delivery/ck.php?n=a56196d0&amp;cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE' target='_blank'><img src='http://optimize.indieclick.com/www/delivery/avw.php?zoneid=112&amp;cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE&amp;n=a56196d0' border='0' alt='' /></a></noscript>
<br/><br/>
<br/>

<a name="macgruber"></A><strong>#5. The Unaired MacGruber</strong>
<object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/m7bQZLtgHts&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/m7bQZLtgHts&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object>
<br/><br/>MacGruber jumped the shark two years ago &mdash; after the first of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacGruber#Other_Lonely_Island_shorts_on_SNL">seven appearances</A> on Saturday Night Live.
The night before the game, the real MacGyver even appeared in a Saturday Night Live skit
in which he confronts "MacGruber" about selling out.  (It's right before MacGruber pauses to announce "There's always time for Pepsi" &mdash; and then dying in an oil refinery explosion.)  In the final SNL segment, the theme song changed its lyrics altogether to just "Pepsi Pepsi Pepsi Pepsi" &mdash; and every single word of MacGruber's dialogue became "Pepsi."
<br/><br/>
At that point, anything that happened on Super Bowl Sunday would be anti-climactic.
<br/><br/>
And I still wish they'd detonate that logo.
<br/><br/><strong>See Also:</strong>
<br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/02/05/7-things-i-learned-from-superbowl-ads/ ">7 Things I Learned From Super Bowl Ads</A><br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/04/01/5-best-videos-animals-attacking-reporters/">5 Best Videos: Animals Attacking Reporters</A><Br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/04/26/pulp-fiction-parodies-on-youtube/">Pulp Fiction Parodies on YouTube</A><br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/02/12/apple-computer-mac-sex-videos/">5 Sexiest Apple Videos</A><BR/>
<img src="http://www.aolwatch.org/foo.gif">]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2009/02/02/five-most-violent-super-bowl-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush&#8217;s Last Day: 10 Ways America Celebrated</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2009/01/21/bushs-last-day-10-ways-america-celebrated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2009/01/21/bushs-last-day-10-ways-america-celebrated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lou Cabron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics, Law & War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/?p=293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former President's departure is celebrated with anger, humor, pornography, <em>The Onion</em> &#8212; and some shoes. <strong>By&#160;Lou&#160;Cabron</strong><br/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.mondoglobo.net/images/Celebrating%20George%20Bush%27s%20last%20day%20as%20President.jpg" width=468>
<br/><br/><strong>"For 15 minutes,</strong> America turned its gaze from the guy who landed the plane in the river to the guy who landed the country in the ditch," joked Jimmy Kimmel &mdash; adding that
“White House decorators are busy right now peeling the glow-in-the-dark stars off the ceiling in the presidential bedroom.” 
<br/><br/> 
Back in Texas, George Bush told a crowd Tuesday that "when I get home tonight and look in the mirror, I'm not going to regret what I see &mdash; except maybe some gray hair." 
But many Americans reacted differently to the Bush presidency, observing the end of his eight-year term with some anger, some humor &mdash; and a lot of all-American creativity.



<br/><br/><br/><strong>1. Calls for Arrest</strong><br/><br/>

At the President's last appearance, the <em>L.A. Times</em> <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/inauguration/la-na-inaug-bush-cheney21-2009jan21,0,4723203.story">reported</A>, crowds responded with anger. "Just as demonstrators clogged the barricades to protest his court-mediated victory in the 2000 election, so the disenchanted lined Pennsylvania Avenue on Tuesday to express their dismay..." 

<Blockquote>
On the drive to Capitol Hill, the current and future presidents passed protesters carrying signs reading "Arrest Bush." When Bush entered the grandstand with the band playing "Hail to the Chief" for the last time, the crowd below began singing a different refrain: "Hey, Hey, Good-bye." 
<br/><br/>
One man waved his shoe. 
 <br/><br/>
And finally, when Bush's helicopter lifted off from the east front of the Capitol, cheers rose from the crowd and throng stretching down the National Mall.
</blockquote>
<br/>

The <em>Times</em> noted that while Bush is famous for being thick-skinned, "as the morning wore on, his smile appeared to grow more strained..."
<br/><br/><!--adsense-->

<br/><br/><br/><strong>2.  Signing Off</strong><br/><br/>

Some pranksters went even further. Down a two-mile stretch of San Francisco, they <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/tags/obamastreetsign/">changed</A>
all the street signs identifying Bush Street to...Obama Street.  "The entire street <em>was covered</em> end to end," one of the pranksters told us &mdash; adding that the media mistakenly thought they'd missed a few intersections becuase "locals were actually taking them down the next morning as souvenirs!" 
<br/><br/>
Tuesday's prank 
<a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/inauguraljourney/detail?&#038;entry_id=34818">reminded</A> one area watcher of an even harsher prank eight years ago. "When Bush was first elected all the BUSH street signs were changed to say PUPPET." But one newspaper noted San Francisco voters had rejected the ultimate prank &mdash; a city measure that would've renamed a sewage treatment plant after former President Bush. 


<br/><br/><br/><strong>3.  The Onion Gets It Right</strong><br/><br/>

<em>The Onion</em> had run a prophetic headline back in January of 2001, mocking President Bush
with a fake quote.  "Our long national nightmare of peace and prosperity is finally over."
Monday blogger Teresa Hayden <a href="http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/010952.html">collected</A> every Bush-related story from <em>The Onion</eM> &mdash; nearly 400 of them &mdash; arguing that "Other histories of the Bush years will doubtless be more factual, but none will ever be truer."
<br/><br/>
<em>The Onion</em> kept tweaking the president throughout his eight-year presidency. There's Bush "horrified to learn Presidential salary," and <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/news/u_s_takes_out_debt_consolidation">later</A>, "U.S. Takes Out <a href="http://www.creditloan.com/debt-consolidation-loans/">Debt Consolidation Loan</a>." But many of the headlines focus on the war in Iraq.
<br/>
<blockquote>Bush Won't Stop Asking Cheney If We Can Invade Yet<br/><br/>
Bush Thought War Would Be Over By Now<br/><br/>
Bush Subconsciously Sizes Up Spain For Invasion<br/><br/>
Bush Asks Congress For $30 Billion To Help Fight War On Criticism<br/><br/>
Rumsfeld Only One Who Can Change Toner In White House Printer
</blockquote>
<br/>
"[I]n this moment before a changing world overwrites our memories of the era," the blogger writes, "let us pause to salute our constant companion of those years..."



<br/><br/><br/><strong>4. Heckling CNN</strong><br/><br/>

Oakland's Parkway theatre announced they'd broadcast a feed from CNN on their 
movie screens Tuesday, including Bush's final departure and Obama's swearing-in. By 7 a.m., nearly 400 people had formed a massive line outside the theatre, and many had to be turned away. Extra chairs were set up in the theatre's aisles, and the huge liberal crowd booed the Republicans as they appeared on the screen &mdash; Dick Cheney, Dan Quayle &mdash; and later heckled
Bush's departure. And as the former president finally stepped onto a helicopter to fly away from the capitol, one heckler suggested an alternate flight plan.
<br/><br/>
"Send him to Guantanamo!"
<br/><br/><!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
<br/><br/>
Also watching were 5,000 schoolchildren at a community center in Harlem. "It hurt my ears. That's how crazy it got," <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=99550300
">reported</A> NPR's Robert Smith. But as Bush ceded his presidency to Obama, "Some didn't seem to catch the finer points of presidential transitions," NRP reports.  "...about five minutes into Obama's speech, the attention of the younger kids started to drift. <br/><br/>"They threw paper at each other and used their American flags as swords."


<br/><br/><br/><strong>5.  The Last "Great Moment"</strong><br/><br/>

David Letterman assembled a final four-minute montage of Bush's greatest goofs,
celebrating the end of a recurring feature on the late-night comedy show: "Great Moments in Presidential Speeches."
<br/><br/>
"[W]e have to unload what was a tremendous rich heavy-laden vein of comedy for us," Letterman told his audience nostalgically. For over four minutes, the gaffes keep coming, and towards the end, they get even weirder.  There's  the thrown shoe, the dropped dog &mdash; and the infamous moment when Bush's speech was accompanied by a continually-yawning boy in a red baseball cap.
<br/><br/>
<center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nK9d_j_HzNU&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nK9d_j_HzNU&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center>




<br/><br/><br/><strong>6.  Jenna's Last Ride</strong><br/><br/>

Jenna Bush and her twin sister Barbara were more famous for partying than for public service &mdash; but they observed the transition with a letter left behind for President Obama's daughters. They <a href=" http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123239885943895155.html?mod=rss_Today%27s_Most_Popular
">remembered</A> when their father's father was sworn in &mdash; "being seven, we didn't quite understand the gravity of the position our Grandfather was committing to" &mdash; but much of their letter seems like it was ghost-written by a Republican spinmeister.  ("Our Dad, who read to us nightly...is our father, not the sketch in a paper or part of a skit on TV.") And instead of writing "Eight years go by so fast," the catty Bush twins wrote to the daughters of Obama that "Four years goes by so fast..."


<br/><br/><br/><strong>7.  Battle of the Presidential Speeches</strong><br/><br/>

The site SpeechWars.com created a <a href="http://www.speechwars.com/inaug/index.php">special exhibit</A> including Bush's own inaugural addresses in 2001 and 2005 &mdash; along with those of every president that preceded him.  "See how often US presidents have said certain words in their inaugural addresses," the site promised &mdash; and it ultimately uncovered two forbidden words which Bush and his predecessors had never spoken in any of the 56 pervious inaugural addresses &mdash; but which Barack Obama did.
<br/><br/> 
"Non-believers" and "Muslims."
<br/><br/>
But Bush's first inauguration speech from 2001 is still shouting out from <a href="http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache:esSMqkjqqEcJ:www.whitehouse.gov/news/inaugural-address.html+george+w+bush+inaugural+address&#038;hl=en&#038;ct=clnk&#038;cd=4&#038;gl=us">Google's cache</A>, reminding web surfers how Dubya promised to reform social security &mdash; and 
to "confront weapons of mass destruction." And blogger Andrew Sullivan <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/01/we-should-have.html">remembered</A> a <em>Saturday Night Live</em> sketch at the same time
which presciently predicted that President Bush would eventually tell the American people that 
"we had that war thing happen." In the skit, Bush hold up a map showing the Atlantic ocean flooding
Louisiana (with the flooding continuing all the way up to Minnesota...) Unfortunately, according to the skit's
"glimpse of our future," this alternate reality would be even worse because Vice President Dick Cheney is involved in a hunting accident &mdash; where he's killed by President Bush.



<br/><br/><br/><strong>8.  Perverts Say Goodbye</strong><br/><br/>
At a rowdy San Francisco Event called "Bye Bye Bush," San Francisco writer Thomas Roche debuted a new 34-page <a href="http://thomasroche.com/2009/01/20/free-story-one-cold-grey-october-in-tuscvari/">"gonzo sci-fi cryptozoological horror"</A> story involving evil fish, the Bigfoot monster, and the mayor of a small town in Alaska (and her husband Todd).  "I was asked repeatedly to write some political smut," Roche explains, "for a Sarah Palin porn site, for an election reading, and finally for an inauguration-themed reading..."
<br/><br/><!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
<br/><br/>
A half dozen local writers read their short fiction as part of the "Perverts Put Out" series, but Roche came up with a "gonzo Lovecraftian science fiction horror story" in which several Alaska tourists and some unsuspecting environmentalists wander into the dark and mysterious backwoods, and confront &mdash; no, no, it's too horrible to describe. "Fairly creepy sexual description..." Roche warns at the top of the story.  "Not intended for readers under 18."  
<br/><br/>
"I read an extremely abbreviated version of this story in a room full of weird sexual deviants, and people seemed to like it."



<br/><br/><br/><strong>9.  Free the White House</strong><br/><br/>

"Here's a small and nerdy measure of the huge change in the executive branch," <a href="http://www.kottke.org/09/01/the-countrys-new-robotstxt-file">wrote</A> blogger Jason Kottke. The White House's web site had more than 2400 restrictions for search engines &mdash; preventing web-crawling spiders from accessing entire directories, photo essays, and the text of certain speeches.
<br/><br/>
Geeks argued about whether this represented a moving break from the past &mdash; or simply an <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obamas-whitehousegov.html#comment-384508">artifact</A> of web coding. But one thing's clear &mdash; George W. Bush won't be leaving any more policy statements on the site.
<br/><br/>
In <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2009/01/20/bush-looking-forward-to-new-domestic-agenda/">Texas Tuesday,</A> George Bush joked that his wife Laura "was excited about me mowing the lawn and taking out the trash &mdash; it's my new domestic agenda."


<br/><br/><br/><strong>10.  Losing Facebook</strong><br/><br/>
In the last year of Bush's presidency, a Facebook group rose to over 1,000,000 members. The name of <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=5022036305">the group</A>? "I bet I can find 1,000,000 people who dislike George Bush!"
<br/><br/>
But now many members are commemorating Bush's departure with a final Facebook ritual.
Over 190,858 messages appeared on its Facebook "wall," with many now announcing that it's time to move on.
<br/>
<blockquote>

well it was a good run, but its finally over. Later guys...
<br/><br/>
I still hate George Bush... but he's gone so I don't see the point in having this crowd up my groups now.
<br/><br/>
"im leaving this group to move on from this era"
<br/><br/>
"NOW I CAN LEAVE THIS GROUP IT IS IRRELEVANT"
</blockquote>

<br/>
But as George W. Bush finally left office, there was <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=43591387564">a new group</A> was already springing up on Facebook clamoring for the new president to enact a more liberal policy. Its name?  "5 million strong to petition Obama to legalize weed."
<br/><br/>
It currently has just 3409 members.<br/><br/><strong>See Also:</strong><br/>

<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/11/10/20-wildest-reactions-to-obamas-victory/">20 Wildest Reactions to Obama's Victory</A><br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/09/29/site-sparks-political-sexiness-war/">Site Sparks Political Sexiness War</A><br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/09/24/25-harshest-reactions-to-the-wall-street-bailout/">25 Harshest Reactions to the Wall Street Bailout</A><br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/10/02/why-palins-sex-life-matters/">Why Sarah's Sex Life Matters</A><br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/08/08/dont-go-there-top-20-taboo-topics-for-presidential-candidates/">Don't Go There: 20 Taboo Topics For Presidential Candidates</A><br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/11/05/oakland-celebrates-obamas-victory/">Oakland Celebrates Obama's Victory</A>
<br/><br/><!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
<br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2009/01/21/bushs-last-day-10-ways-america-celebrated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>War of the Candidate Music Videos</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/03/30/war-of-the-candidate-music-videos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/03/30/war-of-the-candidate-music-videos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lou Cabron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics, Law & War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/03/30/war-of-the-candidate-music-videos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama, John McCain, and Hillary Clinton confront an emerging YouTube demographic.  But are they facing a backlash?  <strong>By&#160;Lou&#160;Cabron</strong>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br /><strong>Is there an emerging YouTube demographic?</strong> Politically-themed music videos
may be offering
an unacknowledged
glimpse at the next generation of voters. But judging from these clips, their real message might be 
that elections are stupid,
and what's really important is who's got the
funniest music videos.
<br /><br />
<!--adsense-->
<br /> <br />
This summer famously saw <a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/19/youtubes-5-sorriest-questions-for-the-2008-presidential-candidates/">debating candidates</A> facing questions from a cartoon-voiced talking snowman, and 
Barack Obama's inspiring "Yes I Can" speech
eventually morphed into a hip music video.  But at the same time, 
though Barack lost Ohio's primary,
he won the support of a whopping 
<em>75 percent</em> of voters under the age of 24.

If America's future will ultimately be
determined by YouTube, it's these young video stars who are running
the secret campaign.
<br /><br />
So what is the new generation trying to tell us?
<br /><br /><br />
<strong>1.  Hillary Boy</strong>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jLSWudoqtWE&#038;hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jLSWudoqtWE&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
Not only is she mandating universal healthcare for millions
&mdash; but YouTube user DaveDays also has a crush on her.
<br /><br />
He admits candidly in the second verse that "I don't have political views,"
but states that 60-year-old Hillary has still won his support because of
"Those thighs, those eyes.  Yeah, yeah, yeah..."
<br /><br />
Using doctored footage showing Hillary winning a dance contest,
he implies that Barack Obama can't win because 
his own supporters' videos are insufficiently sexy.
"Obama Girl you're a skank," sings Days,
warning his sexy video rival that she
can't ensure an Obama victory "even if you take off all your clothes." 
Such is the devotion of this Green Day wannabe (with the Republican mom)
that he'd even choose to watch Hillary instead of the Teletubbies.
Which kind of puts the whole primary in perspective...
<br /><br />
Day's
real interest is becoming a video star &mdash; as he
himself acknowledges in the video's description.  <br /><br />"This is a spoof of obama girls vid.."
he scribbles.

<blockquote>dont take it too seriously ;-)</blockquote>
<br /><br />
<!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
<br /><br />
Unfortunately, only 900,000 people have watched his video,
putting his efforts slightly behind Taryn Southern's own <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=-Sudw4ghVe8">lesbian-themed video</A> about her own crush on the candidate, "Hott 4 Hill."  ("I know you're not gay, but I'm hoping for bi-")
But together they've created a visual, musical, sexually-charged dialogue
&mdash; which is entirely free of any actual political issues.
<br />
<br /><br />
<strong>2. The Obama Girl Revolution</strong><br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1zMeHfxhJbw&#038;hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1zMeHfxhJbw&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

<br /><br />
In November  "Obama Girl" recorded a public service announcement
arguing America's political system suffered
from one longstanding dysfunction:
public servants who can't dance.
The video was viewed just 135,659 times, suggesting
that 25-year-old model Amber Lee Ettinger
had already fallen from her earlier fame.
<br /><br />
As the original video figurehead, Barely Political's "Obama Girl" launched the
craze for political musical videos back in June of 2007,
though there's no evidence it impacted the
campaigns.  HCD Research later discovered that
the responses reported most-frequently
for her famous video were "irritated" (48%) and "embarrassed" (35%).
There's even something vaguely fascist about
<a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=axxooGIgOKs">her newest music video</A>, released Tuesday,
in which she wails to Hillary to surrender because "it's become an
Obama nation."
<br /><br />
Ironically, all that crushing didn't
actually lead her to vote for Obama.
According to a February post on a
<em>New York Times</em> blog, Obama Girl skipped the
New Jersey primary after a weekend of
partying at the Super Bowl.
<br /><br />
And she didn't vote for <em>anyone</em>.
<br />
<br /><br />
<strong>3.  Viva!</strong>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0fd-MVU4vtU&#038;hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0fd-MVU4vtU&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<br /><br/>

There's a positive side to political music videos.
The dialogue has been democratized,
with every voice claiming a part
of the internet for its own message.
Miguel Orozco, a Mexican-American Obama supporter born in East L.A.,
created Amigos de Obama.com 
"to fill a void in media outreach to Latinos"
according to a message on his site.
("Tu Voto Tiene Swing!" it welcomes visitors...)
<br /><br />
The site also displays one of the most sincere
music videos, one that actually hopes to
persuade voters &mdash; in this case,
the crucial hispanic demographic &mdash; using
a mariachi band.  "Viva Obama!" the corridos sing...
<blockquote>
"Families united and safe and even with a health care plan...
His struggle is also our struggle, and today we
urgently need a change..."
</blockquote>
<br />
"Out of many, we are truly one," Barack announced last week
in a speech about race &mdash; and it seems true even the world of viral
music videos. Elsewhere on the web, there's even a video called <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=sA-451XMsuY">Barack
OBollywood.</A>
<br /><br /><br />
<strong>4.  "Oh my god!  No!!!"</strong><br />
<br /><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9iu9r040blE&#038;hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9iu9r040blE&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<br /><br />

In an age of music videos,
the worst sin is bad production values.
The video <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FvyGydc8no">Hillary4U&#038;Me</A> became viral simply
because it was so bad, and ultimately it
even provoked a YouTube counter-meme:
the horrified reaction video.
("Oh my god!  No!  That is horrible!  Ah ha ha ha ha ha!
Are you serious?!" screams YouTube
user CloudIzMe, as his friends gather around laughing in derision.) 
User "UltimateJosh" attempted
to inject some edge by creating
a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iu9r040blE&#038;feature=related">metal "Rock Remix"</A>
by replacing the soundtrack with Marilyn Manson's
"Better of Two Evils."
<br /><br />
"I will step on you on my way up, and I will step on
you on my way down...")
<br /><br /><!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
<br /><br />
The music videos have evolved into
post-modern deconstructive "meta" videos.
But we still don't know which candidate has the
best healthcare proposal.
<br /><br /><br />
<strong>5.  McCain-o-mania</strong>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/eLjHKMBZ1ik&#038;hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/eLjHKMBZ1ik&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
How long until John McCain feels compelled
to record his own music video?
The answer came in 2002,
when the 65-year-old former prisoner of war
appeared on Saturday Night Live to sing 
a medley of Barbara Streisand songs.
<br /><br />
"I've been in politics for over 20 years,"
he tells the audience, "and for over 20 years I've
had Barbara Streisand trying to do my job..."
<br /><br />
As the tables turned, the young writers at Saturday Night
Live thought they were writing a satire.
But instead they'd stumbled into a harbinger of 
the strange future to come,
when music and politics would collide into a
near-meaningless jumble of amateur glory hounds.
<br /><br />
Though it still remains to be seen who they'll vote for.
<br /><br />
<strong>See Also:</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/07/30/democratic-cartoon-candidates/">Democratic Cartoon Candidates</A><Br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/19/youtubes-5-sorriest-questions-for-the-2008-presidential-candidates/">YouTube 5 Sorriest Questions for the 2008 Presidential Candidates</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/04/01/5-best-videos-animals-attacking-reporters/">5 Best Videos: Animals Attacking Reporters</A><BR />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2006/10/04/5-nastiest-campaign-ads-so-far/">5 More Nasty Campaign Ads</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/04/26/pulp-fiction-parodies-on-youtube/">Pulp Fiction Parodies on YouTube</A>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/03/30/war-of-the-candidate-music-videos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawrence Welk vs. The Hippies</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/03/13/lawrence-welk-vs-the-hippies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/03/13/lawrence-welk-vs-the-hippies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Destiny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/03/13/lawrence-welk-vs-the-hippies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the bandleader's 105th birthday, five videos remember his skirmishes with the 
Beatles, Lou Reed, and a song about marijuana.  <strong>By&#160;Destiny</strong><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br />
<strong>Lawrence Welk was approaching</strong> his seventies when radical changes suddenly hit America's music scene.
<br /><br />
The clash in the late 1960s shook the band leader, America's most famous square, and he confronted the raging turmoil in a series of shocking performances &mdash; at least, according to these five videos.
<br /><br /><!--adsense-->
<br /><br />
Thirty years before <I>American Idol</i>, parts of America were still uncomfortable with the very  idea of rock songs even appearing on television, especially during Welk's squeaky-clean song and dance show. And since <em>The Lawrence Welk Show</em> ran for three decades, these videos suggest the ultimate long, strange trip.  They're a window in time, capturing a bizarre never-world where the hour-long show actually surrendered happily to the coming onslaught of rock.
<br /><br />

<strong>1.  Stop the Music</strong>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/oFmSv2WFDrs&#038;hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oFmSv2WFDrs&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

<br /><br />
In a historic telecast, five men in yellow blazers and five women in matching blouses
were confronted by "Hippie Welk."
<br /><br />
The smiley man who played polkas on his accordion suddenly appeared with long hair and Beatle spectacles, flashing a peace sign and barking "Don't you cats know this polka
jazz is strictly from Squares-ville? I can't stand that kind of music."
<br /><br />
The audience actually gasps...
<br /><br />
Backed by a Day-Glo drum, Welk then launches his singers into Wilson Pickett's "She's Looking Good." (Joking about bands with animal names, Welk says "I just opened the cages, and look what I released... The Babbling Baboons.")  It rocks.  Even if Welk's cast isn't quite sure how to dance to it.
<br /><br />
It's a seismic shift in America's cultural landscape, as the song's driving beat fries
the minds of America for exactly forty seconds. But then Welk's two white "soul sisters"
are interrupted by some very unconvincing acting, as two female cast-members complain "Mr. Welk... This isn't like you at all." <br /><br />
Returning to their pre-liberated state of near-infantalism, they 
ask Welk about his trademark champagne music.  "Whatever happened to the music that went
doodly doodly doodly doodly doot?" They give him a raspberry, the audience applauds loudly, and
Welk smilingly says "Of course, by now you folks know we were only kidding."
<br /><br />
"We wouldn't do that to you nice people."
<br /><br /><br />
<strong>2. Sucking on a Ding-dong</strong>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/i48BP1PUoFI&#038;hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/i48BP1PUoFI&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<br /><br /><br />
Welk's heroin habit eventually caught up with him, and he was swallowed whole by a voracious counterculture.  In a shocking turnaround, he brought in Lou Reed to jam
with the show's banjo player, organist, drummer, and orchestra, citing a song which was "high" in popularity. 
<br /><br />
A remarkable video shows the squares in Welk's audience bobbing in a slow waltz
as The Velvet Underground rips through "Sister Ray." ("I'm searching for my mainer,
I said I couldn't hit it sideways...")
<br /><br /><!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
<br /><br />
"Wonderful!" Welk declares at the end.
<br /><br />
"Mr. Welk... This isn't like you at all," you can imagine his singers saying.  Though of course, by now you
folks know we were only 
kidding about that heroin habit...
<br /><br /><br />
<strong>3.  Sweet Jesus</strong>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ye3ecDYxOkg&#038;hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ye3ecDYxOkg&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
Yes, "Dale and Gail" are actually singing
about the excessive use of marijuana: the devil's weed, 
the great satanic corrupter of our youth
&mdash; and the counterculture's intellectual lubricant.  While the Velvet Underground video was a mashup, Welk really did
trot out a 23-year-old rejected Miss Oklahoma contestant to croon a shockingly wholesome
rendition of "One Toke Over the Line."   Maybe he was trying to tell us something.
<br /><br />
Nearly 40 years later, the clip ignited
a new controversy.  Tom Shipley,
one of the drug-friendly song's original singers,
uploaded Welk's version onto YouTube &mdash; and nearly immediately, it drew 
over 160 comments.

<blockquote>
	"Do these two know what a 'toke' even is?"<br />
	"This fails so hard it approaches win from the other side."<br />
	"I think I'm about to stab pencils into my eyes and ears."<br />
</blockquote>
<br />
Welk was famous again, but for all the wrong reasons, as this forgotten moment in time "sparked" a very 21st-century enthusiasm.

<blockquote>

	"I want to make physical love to this clip."<br />
	"Way to go, Light-em-up Larry!"<br />
	"a priceless moment in television history"<br />
	"Champagne...the gateway drug!"<br />
</blockquote>
<br />
Though perhaps inevitably, some commenters also searched for a
hidden message in the couple's giddy vocal delivery.
<blockquote>
	"look at their eyes!!, their baked!!"<br />
	"oh. my. god. becky, look at her blunt."<br />
	"She has to be baked to wear that outfit."<br />
</blockquote>
<Br />
There's no evidence that Dale and Gail actually toked up before singing the song.  But when accordionist Myron Floren introduces them &mdash; there's obviously <em>something</em> that's making him cough.

<br />
<br /><br />
<strong>4.  Meet the Beatles.</stronG>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Yf2kbBinvI4&#038;hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Yf2kbBinvI4&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
Drugs influenced the Beatles
too, but when they
broke up, 
it was Lawrence Welk who picked up their countercultural cred, 
turning "Hey Jude" into one of "ten big songs"
on his ground-breaking concept album, <em>Galveston.</em>
But where the Beatles released "Hey Jude" together
with "Revolution," Welk paired it up with
a softer song &mdash; Glen Campbell's "Gentle on My Mind."
<br /><br />
<!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
<br /><br />
Its graceful trumpet solo inspired audiences
to waltz and vote for Nixon, 
shortly before a startling 
full-orchestra crescendo into the chorus, and one brief flourish of funk from an
unappreciated bass player.
<br /><br />
In a surreal moment, the string section saws away 
underneath a giant golden sign which 
says: "Geritol."
<br /><br />
It was nobody's Woodstock.  
<br /><br /><br />
<strong>5.  Smoke on the Water?</strong><br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pag45E_ihwY&#038;hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pag45E_ihwY&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
It was almost heroic the way
Welk clung to his kitschy schtick 
in the face of a changing world
&mdash; his own personal freak flag,
flown gloriously high.
<br /><Br />
Welk was nearly 90 when he died in 1989,
but he lived long enough to see 
another accordion player make the big time,
possibly channeling his spirit.
In the early '80s, Weird Al Yankovic offered up the
ultimate tribute,
mixing Welk's "Bubbles in the Wine"
into an accordion medley of 14
ridiculously inappropriate 
songs, from Devo to Jimi Hendrix,
the Clash and the Who.
<br /><br />
Later footage of Welk's show was even spliced into a video for the
hyperactive medley (which <em>also</em> included "Hey Jude"), creating a montage that's oddly reminiscent of the surreal bandleader himself.  
It ultimately proves that given enough accordions, <em>any</em> song can become
soul-crushingly square.  <br /><br />Even "Smoke on the Water."
<br /><br /><br />
<strong>100 Years After</strong>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8Re-wSAhEuM&#038;hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8Re-wSAhEuM&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<br /><br />

It's been 105 years since Lawrence Welk was born.
(Tuesday would've been his birthday.)

But this November saw an interesting coda.<br /><br />
A video was uploaded to YouTube showing an audience of 
high school students baffled by
a vinyl record of Welk's polka band performing "Minnie the Mermaid."
Their heads bob as Welk's deep-voiced singer croons about
the time he'd spent down in her seaweed bungalow...
<br /><br />
But it turns out it was a time capsule within a time capsule,
since the video came from a public access TV show they'd
recorded for their local cable outlet in the 1980s.
(An earlier episode featured a video by GWAR.)
The two teenaged mid-80s hipsters are playing a song from 1957, just a pit stop on the
song's journey to YouTube 50 years later.
<br /><br />
The video has been watched just 87 times, but it drew one comment that
puts the whole thing in perspective.  "Now your show seems as ancient here as the Lawrence Welk
record did..."
In the future, maybe everyone will be Lawrence Welk for 15 minutes.  
<br /><br />
He'd learned to play the accordion before he'd learned to speak English at the age of 21, and rose from a
poor immigrant family to become one of the richest men in Hollywood.  But it was his earnest commitment to hokey friendliness that made him a kind of legend.  Even if Welk never grokked the emergence of rock music, one YouTube comment suggested Welk had earned some respect simply for the role he'd played for the generations that came before.<br /><br />
"He made my grandparents &mdash; whom I loved dearly &mdash; happy during the final years of their lives.  For that, I respect him."


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/03/13/lawrence-welk-vs-the-hippies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adam West and Davy Jones Meet Sexina</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/02/15/adam-west-and-davy-jones-meet-sexina/</link>
		<comments>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/02/15/adam-west-and-davy-jones-meet-sexina/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Destiny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/02/15/adam-west-and-davy-jones-meet-sexina/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She's part Britney Spears, and part secret agent. But can she top two TV icons from the 1960s?
<strong>By Destiny</strong><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://mondoglobo.net/images/Sexina%20-%20starring%20Adam%20West.jpg" alt="Sexina starring Adam West"><br/><br/>
<strong>Ladies and gentlemen...meet Sexina!</strong>
<BR/><BR/>
A James Bond-style theme song rolls behind the opening credits
of a new film featuring Adam West as a ruthless criminal mastermind.
But its star is Sexina,
part Britney Spears, part
private-investigator-secretly-fighting corruption-in-the-music-industry.
<BR/><BR/><!--adsense-->
<br /><br />
79-year-old West plays a ruthless music industry overlord
bent on destroying the sexy pop sensation with an evil boy band
composed entirely of cuddly robots.  The ultimate irony?
The movie's theme is sung by Davy Jones, whose vocals for The Monkees in the 1960s make him one of the original boy band singers.
<BR/><BR/>

<img src="http://mondoglobo.net/images/Davy%20Jones%20records%20the%20theme%20to%20Sexina.jpg" alt="Davy Jones records the theme to Sexina">
<BR><BR>

<center><a href="http://mondoglobo.net/images/Sexina%20theme%20by%20Davy%20Jones%20(see%20PopStarPI-com).mp3">Click here to hear an excerpt from <br />Davy Jones' theme song for "Sexina: Popstar PI."</A></center>
<BR/>

"<em>Sexina</em> is a very campy film, and Davy's track blends well with the tone,"
according to the film's publicists.  It's one of 80 wildly original films being screened at the
San Francisco's Independent Film Festival, now celebrating its tenth
anniversary.  ("What we're lacking in corporate dollars, we make up for with our
devoted IndieFest filmgoers," according to founder Jeff Ross.)
To promote the festival, the organizers even came up with their own
bizarre trailer.
<BR/><BR/>
<center>	<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/oPHfe16KYuQ&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oPHfe16KYuQ&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></center>

<BR/><BR/>
And <em>Sexina, Popstar PI</em> couldn't possibly be
more indie.  It's the brainchild of Eric Sharkey, 
whose resume includes uncredited work as a production assistant on
the notorious <em>Glitter</em> (as well as <em>Vanilla Sky</em>).
He's written, directed, and produced two previous films &mdash;
though one was a four-minute short about a <em>Coney Island Alligator Hunter</em>
(Her secret weapon:  beer.)  The other film, <em>I Got Lucky</em>,
pairs a pot-head with a talking hamburger who can predict the future.

<BR/><BR/>
<div style="float:left; padding-right:10px;"><img src="http://mondoglobo.net/images/Adam%20West%20stars%20in%20Sexina.jpg" alt="Sexina starring Adam West" align="left"></div>
In his sexy new movie, Adam West, who was TV's original <em>Batman</em>, schemes in the shadows
for ways to overthrow the pop stardom of the film's singing
sensation, Sexina (played by Lauren D'Avella).  
Sexina
&mdash; real name: Maude Jenkins &mdash; 
has withstood all challengers, including a rival singer
named "Sir Stabs-a-lot." <br /><Br />But now she's facing new
competition from a narcissistic teen idol named Lance Canyon.
(Church groups complained about his controversial song, "You Need The
Extra Deep Love," but Lance responds that "My penis was touched by god.
They should just worship it.")
By day, Sexina and her bodyguard Chainsaw deal with the pressures of show
business. ("I don't want a rapping Jesus in my video!")
She's also moonlighting as a kick-ass detective. <br /> <br />"We have our best person on the case,"
says her adoring female boss.  "She's tough, smart, and very sexy.  She also has the coolest walk, and
a great smile."
<br /><br />
<!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
<BR/><BR/>
But watch out &mdash; this movie is filled with unlikely plot twists.
("Not only is G-Dog not really from Jamaica.  He's also a robot!")
Besides inspiring the young students at Britney High School,
Sexina must also investigate a kidnapping &mdash; the daughter of yet-another former
teen star.  The film's crazy mix also includes ninjas, cannibals, a man in a bear costume,
and even a brief parody of Barbara and Jenna Bush.  
<BR/><BR/>
Sharkey co-wrote the theme song's campy lyrics.  ("She has the boobs and the brains of a queen.  She's every man's
dream... ")  It's not clear there's a message in his film,
although despite the villainous Lance's anti-drug commercial, he's also a
big hypocrite.  "There's still plenty of weed, cocaine,
and ecstasy for everyone," he announces to his party guests, "as well as heroin,
crystal meth, horse tranquilizers,
vicodin, Xanax, modellng glue, yellow jackets, black beauties..."
<BR/><BR/>
Lance probably should've listened to the movie's theme song more carefully.
<blockquote>
She's wicked cool and that's a fact,<BR>
so evil-doer's watch your back.<BR>
She'll get you....
</blockquote>
<br /><br />
<center>

<img src="http://mondoglobo.net/images/Sexy%20Sexina%20title.jpg"></center><br/>
<em><a href="http://www.popstarpi.com/">Sexina: Popstar PI</a> makes its world premiere this week at the San Francisco Independent Film Festival.  Catch it Saturday (February 16) at the Roxie at 9:30 p.m.</em>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/02/15/adam-west-and-davy-jones-meet-sexina/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six Secret Lost Videos</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/01/31/six-secret-lost-videos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/01/31/six-secret-lost-videos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Destiny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/01/31/six-secret-lost-videos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will the phenomenon begin again? Some new and hidden perspectives on the struggling science fiction series.  <strong>By&#160;Destiny</strong><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[These videos shed new light on the phenomenon that is
<em>Lost</em> &mdash; or was <em>Lost</em>.  A new episode of the mind-boggling
mystery hasn't aired in nearly 8 months, and
last year saw the show lose nearly 50% of its audience.
<br /><br />
But Thursday <em>Lost</em> returns to the airwaves,
and last season's finale was even nominated for an Emmy.
Whether the series can recapture its glory,
it'll at least provide
something for TV-loving geeks
to talk about.
<br /><br />
And these videos will put it all in perspective.
<br /><br />


<strong>1.  The 117th episode?</strong><br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ox6qnWjxLrU&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ox6qnWjxLrU&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
<em>Lost</em> will end in three years, after 48 more episodes.
But hardcore fans know that the final episode already slipped out last January,
featuring surprising scenes with Sawyer, Kate, Sayeed, and Ben.
<br /><br />
Some argued that actors Evangeline Lilly and Josh Holloway only filmed a three-minute parody
to pander to geeks attending the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.
(This theory is buttressed by the fact that
Kate announces in the video that the first thing she'll do 
after leaving the island is attend the Consumer Electronic Show in Las Vegas, 
adding that the men attending the show are all "dead sexy.")  Kate also reveals 
which of the hunky castaways she prefers, Sawyer or Jack, though her answer takes an unexpected twist.
<br /><br />
<!--adsense-->
<br /><br />
It's nice to see the cast acknowledging their loyal fans,
even if they're also teasing them about the show's mysteries.
This video ultimately captures a final showdown with treacherous Ben (played by Michael Emerson, who would later be nominated for an Emmy.)  In the clip, Ben promises Sayeed "one simple unifying theory" that
explains the mysteries of the island.
(Sayeed thinks the answer is purgatory &mdash; but he's in for an annoying surprise...)
<br /><br /><br />

<strong>2.  Episode 0</strong><br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6Koj93Api_4&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6Koj93Api_4&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br /><br />
Sneak a peek at a bizarro world where there is no plane crash, or even a TV series &mdash;
just struggling actors desperate for work
<br /><br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#038;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FLost-Complete-Season-Matthew-Fox%2Fdp%2FB00005JNOG%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Ddvd%26qid%3D1201738322%26sr%3D8-1&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325">The first season DVD</A> holds the rare "audition tapes" that were recorded by
the show's actors.  As Sawyer, Josh Holloway is good-looking,
charming, and even a little bit younger.  But even more surprisingly, 
it's a world of Sawyers, since his part was also coveted by
three of the other future <em>Lost</em> actors &mdash; Matthew Fox (Jack), Dominic Monaghan (Charlie),
and Jorge Garcia (Hurley).
<br /><br />
But the most disturbing secret of all lies in Evangeline Lilly's audition tape for the part of Kate.
It apparently comes from a parallel reality where Jack, the doctor, was killed in the very first episode.
<P>
"And whatever it is that killed Jack is still out there."

<br /><br /><br />
<strong>3.  I'll Be Lost For You</strong>
<Br /><Br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/BQ7KMH4gq_A&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/BQ7KMH4gq_A&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><Br />
<br />This video suggests another little-known secret about <em>Lost</em>.
It was originally a sitcom about wacky good-looking friends living together on an island.
They frolic in the water in its original opening, their smiling faces
showing what good friends they really are.
A montage captures their warm moments of friendship &mdash; 
smiling, dancing, sharing peanut butter, and relaxing
by the flaming jets from a recently demolished airline.
<br /><br />
This video's title is "The one with the <em>Friends</em> spoof"
(even identifying one of the actors as "Matthew Fox Arquette.")
But it's letting the cast off easy.  Elsewhere on YouTube, someone actually redubbed
four full minutes footage of <em>Lost</em> footage with a sitcom laugh track.
<br /><br /><br />
<strong>4.  Sawyer's acting class</strong>
<Br /><Br />

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/p_YHV5fdUiQ&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/p_YHV5fdUiQ&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<Br /><Br />
The character of Sawyer charmed Kate, who sees tenderness under his gruff exterior.
But the other castaways usually just see his volatile temper.
<br /><br />
As the frustrations of island life mount, 
this remarkable video could be seen as a <em>Lost</em> drinking game gone
horribly wrong.  If you promised to chug every time Sawyer says
"Son of a bitch" &mdash; prepare for alcohol poisoning.
<br /><br /><!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
<br /><br />
It's surprisingly zen, a moment in time in which Sawyer's
dialogue never changes, though the world flows on around him.
Even when he's been captured and gagged,
he still manages to snarl out a 
muffled version of his trademark phrase.
<P>

		"Son of a bitch"
<br /><br /><br />
<strong>5. The magic turtle</strong>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yXzR7aKBCdE&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yXzR7aKBCdE&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
<em>Lost's</em> writers received a warning message
about the unsolved mysteries
that are starting to pile up.
(There's that smoke monster,
the eyepatch guy, 
what "The Others" want, 
the ghost of Mr. Eko...)<br /><br />
But maybe they're more interested
in discussing what would happen if Kate and
Locke <em>switched brains?  </em>
The rival writers at comedy site "SuperDeluxe"
offer a dead-on analysis of what this show's
story meetings must look like.
<blockquote>
"Everyone wakes up, and the ocean is missing!"<br />
"Everything goes backward, for two and a half years!"
</blockquote>
<br /><br />
And a comment uploaded with the video suggests what the ABC show's writers are really feeling.
<br /><br />
"It begins with the letter 'L' and rhymes with cost."

<br /><br /><br />
<strong>6. Hurley's Last Laugh</strong><br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zECDqruYbWw&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zECDqruYbWw&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
Jorge Garcia was 31 when the writers of <em>Lost</em> created the character
of "Hurley" specifically for him.
He was the first actor cast, going from
stand-up comedian to top-rated TV star,
playing the unlucky everyman who
regrets ever winning the lottery.
<br /><br />
In November of 2006, he even turned up 
on the David Letterman Show, reading
a list of "The Top Ten Signs You're Obsessed With <em>Lost.</em>"
("Number four: Your co-workers affectionately refer to you
as 'That loser who's obsessed with <em>Lost</em>.")
It speaks to the show's popularity that
each of the ten jokes triggered some
kind of recognition from the audience.  
<br /><br />
But maybe we're all just spending too much time watching TV.
<br /><br />
<strong>See Also:</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/02/16/leaving-lost-limbo/">Leaving Lost Limbo<br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/02/20/5-freaky-muppet-videos/">Five Freaky Muppet Videos</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/04/26/pulp-fiction-parodies-on-youtube/">Pulp Fiction Parodies on YouTube</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/03/26/six-freakiest-childrens-tv-rock-bands/">Six Freakiest Children's TV Rock Bands</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/07/30/democratic-cartoon-candidates/">Democratic Cartoon Candidates</A><Br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/01/31/six-secret-lost-videos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2007 Re-Mixed</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/12/29/2007-re-mixed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/12/29/2007-re-mixed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lou Cabron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/12/29/2007-re-mixed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It wasn't viral videos that defined this year.  It was the hilarious mashup videos that followed.  <strong>By&#160;Lou&#160;Cabron</strong><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<strong>In 2007 the viral video stars spawned</strong> their
own wave of counter-memes, proving
once again that the internet moves in mysterious ways.
<br /><br />
Even Barack Obama ultimately acknowledged
"the fertile imagination of the internet,"
as his fan's cranked out homegrown music videos
from a mysterious swamp of unseen creativity.
<br /><br />

But as 2007 escapes into a haze of champagne,
these videos offer a helpful 
warning to any future YouTube stars.
When <em>you</em> make yourself look ridiculous &mdash;
it's only the beginning.
<br /><br />
<strong>1. Ottoman-Humping Gigolos</strong><br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VHdvruqZwz4&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VHdvruqZwz4&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<br /><br />"Pipelayer" and his boyz &mdash;  
Relentless, X2C, Pressure, and Satisfaktion
&mdash; show the ladies their technique.
But it took internet joker Neuracnu to add Benny Hill's <em>Yakkity Sax</em>.
<br /><br />

"Despite the video's description and my big-pasty-white-guy user icon," Neuracnu told us today, "I still get private messages like:<br /><br />
<center>
<i>that video was funny please make a notherone and<br /> me @my sister and
give it to us. we are 18</i><br /><br />
</center>
His parody also provoked an angry email.  
("Ok we Gone kill yo ass......  Ha ha Bitch ass nigga u dont know what u got yo self into....")
Which, of course, ended up in another YouTube video.<br />
<br />
	<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Xf5juSa3_lQ&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Xf5juSa3_lQ&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>



<br /><br />
Eventually even Jon Stewart got involved, noting the Department of Defense had
banned all YouTube videos and MySpace pages from being viewed by
soldiers.
"If there's one thing we don't want our fighting boys
exposed to, it's guys their age with enough time on their hands
to film themselves doing this.
<br /><br />
"Ottoman-humping gigolos!  You're ruining troop morale!
<br /><br /><br />


<strong>2. Two Girls, One Frog</strong><br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nOn1htjSZic&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nOn1htjSZic&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br />
<br />
Some videos become famous for being awful, like the notorious "Two Girls, One Cup."  
Its somber music and surprise scat-eating scene spawned its own viral video meme &mdash;
footage of horrified reactions from people watching it.
<br /><br />
Everyone got into the act, including Opie and Anthony, and even a web site called 
BestReactions.com. Over two dozen clips appeared on YouTube &mdash; someone's mom, four grandmothers, and even two people who appeared to be police officers.  
<br /><br />
<!--adsense-->
<Br /><Br />Even after it found its way to Kermit the Frog, that wasn't the end.  One follow-up video showed Kermit himself couldn't resist foisting its horrific surprises on his other muppet friends.

<br /><br />

<br />
<strong>3.  Snakes on a Chocolate Rain</strong>
<br/><br/>
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZZgGGlOGyUg&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZZgGGlOGyUg&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
Tay Zonday's deep voice and pretentious
keyboards inspired imaginative re-mixes of his 
song "Chocolate Rain."  <br /><br />Tay was glad it received attention from John Mayer
and Green Day's Tre Cool. But its hard message became hilarious when the singer was replaced by a ventriloquist dummy, Darth Vader, or 
McGruff the Crime Dog
(who, like Tay, also "moves away from the mic to breathe
in.")
<br /><br />

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1oFS-q8BIps&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1oFS-q8BIps&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

<br /><br />
In November Tay teamed with rapper Mista Johnson
and Dr. Pepper for a new video, 
randomly titled <em>Cherry Chocolate Rain.</em>  
"This is the web, and it's gonna murder your TV,"
Tay warns, though he'd just stumbled inadvertently into
the next "Snakes on a Plane" &mdash; another internet meme
that proved impossible to commercialize.
<br /><br />
<div><!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
</div><br /><br />
<strong>4. Fox News 11 Meet Anonymous</strong>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hVM8euauG4A&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hVM8euauG4A&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
Fox News 11 imagined a "gang" of computer "hackers"
who attack "like an internet hate machine" 
in a sensationalistic story that
echoed through countless video parodies.
A local L.A. newscaster borrowed half-understood words
(like "Epic Lulz")
and after one victim used the word "terrorist" in a sentence,
even helpfully spliced in a picture of an exploding van.
<br /><br />
It took YouTube user "Fluffbrain" to create
an appropriately irreverent video celebrating the clip's
safety-conscious housewife, 
who not only bought a security system,
but also...a dog.  (Then the video segues to
cameo appearances by LOL Cats.)
<br /><br />
The crimes of "Anonymous" were, at worst, hoax threats,
along with minor annoyances like guessing MySpace passwords,
crank phone calls, disrupting the
children's game Habbo Hotel,  and shouting out the end of
the new Harry Potter book.
(Ironically, when Fox 11 ran a poll on their web site
asking visitors if they'd ever
been a victim of computer crime, a whopping 97% said "no.")
<br /><br />Eventually Encyclopedia Dramatica unveiled
their own equally unsubstantiated act of
journalism, arguing that Anonymous
"is in fact, a single twelve
year-old boy named Tom who has over 9000 fake AIM
accounts and single-handedly makes every single post on
the 4chan website. No one knows why..."
And the parody videos kept coming.
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XoV7VIRs9JQ&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XoV7VIRs9JQ&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
Fox finally received an authoritative rebuttal from "Lord Quadros," another YouTube user who  abandoned Fox's melodramatic music altogether, and simply replaced it with
footage from the video game Arsenal Gear.



<br /><br />
<br />


<strong>5. "Don't Tase Me, AOL"</strong><br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2mZiAaxo27s&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2mZiAaxo27s&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br /><br />

The year ended with marketers hungrily eying the success of viral
videos, while Hollywood's writers went on strike for a slice of future web revenues.
And then AOL News decided to exploit it all.
<br /><br />
They rolled parody versions of famous video stars into their own viral web commercial.
The world's unluckiest shopkeeper confronts  
Florida's tased university student, 
Miss South Carolina, and that emo vlogger who cried "LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE!!!" 
<br /><br />
If you actually visit AOL News, you'll find the real end-of-the-year headlines are a lot
less entertaining.  (For example, "Pakistan's Bhutto Assassinated at Rally.")
<br /><br />
But maybe that's why people turned to the web.<br /><br />



<b>See Also:</b><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2006/12/28/ten-video-moments-from-2006/">10 Video Moments From 2006</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2006/12/27/worst-vlogs-of-2006/ ">Worst Vlogs of 2006</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/08/21/web-fight-wikipedia-youtube-vs-perverted-justice/">Web Fight: Wikipedia, YouTube vs. Perverted Justice</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/22/youtube-the-20-year-old-and-date-unknown/">YouTube, the 20-Year-Old, and Date Unknown</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/02/20/5-freaky-muppet-videos/">Five Freakiest Muppet Videos</A>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/12/29/2007-re-mixed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Best Monster Ads</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/10/30/10-best-monster-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/10/30/10-best-monster-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Destiny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/10/30/10-best-monster-ads/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They come from Hollywood &#8212; and they'd like to sell you some tasty lite beer.  <strong>By&#160;Destiny</strong><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<strong>Monsters don't come from the Black Lagoon.</strong>  They come from Hollywood. From your TV set.  And especially &mdash; from advertising companies
<br /><br />
And so do some of the strangest licensing deals you've ever seen...
<br /><br />
<strong>1.  Frankenstein Hates This Joint</strong><br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4W40AfbhYv8&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4W40AfbhYv8&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br /><br />
It's the master work against which all other
monster/ad hybrids must measure themselves.  And also, it shows Frankenstein with arthritis problems.
<br /><br />
Granted, a shambling undead man stitched together from corpses isn't
the first thing you'd think of to promote an over-the-counter joint flexibility medication. 
But that's what makes it work. <BR /> <BR /><em>Slate</em> once observed that the ad is surprisingly memorable, even though  "nobody gets tackled or bit in the face by a ferret."


<br /><br /><br />
<strong>2.  Zombie Party</strong><br /><br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GB_LOhi8rCY&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GB_LOhi8rCY&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /><br />

The Japanese will do anything to sell you Pocky.
But a scary zombie movie?
<br /><br />
Hmm, maybe it's a little too scary.  Maybe it needs a cute girl and
a dance number.
<br /><br /><br />
<strong>3.  Ryoko the Vampire Slayer</strong>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YHNC420P3vM&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YHNC420P3vM&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
Three sexy female vampires lurking in the back seat of a car  run from four determined young men armed with their huge vampire-slaying crucifixes.
Is it <em>Buffy the Vampire Slayer</em> &mdash; or just an ad for makeup?<br /><br />

This scary Japanese ad features coffins, wooden stakes, a surprise ending, and a health tip about fighting skin cancer.

<br /><br /><br />


<strong>4.  Godzilla, King of Soft Drinks</strong><br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vvw2h0ZN9f4&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vvw2h0ZN9f4&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
He's the king of monsters, a giant
fire-breathing rebuke to mankind's
dangerous experiments with nuclear radiation.
He can shoot laser beams from his eyes.
And he's also really thirsty.
<br /><br />
As Godzilla rampages through
the city, destroying railroad tanker cars filled with wimpy
lemonade, what can save 
Tokyo's citizens from
their world of black-and-white terror?  There's only one soft drink
that can bring them deliverance,
smiles, and cheesy 80s synthesizer music...
<br /><br /><br />


<strong>5.  The Silver Bullet</strong><br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/azt5_5KLUNI&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/azt5_5KLUNI&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br /><br />
OMG!  Werewolf!  Or is it just a party animal? Or just three gay frat boys?
<br /><br />
Whatever it is, the solution is to stick a Coor's Light between your legs.
<br /><br />
<div><!--adsense#IndieClick_468--></div><br /><br />


<strong>6.  The Mummy wants Vaseline</strong><br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/swQlwjADUXQ&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/swQlwjADUXQ&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
Hey, everybody!  Let's "Walk Like an Egyptian" &mdash; to a bottle of skin lotion!
<br /><br />
18 years ago a guard's footsteps echoed through a creepy museum.
He was about to confront a terrible curse, as an ancient naked mummified female rises from the crypt to...
<br /><br />
...remind us of the skin lotion's non-greasy barrier against
the loss of natural moisturization.  Thanks, naked ancient mummified female!

<br /><br />
By the way, the person who uploaded this video to YouTube had one word for
the ancient naked mummified female.
<br /><br />
"Yummy!"
<br /><br /><br />




<strong>7.  The Creature from Aisle Eight</strong><br /><br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DBGlMQJ7Xjk&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DBGlMQJ7Xjk&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
Ever amble into the liquor store at 2 in the morning, and feel like you're a monster?  Well, you're not the only one...
<br /><br />
This is a "conceptual" ad whose slogan is "Meet You There."  Maybe it 
means your nightmares will meet you halfway &mdash; that some
half-demon sea monster lurks to possess you if you start down the road of degradation signaled by Heineken beer.
<br /><br />
Or maybe it's just another cute monster ad.
<br /><br /><div><!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
</div><br /><br />


<strong>8.  Dracula's Favorite Beer</strong><br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IkMPCl9usQE&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IkMPCl9usQE&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br /><br />

Oh my god! Dracula is about to indulge that
Transylvanian woman on the balcony
with some sexy neck foreplay, and...
no wait.  All he wants is a beer.
(Am I right, ladies?)
<br /><br />
Then again, what do you expect from a guy who's wearing a cape?  But at least it turns out those fangs are good for something else.  (No, not that.  The other thing...)  




<br /><br /><br />
<strong>9.  Sigourney Weaver vs. Aliens</strong><br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/BfEWtMOnCkA&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/BfEWtMOnCkA&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br /><br />
I thought <em>Alien</em> was the scariest movie I'd ever seen, and its first sequel was even scarier.  But it turns out Sigourney Weaver had a different motivation
when she attacked the giant queen alien.
<br /><br />
"All I wanna do is kick back and enjoy the <a href="http://directtv-vs-dishnetwork.com/">DirectTV</a> I just hooked up."
<br /><br />
Yeah, right.  So there's not a scared little girl named Newt
cowering under the spaceship's deck grating?  You just wanna watch TV?  Thanks for spoiling the moment...
<br /><br /><div>
<!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
</div><br /><br />

<strong>10.  Elvira: Mistress of the Vegetarians</strong><br /><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8w1YdCUjzCE&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8w1YdCUjzCE&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br /><br />No one's done more for Halloween than Elvira
&mdash; including a lot of bad commercials
for Coor's Light.  But last year she rose from the dead
to deliver a fierce warning to the monsters of the
world.
<br /><br />
"Silly zombie.  Flesh-eating is for worms."
<br /><br />
So go vegetarian, Elvira urges.  (It's an ad
for PETA directed by Andy Dick.)
Though Elvira always gives me the urge 
to celebrate Halloween with a  cool, refreshing
Coor's Light...
<br /><br />
Does anybody else feel like getting drunk and watching
monster movies?<br/><br/>


<b>See Also:</b><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/10/31/lost-horrors-ending-found-on-youtube/">Lost "Horrors" Ending Found on YouTube</A><BR>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/03/26/six-freakiest-childrens-tv-rock-bands/">Six Freakiest Children's TV Rock Bands</A><BR />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/04/26/pulp-fiction-parodies-on-youtube/">Pulp Fiction Parodies on YouTube</A><BR />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/10/30/10-best-monster-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Gay Were the Hardy Boys?</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/10/29/how-gay-were-the-hardy-boys/</link>
		<comments>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/10/29/how-gay-were-the-hardy-boys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Destiny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/10/29/how-gay-were-the-hardy-boys/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did the original author of <em>The Hardy Boys</em> hide secret jokes inside the books?  <strong>By&#160;Destiny</strong><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://mondoglobo.net/images/The%20Great%20Hardy%20Boys%20Adventure%20(top).jpg" alt="The Great Hardy Boys Prank">
<br /><br />


<strong>He hated the Hardy Boys.</strong> But he <i>wrote</i> the Hardy Boys.
Did their original author hide secret jokes inside the famous children's detective books?
<br /><br />
"In his diaries, my father talks about having to write another of those
cursed books," the author's son told one interviewer, "in order to earn another
$100 to buy coal for the furnace."
("It was very good money during the Depression,"
Leslie McFarlane recalled in a radio interview forty years later.  Both interviews are linked from the author's entry on Wikipedia.)<br /><br />

But over 100 million books have since been published with the boy detectives he brought to life.
"A royalty of even a quarter of one percent would've been all right,"
he added wistfully...  <br /><br /><!--adsense-->
<br /><br />

<div style="float:right; padding-right:10px; padding-top:4px;">
<img src="http://mondoglobo.net/images/Leslie%20McFarlane%20original%20author%20of%20the%20Hardy%20Boys.jpg" alt="Leslie McFarlane, original author of the Hardy Boys" hspace=10 vspace=5>
<BR><center><font size=2><I>Ghost Writer Leslie McFarlane</i></font></center>
</div>
In 1926, a 24-year-old McFarlane
accepted a short-term contract position which led to his writing the first sixteen Hardy Boys titles under the pseudonym Franklin W. Dixon.  "I never did learn what the 'W' represented," he groused in a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#038;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FTower-Treasure-Hardy-Boys-Book%2Fdp%2F1557091447%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks%26qid%3D1193208808%26sr%3D1-2&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325">commemorative introduction</A> later.  "Certainly not Wealthy."
<br /><br />


It's the mystery of the disgruntled ghost writer, as I discovered when reading the original 1929 version of <eM>The Secret of the Caves</em> and found myself wondering:  Are there dirty jokes hidden between the lines? He'd "inject his wonderful sense of humor," McFarlane's daughter once remembered, to make the writing project  "palatable."
<br /><br />
"And then he'd finish and say, 'I will never write another juvenile
book.' But then the bills would pile up and he'd start another..." 
<br /><br />
It's been 80 years since the Hardy Boys mysteries first appeared, and
the change in our language is hard to miss when the two brothers
first begin investigating a ring of car-stealing smugglers, and their best friend describes his stolen vehicle.

<blockquote>
"The car is pretty well known around Bayport," said Chet.  "It was certainly a gay-looking speed-wagon."
</blockquote>
<br />



Wikipedia argues the word gay "implied a willingness to disregard conventional or respectable sexual mores...as early as the 1920s."
<br /><br />

<table style="margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 10px" width=245 border=0 align=left>
<tr>
<td>
<img src="http://mondoglobo.net/images/Tie%20Up%20the%20Hardy%20Boys%20(big).jpg" alt="The Shore Road Mystery - original 1928 illustration"></td></tr>
<tr><td>
<font size=2><I>
<em>Original caption: "We'll tie them up until we figure out what to do with them."</em>
</i></font></td></tr></table>





In his 1928 book <em>The Shore Road Mystery</em>, McFarlane had accidentally chosen words whose meanings were changing, I thought. But the same accident recurred just a few pages later, when the boy's aunt Gertrude
argued they shouldn't post bail for farmer Dodd's son.  "You can't rely on men who don't have
a woman around the house to keep them straight."
<br /><br />
Interestingly, McFarlane's publishing syndicate had given him strict instructions on how to portray the boys' romantic lives, he revealed in the commemorative introduction.  "It was intimated that relations between the Hardy Boys and their
girl friends would not go beyond the borders of wholesome friendship
and discreet mutual esteem."
<br /><br />Was the book's author wryly hiding double entendres as a backhanded
slap at his employer and their straitjacketing guidelines?
<br /><br />
Or do readers in the 21st century just have dirty minds...
<br /><br />
<div><!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
</div>
<br />
I've agonized over this question, but if it's true, then McFarlane's magnum opus was a 1929 masterpiece of dirty double meanings called &mdash; what else &mdash; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#038;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FSecret-Caves-Hardy-Boys-Book%2Fdp%2F1557091501&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325">The Secret of
the Caves</A>.  Within a few chapters, an elderly male shopkeeper is warning the Hardy Boys and their two male friends
to stay away 
from the mysterious beach because "There's some queer things been goin' on down there lately."  And what exactly
does that mean, asks the Hardy Boys' friend &mdash; Biff.

<blockquote>
"Nobody knows.  But there's been queer lights seen down around them caves.
And shootin'.  Guns goin' off.  Mighty queer doin's, they say..."
<br /><br />
Chet whistled softly.  "This sounds good!  We may stay longer than we had intended..."
</blockquote>
<br />

Wikipedia says the word "queer" already had sexual overtones by the late
1800s. <br /><br />
<img src="http://mondoglobo.net/images/Hardy%20Boys%20cover%20-%20The%20Secret%20of%20the%20Caves.jpg" alt="Hardy Boys covers - The Secret of the Caves" align="right" vspace=6 hspace=10>McFarlane's book even detours to report that the females in the book were feeling left out.

<blockquote><I>
"I wish I were a boy," sighed Callie Shaw.
<br /><br />
Iola Morton looked up from her ice-cream soda.  "Me, too."

</i></blockquote>
<br />

"It's tough luck that you're not," agrees Joe Hardy in chapter six, but unfortunately,
exploring strange caves is a men-only job.  McFarlane opens chapter eight by telling us that "The Hardy boys and their chums spent the night at a hotel in a small village..."
<br /><br />


The four teenagers are on summer vacation, so there's time for some sleuthing. 
When they buy camping supplies, the old shopkeeper re-iterated again that it's a dangerous cave full of queer
doin's, and Frank "smiled at this thrust."
<br /><br />
But his younger brother Joe was even more enthusiastic.

<blockquote><I>
"The one thing we're afraid of is a quiet outing.  Excitement," he added
slangily, "is our meat."
<br /><br />
"Ye'll get lots of it if ye go pokin' around them caves," the old
gentleman predicted.
</i></blockquote>
<br />
Maybe that was the book's rejected first title &mdash;  <em>Excitement is Our Meat.</em>
<br /><br />
In any case, by chapter 15, the four friends have started exploring the caves.
There's a lot of darkness and candles, but apparently the four lads
aren't alone.  Within a few pages, the chums are approached by a strange looking old man.

<blockquote><I>
"What a queer duck he is!" exclaimed Biff.
<br /><br />
"I'll say he is!" ejaculated Chet Morton.
</i></blockquote>
<br />
So <I>that's</i> the secret of the caves...
<br /><br />
<div><!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
</div><br />

I wouldn't have said anything, except for an earlier scene
where Frank Hardy regains consciousness in one of the cave's pits
&mdash; and the narrator uses a tell-tale adverb.

<blockquote><I>
[W]ith the aid of the rope, and with Joe and his chums pulling lustily,
Frank was soon hauled to the top...
</i></blockquote>
<br />
It's a strange book.  The Hardy Boys' cave does prove to be filled with
pits, but for the most part McFarlane's story records the mystery of the missing
mystery.  Until chapter 17, which veers suddenly into startlingly unwholesome territory.
<br /><br />
<center>
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#038;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FSecret-Caves-Hardy-Boys-Book%2Fdp%2F1557091501&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325"><img src="http://mondoglobo.net/images/hardy%20boys%20covers%20-%20the%20secret%20of%20the%20caves.jpg" border=0 hspace=9 alt="The Secret of the Caves - The Hardy Boys - original 1929 cover"></A></center>
<br /><br />
<blockquote><I>They were just approaching the cliff that hid the cave from view when
Frank halted and peered through the fog at the base of the rocks some
distance ahead.
<br /><br />
"Do you see somebody lying there, Joe...?  Seems like a man sprawled on the sand...."
<br /><br />
The boys hastened across the rocks in the direction of the figure on the shore...
<br /><br />
They came up to the man sprawled on the sand.  He was not dead.  An empty
bottle lying by his side told the reason for his slumber.
<br /><br />
"He's drunk!"
</i></blockquote>
<br />

So "The Secret of the Caves" is &mdash; they have a liquor license?

<blockquote><I>
He was quite senseless from the effects of the liquor he had drunk...

"This is luck!" exclaimed Frank.
</i></blockquote>
<br />
Uh-oh...

<blockquote><I>

"What shall we do with him? asked Joe.
<br /><br />
Frank groped in his pocket and produced a length of stout cord.
<br /><br />
"We'll tie him up first!"  
</i></blockquote>
<br />
Say, what kind of beach is this, anyways?
<br /><br />
The Hardy Boys had apparently identified their sexy smuggler as an escaped criminal
who's wanted by the police &mdash; and their stars are lining up.

<blockquote><I>
"What if he puts up a fight?"
<br /><br />
"He's too drunk."
</i></blockquote>
<br />
They throw hat-fuls of water into in his face to revive him &mdash; but 
when he wakes up, they keep throwing more water at him.

<blockquote><I>
"Hey!  What's this?" roared the car thief indignantly.  He had just
discovered that his wrists were bound.
<br /><br />
"Just a little joke," said Frank.
<br /><br />
Water was streaming down the man's face.  He was thoroughly aroused by now.
</i></blockquote>

<br />
"I'll say he is!" ejaculated Chet Morton.
<br /><br />
The Hardy Boys prevailed, and eventually turned their captured smuggler over to the police.
I don't know if they then lit a cigarette &mdash; but I decided I didn't need to read any further. I'd already guessed the secret of the caves.
<br /><br />
But one tantalizing
mystery about the Hardy Boys remained.  How could such a wildly popular detective series
be created by a man who was so ambivalent about them?  And could he really write a total of 21 Hardy Boys books without leaving behind a hint of his true feelings?

<br /><br />
As the years ticked on, Leslie McFarlane dreamed of writing a great epic novel about the
Canadian north.  But instead, he lived just long enough to see the Hardy Boys turned into a cheery Saturday morning cartoon with their own faux-60s rock band.
<br /><br />
<center>	<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GNS6HhtElLo"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GNS6HhtElLo" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></center>
<br /><br />

McFarlane's creations continued marching through the decades, with the books' texts suffering major revisions to keep up with a changing world.  Ben Stiller and Tom Cruise are even reported to be collaborating on a new movie based on the characters called <em>The Hardy Men</em>.<br /><br />

Shortly before his death, a radio interviewer surprised Leslie McFarlane, then in his 70s,
with a quiz about his original ending for <em>The Shore Road Mystery</em>.
In the book, the Hardy Boys had investigated the baffling disapperances of cars
along the old shore road.  So who committed the crime?
<br /><br />
"I haven't the foggiest idea," the author answered.  "And I don't really care."<br /><br />
But last year in an interview with the newspaper of McMaster University, McFarlane's daughter 
shared a haunting memory.  At the end of his life, he'd delivered one last sad and final irony.
<br /><br />
"You know, I think people are only going to remember me for those damn books."
<br /><br />
<center><em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#038;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FSecret-Caves-Hardy-Boys-Book%2Fdp%2F1557091501&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325">Click here to purchase McFarlane's original 1929 text <br />for The Secret of the Caves</A></em></center><br /><br />



<B>See Also:</b><br />


<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/04/12/when-kurt-vonnegut-met-sammy-davis-jr/">When Kurt Vonnegut Met Sammy Davis</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2006/11/20/5-lamest-charlie-brown-cartoons/">Five Lamest Charlie Brown Cartoons</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/11/the-cartoon-porn-shop-janitor-carol-burnett-vs-family-guy/">The Cartoon Porn Shop Janitor: Carol Burnett vs. Family Guy</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/09/24/five-druggiest-high-school-sitcom-scenes/">The Druggiest High School Sitcom Scenes</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/03/26/six-freakiest-childrens-tv-rock-bands/">Six Freakiest Children's TV Rock Bands</A><br />

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/10/29/how-gay-were-the-hardy-boys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Art or Bioterrorism: Who Cares?</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/09/26/art-or-bioterrorism-who-cares/</link>
		<comments>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/09/26/art-or-bioterrorism-who-cares/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RU Sirius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics, Law & War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/09/26/art-or-bioterrorism-who-cares/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FBI detained artist Steve Kurtz for 22 hours. But when tests proved the bio-chemicals he'd had were completely harmless &#8212; they prosecuted him anyways. <strong>By&#160;RU&#160;Sirius</strong><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://mondoglobo.net/images/strange.jpg" alt="Strange Culture film" />
<br /><br />
<strong>The Emergency Response Team</strong> might have thought they'd stumbled upon an underground bioterrrorist's laboratory. 
<BR /><BR />
On May 11, 2004, 911 received a call from SUNY Buffalo University professor and artist Steve Kurtz reporting the death of Kurtz's wife Hope from heart failure. The responders entered the home where Kurtz worked on his projects for Critical Arts Ensemble (CAE) &mdash; projects which explore and critique bio-issues like our contemporary use of biotechnology for weapons programs, reproduction, and food. The responders noted a table with scientific equipment and peculiar substances that are an essential part of Kurtz' work. 
<BR /><BR />
The FBI detained and questioned Kurtz for 22 hours.  His house &mdash; and his wife's body &mdash; were confiscated. Kurtz' entire street was quarantined while agents from numerous agencies, including Homeland Security and the Department of Defense, descended on his home in hazmat suits. Everything was confiscated – computers, books on bioweaponry, garbage, posters with "suspicious" Arabic lettering on them… everything.
<BR /><BR /><!--adsense-->
<br /><br />

After about two days, the authorities had tested the biological materials and declared that no toxic material had been found. On May 17, Kurtz was allowed to return to his home.
<BR /><BR />
Whoops! 
<BR /><BR />
So did the authorities apologize to the grieving professor before busying themselves with pursuing real crimes and threats? Not on your life!
<BR /><BR />
Despite the Public Health Commissioner's conclusions about the safety of Kurtz's materials, and despite the FBI's own field and laboratory tests showing they weren't harmful to people or the environment, the Justice Department still sought charges under the U.S. Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, as expanded by the <em>USA PATRIOT Act &mdash; Prohibitions With Respect to Biological Weapons.</em> 

<BR /><BR />
A federal grand jury rejected the charges, but instead handed down indictments with two counts each for "mail fraud" and "wire fraud." According to the CAE, the charges "concern technicalities" about how Kurtz obtained "$256 worth of harmless bacteria for one of CAE's art projects." (Robert Ferrell, former head of the Department of Genetics at the University of Pittsburgh's School of Public Health, and a collaborator on several of CAE’s projects, now facing charges along with Kurtz)  In this interview, Kurtz characterizes the charges even more bluntly.  "The Department of Justice can drop a major felony on someone for filling out a warranty card incorrectly and mailing it."
<BR /><BR />
To bring more attention to the case, film director <a href="http://mondoglobo.net/neofiles/show-2-lynn-hershman/">Lynn Hershman Leeson</a> (<em>Teknolust,</em> <em>Conceiving Ada</em>) has released a unique new film, <em>Strange Culture.</em> Starring Tilda Swinton, Peter Coyote, Thomas Jay Ryan, and Josh Kornbluth &mdash; plus Kurtz himself &mdash; the film effectively communicates the story while also reinventing the documentary genre in Leeson's unique style.
<BR /><BR />
<center><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ikNO1ANHIQs"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ikNO1ANHIQs" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></center>
<BR />
<em>Strange Culture</em> was screened in the virtual world of Second Life as part of the 2007 Sundance Festival, a first for the festival. The film has also been screened in Los Angeles, Albequerque, Chicago, Buffalo, Seattle and Minneapolis and is just finishing up showings in San Francisco and San Rafael on September 27. The film has not gone into conventional release, but 
future showings are planned for New York City. 
<BR /><BR />


<strong>RU SIRIUS:</strong> Describe the project you were working on that caused you to have the materials that caused law enforcement officials to go nuts.
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>STEVE KURTZ:</STRONG> Three projects seemed to really bother law enforcement. Critical Art Ensemble was working on a biochemical defense kit against Monsanto’s Roundup Ready products for use by organic and traditional farmers. That was all confiscated.
<BR /><BR />
We had a portable molecular biology lab that we were using to test food products labeled “organic” to see if they really were free of GMO contaminant.  Or, when in Europe, to see if products <em>not</em> labeled as containing GMOs really had none. We'd finished the initiative in Europe and were about to launch here in the U.S. when the FBI confiscated all our equipment.
<BR /><BR />
<div><!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
</div><BR />
Finally, we were a preparing project on germ warfare and the theater of the absurd. We were planning to recreate some of the germ warfare experiments that were done in the '50s (which were so insane that they could only have been paid 
for with tax dollars). We had two strains of completely harmless bacteria that simulated the behavior of actual infectious diseases &mdash; plague and anthrax. To accompany these performances, we were in the middle of a manuscript on the militarization of civilian health agencies in the U.S. by the Bush administration. <BR /><BR />Everything described was
confiscated. We had to start from scratch on the project and the book. Happily, we did eventually do the experiments, and published the book &mdash; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/157027178X?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=157027178X"> Marching Plague: Germ Warfare and Global Public Health.</a><BR /><BR />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Would you say that originally, they authentically suspected they had found some sort of bioterror weapon, and once they realized they hadn't, they found other reasons to remain hostile?
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>SK:</STRONG> What I think they thought was that they had a situation, along with a vulnerable patsy, out of which they could manufacture a terrorism case. After all, the rewards that were heaped on the agents, prosecutors, and institutions that brought home the so-called “Lackawana Six sleeper cell” case &mdash; another railroad job &mdash; were witnessed by others in these agencies and noted. This made it too lucrative to pass up turning anything they could into “terrorism”.
<BR /><BR />
They also had plenty of other reasons to be &mdash; and remain &mdash; hostile.
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Could you describe the scene of the raid? Did they use a lot of weaponized overkill?
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>SK:</STRONG> I really don’t know any more than anybody else about that. At the time of the real action, I was at the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0972952993?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0972952993">Yes Men’s</a> compound in Troy, NY. (Due to the initial media circus, I was told by my lawyers to leave town for a few days.) From what I can tell from the news footage and the reports of neighbors, the entire alphabet soup of the federal investigative agencies was launched. Each took a turn entering my home wearing hazmat suits with guns drawn, and proceeded to do their “bioterrorism” exercises.
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG>  Oh, I had the impression that the entire situation involving your wife's death, the discovery of the materials, and the raid all happened fairly instantly. Did this scene stretch out over days?   
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>SK:</STRONG> It did stretch out a ways. Even though I was illegally  “detained” for 22 hours the day after my wife’s death and they had confiscated my house, the raid didn’t begin. It took a few days for them to assemble all the troops and to obtain a search warrant.
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> And did they think you were trying to avoid arrest since you were hiding?
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>SK:</STRONG> No. I was out of town on advice of my attorneys. I had already been in custody and released. They knew they only had to contact my lawyer and I would self-surrender. 
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG>  This must have all been a tremendous strain, coming as it did coupled with the death of your wife. Can you describe some of the thoughts and emotions you had around all this?
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>SK:</STRONG> I think all adults know the feelings of intense grief and depression that are brought about by the loss of a loved one. My feelings were in no way unique. But when you spice it with the adrenalin and the hyperanxiety of being attacked by the full weight of federal forces, which in turn causes all your survival instincts to really kick in, you have a bad trip from which you are not going to come down for a long time. In my case, it was six months or so before I started feeling anything approaching normal. This close proximity to mortality stemming from two different extremes (loss and attack) creates a feedback loop that turns your brain into static. Patterns of thought, emotion, and behavior deconstruct and seem to lose any identifiable point of origin. I was a zombie&mdash; an animated organic mass with modest brain function.
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Have you run into particularly Kafkaesque scenarios given this cases' attachment to The Patriot Act and Homeland Security?
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>SK:</STRONG> The case has been a hyperreal, bureaucratic grind, but I have yet to wait endlessly in any hallways not knowing why I was there or what I was charged with.
<BR /><BR />
<div><!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
</div><BR />

<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Explain a little bit more about the project you were planning around these materials related to biological warfare and theater of the absurd.
<BR /><BR />
<strong>SK:</strong> We did the projects. You can see them at our website at critical-art.net. We just recreated a couple of the experiments that different militaries did to see if germs were viable candidates for weaponization. <br /><br />For the British Plague experiments, Critical Art Ensemble went to the Isle of Lewis in Scotland where they had originally been done. The British tests started south of this location and were land-based, but the results were so appallingly bad from a military perspective that they began to believe that the only way infectious disease could possibly be of use militarily was as a tactical ship-to-ship weapon. To test this idea they moved to an even less populated area (the Isle of Lewis). They put a bunch of monkeys and guinea pigs on a pontoon and started shooting germs at them in both powder and wet forms from about a mile away &mdash; a very difficult shot in the blustery weather of Northern Scotland. 

<BR /><BR />
The infection rates were again poor, and included a fishing vessel that unsuspectingly sailed through the experiment. The British Navy had to follow the vessel to make sure it didn’t land or make physical contact with other ships until they were sure no one on the boat was infected. No one was. The only conclusion reached from this experience was to move the test to the colonies &mdash;  in this case, the Bahamas.<Br /><br />
Critical Art Ensemble did the same thing, only we recreated  the harmless simulant tests (not the actual plague tests), and only used guinea pigs overseen by the SSPCA &mdash; no monkeys. Our results were just as bad, so it seems as if we reliably replicated the test. CAE went to the end of the world to shoot bacteria at guinea pigs. <br /><br />Can there be a more absurdist gesture than that? Well yes &mdash; one: Bush reinitiating a failed germ warfare program at public expense and at the cost of civilian interests in world and national health policy. The Bush administration is usurping public civilian agencies (such as the CDC and countless universities) and using them to play out the administration’s fantasies of a terrorist germ warfare attack. The resources to study infectious diseases are limited, and it's criminal to use them for a remote “what could be” scenario at the expense of real, ongoing health crises like AIDS, TB, hepatitis, malaria, and other diseases that are killing <em>millions</em> every year.
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> I never thought of CAE as a really obscure project, since I'd read various manifestos or statements by you and seen stuff about you here and there. And yet, outside the avant-garde art community, very few people know about this bizarre and outrageous case. Do you think this says something about our cluttered and diffuse culture.  
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>SK:</STRONG> I think you have stated the situation as well as I can. Information is ubiquitous and overwhelming. Only so much can be processed in a day. And when you think of how many outrages are occurring each day because of the war and the 
current U.S. constitutional crisis, who has time to follow one of the many ridiculous court cases brought by the Department of Justice? <BR /><Br />One has to be motivated by a very direct interest in the case to take notice, no matter how precedent setting the case might be. In my case, the Department of Justice is attempting to completely implode civil and criminal law, but if you are not in the arts and sciences, there’s too many other events and situations to worry about.
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Is there some way we can make it more difficult for arbitrary authority to pick off people who are on the so-called fringes?
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>SK:</STRONG> I have no idea. The FBI has been a Dr. Jekyll/Mr Hyde type of institution from its inception. While I am happy for its work against organized crime, for example, I have always been completely outraged by its continuous assault on those individuals and sometimes entire communities (as with the current attack on peoples of Islamic faith) who openly express ideological difference. The FBI has worked against socialists and communists from the 20s through the 60s, and 
against the equal rights movements of the same period. <br /><br />The COINTELPRO operations of the 60s and 70s are basically back, so exercising our rights is more risky than ever, but it’s for that very reason we must. Rights are won and kept 
through struggle, and in our struggle to preserve our Constitution, it pains me to say that the FBI is and has always been one of the anti-democratic enemies.
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> What do you think abour Lynn Hershman's film, <em>Strange Culture</em>? 
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>SK:</STRONG> It’s inspirational and well worth seeing. It has brought awareness about the case to new audiences.


<BR /><BR />

<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Did you participate in the creative direction at all?  
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>SK:</STRONG> No.
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> What kind of effect do you expect from it?
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>SK:</STRONG> Exactly what it’s doing &mdash;  bringing an awareness of the case to people and communities that otherwise would not hear about it.
<BR /><BR />

<div><!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
</div><BR />

<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> According to the CAE defense fund FAQ, you were originally charged  under prohibitions on biological weapons, but a grand jury instead handed down indictments related to "wire fraud" and  "mail fraud." And then it also states that the terrorism charges could come back to haunt you. <BR /><br />I wonder how your attorneys are coping with all this. Are they simply trying to get across the absurdity of the whole mess, or are their any legal fine points?
<BR /><BR />
<STRONG>SK:</STRONG> What they have been arguing in motion hearings is that the Department of Justice is making an absurd interpretation of the mail fraud law. The DoJ has thrown away its guidelines (which state my case should not be prosecuted) and interpreted the law in a way that is unique for my situation. <br /><br />My co-defendant Bob Ferrell and I are the first citizens to ever be indicted for mail or wire fraud because we supposedly broke a material transfer agreement. The “defrauded” parties do not believe we did anything to harm them &mdash; the crime is a DoJ fantasy that they hope to prove. We’ll see at trial if rationality prevails. <br /> <br /> If it doesn’t, the case will set a precedent that will mean that the Justice Department can drop a major felony on someone for filling out a warranty card incorrectly and mailing it. This will be a major tool for them. Talk about being able to pick off people at will!

<BR /><BR />
<blockquote>Lynn Hershman Leeson invites <em>10 Zen Monkeys</em> readers to sponsor showings of the film. For sales and exhibition information contact:
hotwirelh@aol.com<BR /><BR /><a href="http://www.strangeculture.net/">Strange Culture Screenings</a><BR /><a href="http://www.caedefensefund.org/">Critical Arts Ensemble Defense Fund</a></blockquote>
<BR /><BR />

<strong>See Also:</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/04/10/homeland-security-follies/">Homeland Security Follies </A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/01/10/hallucinogenic-weapons-the-other-chemical-warfare/">Halluncinogenic Weapons: the Other Chemical Warfare </A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2006/11/28/is-it-fascism-yet/">Is It Fascism Yet? </A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2006/10/23/detention-and-torture/">Detention and Torture: Are We Still Free, or Not?</A>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/09/26/art-or-bioterrorism-who-cares/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Druggiest High School Sitcom Scenes</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/09/24/five-druggiest-high-school-sitcom-scenes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/09/24/five-druggiest-high-school-sitcom-scenes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Destiny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/09/24/five-druggiest-high-school-sitcom-scenes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drugs, high school, sitcoms and YouTube.  It's going to be a strange trip. <strong>By&#160;Destiny</strong><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<BR />

<strong>They put the "high" in high school.</strong>  <br /><br />While drugs are a complicated experience, TV shows are not. So when the characters in a show about high school students tackle the issue of illicit substances &mdash; the characters are in for some very funky trips.<br /><br />
And so is the audience...


<br /><br />
<B>1.  Freaks and Tweaks</b>
<br />
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xR3NOR6ILKE"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xR3NOR6ILKE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
Judd Apatow captured the existential moment every stoner faces when Lindsay smoked Nick's stash on a very special episode of <I>Freaks and Geeks</i>.  A paranoid Lindsay isn't worried about losing high school innocence, but <em>reality itself.</em>
<br /><br />
As acoustic guitars play a come-down tune, there's a beautiful speech about having faith, even from the other side of an altered reality.  But ironically, after this episode aired, the entire series was cancelled &mdash; and Lindsay's whole universe really <I>did</i> cease to exist.
<br /><br />
<B>2.  That 70s Bust</b>
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZlTOPjcyQLs&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZlTOPjcyQLs&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

<br /><br />They'd already smoked pot for over eight years. In their <a href="http://www.memorybook.com/highschool.html">high school yearbook</a> they even wrote "What a long strange trip it's been....in Eric Foreman's basement." <BR /><br />
But in one extra groovy episode of <em>That 70s Show</em>, Eric's hard-assed father Red finally catches the whole gang lighting up.  And then  the four stoned teenagers endure a histrionic lecture in the kitchen as its wallpaper seems to sway with trippy special effects
<br /><Br />"Who taught you how do to this?!  Was it <a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/01/03/paul-mccartney-on-drugs/">those damn Beatles?"</A> <BR /><br />
"It's like Amsterdam down there!"


<br /><br />
<B>3. Saved by the <a href="http://store.femnutrition.com/caffeine-pills.html">Caffeine Pills</a> </b>
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bflYjF90t7c"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bflYjF90t7c" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<br />
<br /><em>Saved By The Bell</em> was notorious for its feel-good storylines
&mdash; about personal responsibility, loyalty among friends, and the 
soul-crushing dangers of caffeine pill addiction.
<BR /><BR /><!--adsense-->
<br /><br />
In another episode, the cast also turned their backs on a pot-smoking TV star 
and recorded an explicit anti-drug message with NBC President Brandon Tartikoff. 
Although not all their fans agreed.
<BR /><BR /> By the time that scene hit the internet, it was looking a
little different... <BR /><BR /> 
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ru7OYVSagxI"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ru7OYVSagxI" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<BR /><BR />
It's all right.  In the comments at YouTube, one party-pooper points out that the clip has obviously been edited.  ("He originally says, <I>Don't</i> do drugs, then they
all say, "There's <I>no</i> hope with dope!")  If you watch closely,
someone's even tampered with the closing credits, which now
urge viewers to phone the NBC <I>pot</i> line &mdash; to get a free sample.<BR /><Br />
And a third commenter just says he couldn't stop marvelling at <a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/01/09/screechs-sex-tape-follies/">Screech's</A> tripadelic shirt.
<BR /><BR />

<B>4.  Welcome Back, Uppers</b>
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pm9ULeuCqmA"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pm9ULeuCqmA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<BR />
<br />Epstein and Barbarino act like "we took some of them pills" in an earnest anti-drug episode of <em>Welcome Back, Kotter</em>. Unbeknownst to them, Horshack has already wolfed down a real handful of uppers, and their pretend stupor is complimented by &mdash; well, with Horshack, it's kind of hard to tell.
<br /><Br /><div><!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
</div><br />
They'll scare Freddie "Boom Boom" Washington into going straight &mdash;
especially with 25-year-old high school student
John Travolta acting like
"one of them druggie people. Real dum-like.  'Gimme drugs. Gimmie drugs...'"  
<br /><br/>Ultimately
their six minutes of play-acting prove that it takes more than good intentions to cure drug
addicts.  It also takes some bad examples.

<Br /><Br />


<B>5.  The Brady Bong</b><br />

<embed src="http://www.broadcaster.com/video/external/player.swf?clip=pilgarlic_892969_1466307729.flv" quality="high" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="340"> </embed><BR /><br />

As Mr. Brady pulls the station wagon into the driveway, he discovers his son Greg is acting a little "dopier" than usual.
But 17-year-old actor Barry Williams wasn't fooling anyone...
<br />
<blockquote>
<B>Greg:</b> ...far out!!
</blockquote>
<br />

In real life, Williams was stoned, as later investigations proved, in an <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000B5XOUM?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=B000B5XOUM">episode</a>  of <em>The Brady Bunch</em> which was &mdash; ironically &mdash; titled "Law and Disorder."  (Young Bobby Brady is appointed the school's safety monitor, but misses tell-tale signs of obvious reckless behavior...)

<br /><br />This is where the two worlds come together &mdash; the fake TV family, and the actors caught in the middle. Ultimately Barry Williams decided that his legendary drug scene represented just another form of play-acting.  In his <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0967378508?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0967378508">autobiography</a>, he wrote that "Getting stoned instead left me...feeling as phony as the turf in the Brady's backyard.<BR /><Br />

"Maybe I should've just smoked that." 

<BR /><br />
<strong>See Also:</strong><br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/03/26/six-freakiest-childrens-tv-rock-bands/">Six Freakiest Children's TV Rock Bands</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/01/03/paul-mccartney-on-drugs/">Paul McCartney on Drugs</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/05/20/dustin-diamond-celebrity-fit-club/">Dustin Diamond vs. Sgt. Harvey</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/02/12/apple-computer-mac-sex-videos/">The 5 Sexiest Apple Videos</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/07/23/the-simpsons-on-drugs-6-trippiest-scenes/">The Simpsons on Drugs: Six Trippiest Scenes</A>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/09/24/five-druggiest-high-school-sitcom-scenes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rodney Brooks&#8217; Robots are Fast, Cheap, and Out of Control</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/09/21/rodney-brooks-robots-are-fast-cheap-and-out-of-control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/09/21/rodney-brooks-robots-are-fast-cheap-and-out-of-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RU Sirius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/09/21/rodney-brooks-robots-are-fast-cheap-and-out-of-control/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He's an MIT Professor of Robotics and the CTO of iRobot Corporation &#8212; and this video catches him asking the ultimate question about the coming robotics revolution.  <strong>By&#160;RU&#160;Sirius</strong><br />
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<strong>On September 8  the world's geekiest geeks</strong> gathered at San Francisco's Palace of Fine Arts to talk about what happens if/when we make machines that are smarter than we are. 10ZM.TV was there just in case The Singularity came early, though as far as we could tell, things are more or less the same as they were a few weeks ago. So we think it's still safe to flip off your TV when Geraldo comes on.
<br /><br />
We captured several of the guest speakers on video, as well as several esteemed members of the audience, and we'll present them here over the next few weeks.  For our first presentation we snared Rodney Brooks, a Professor of Robotics at MIT and co-founder and Chief Technical Officer of iRobot Corporation.<br /><br /><!--adsense-->
<br /><br />
Professor Brooks strolled into the Singularity Summit with a headful of robots.  For the last twenty years there's been a squadron of 1,000 one-kilogram robots in his head, capable of doing the work of NASA's two-ton Mars Explorer robots.  In the decades that followed his influential paper &mdash; "Fast, Cheap, and Out of Control" &mdash; he's grappled with a coming robotics revolution &mdash; and its implications for humanity.<br /><br />
Will robots be weaponized?  Will their personalities adhere to the Geneva Convention?
And what about the dangers of nanotechnology machines? <Br /><br />
10ZM.TV captured Brooks' thoughts on artificial intelligence, synthetic biology, and the ultimate question &mdash; what makes something alive?


<center><br />
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://blip.tv/scripts/pokkariPlayer.js?ver=2007082501"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://blip.tv/syndication/write_player?skin=js&#038;posts_id=392553&#038;source=3&#038;autoplay=true&#038;file_type=flv&#038;player_width=&#038;player_height="></script>
<div id="blip_movie_content_392553"><a rel="enclosure" href="http://blip.tv/file/get/10zenmonkeys-RodneyBrooksBuildsRobots438.m4v" onclick="play_blip_movie_392553(); return false;"><img title="Click to play" alt="Video thumbnail. Click to play"  src="http://blip.tv/file/get/10zenmonkeys-RodneyBrooksBuildsRobots438.m4v.jpg" border="0" title="Click To Play" /></a><br /><a rel="enclosure" href="http://blip.tv/file/get/10zenmonkeys-RodneyBrooksBuildsRobots438.m4v" onclick="play_blip_movie_392553(); return false;">Click To Play</a></div>
<p>										</center>

<br />
<B>See Also:</b><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/03/19/official-launch-10zm-tv/">Rudy Rucker on Computation</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/03/14/michael-crook-settlement-apology/">"Dear Internet, I'm Sorry"</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/01/19/joe-quirk-author-singularity-sociobiology-sex/">Why Chicks Don't Dig The Singularity</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/14/how-the-internet-disorganizes-everything/">How the Internet Disorganizes Everything</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/05/18/give-me-immortality-or-give-me-death/">Give Me Immortality or Give Me Death</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/03/09/whatever-happened-to-virtual-reality/">Whatever Happened To Virtual Reality?</A><br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/09/21/rodney-brooks-robots-are-fast-cheap-and-out-of-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://blip.tv/file/get/10zenmonkeys-RodneyBrooksBuildsRobots438.m4v" length="44932027" type="video/mp4" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democratic Cartoon Candidates</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/07/30/democratic-cartoon-candidates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/07/30/democratic-cartoon-candidates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 21:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lou Cabron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics, Law & War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/07/30/democratic-cartoon-candidates/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want to be President, you can't be afraid to step into a cartoon. <strong>By&#160;Lou&#160;Cabron</strong><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br />
<strong>Pundits claim that in 2008,</strong> the issues will magically fuse with a Presidential candidate's personality &mdash; and reflect the ultimate wishes of the American people. So which hopes and dreams will rise to the surface?
<br /><br />
Ask the people who've already imagined the candidates into cartoons.  Their "one step from reality" videos reveal a sort of enhanced "hyper truth."  Or at least, the truth as 
seen by six wise guys on the web.

<br /><br />
<strong>1.  Super Size Me</strong><br /><br />
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Wr0MLl-fxuo"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Wr0MLl-fxuo" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
The Democrats' "excitement" over their '08 candidates may just be relief &mdash; that George Bush won't be President any more. Capturing this glee is a Saturday morning cartoon showing the Bush administratration as "The Legion of Doom."  And they're about to get their asses kicked by a team of Democratic superheroes.
<br /><br /><!--adsense-->
<br /><br />
In this dream world, Karl Rove is transformed from an evil prince of political disinformation into The Joker, and Condoleeza Rice becomes Catwoman.  They've teamed up with arch villians Bush and Cheney for a "conquest of the universe" &mdash; but four Democratic Presidential candidates are flying to the rescue.    Hillary Clinton appears as Wonder Woman &mdash; of course &mdash; and Barack Obama is "Captain United." Former attorney John Edwards gets a special crest on his chest &mdash; the scales of Justice.  And Al Gore isn't the Green Lantern, he's "The Green Solution".
<br /><br />
At the end of the video, there's even a pointer to a web site analyzing their various super powers.  Hillary Clinton's weakness?  
<br /><br />
"A severe aversion to interns."
<br /><br />
<strong>2.  Barack Obama: More than Meets the Eye?</strong>
<br /><br />
<embed src="http://www.stupidvideos.com/player.swf?sa=1&#038;i=32900&#038;uid=" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="452" height="371"></embed>
<br /><br />
America ignores the primaries until Labor Day, focussing on summer blockbusters instead. But one voter imagines the world-conquering robots from <em>Transformers</em> taking a break from dominating the box office to discuss...Barack Obama.
<br /><br />
Sure, he's set fund-raising records, but are we being blinded by his skillful speechmaking? Even "Optimus Prime" can't stop talking about the Obama phenomenon. There's thoughtful questions about his experience &mdash; could Obama handle a nuclear Iran? Or maybe the Transformers should be voting for Bill Richardson.
<br /><br />
But ultimately this video demonstrate the most powerful truth of all. That most political conversations in America devolve into nothing but personal attacks and defensiveness.

<br /><br />
<strong>3.  Hillary Clinton: Please Don't Hurt Me.</strong>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6Pn-jZbEnIE"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6Pn-jZbEnIE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
It's not any particular position, just...a weird vibe. Hillary Clinton is the front runner.  Hillary Clinton scares people.
<br /><br /> To be fair, the former First Lady (and former lawyer) endured eight years of right wing vilification, and it's given her a tough skin. But one Mason-Dixon poll found that more voters reported a negative reaction to Hillary than a positive one.
Despite her name recognition, she remains an enigma &mdash; everyone thinks they know her, but no one knows why. While inventing her political self, Hillary's moved from "the left" to "the center" and even to "the right."  But it's not that.  It's just...something.
<br /><br />
YouTube user "thefreemind" has created a video he's labeled "My opinion" that captures this disconnect. It offers the electorate one simple message.
<br /><br />
Hillary Clinton?  Please don't hurt me.
<br /><br />
<strong>4.  John Edwards meets Hanna Barbera</strong>
<br /><br /><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WP7QnQ46zD4"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WP7QnQ46zD4" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

<br /><br />
Electability!  That's what Democrats crave most.
<br /><br />
So while John Edwards babbles on about that war in Iraq and the need for universal health care, there's a secret second message. Just think how many Electoral College votes he could win!
<br /><br />
With an earnest, low-key delivery, Edwards packs the charisma of Bill Clinton &mdash; the only Democrat who actually won the Presidency in the last 21 years. And it's that charming Southern accent that gives him extra empathy points. Who does he remind you of?
<br /><br />
<!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
<BR /><BR />
Here's a hint.  Southern voters include "yellow dog Democrats" &mdash; who are said to be so loyal they'd vote for a yellow dog if it were running as a Democrat.   But this video asks a related question. Would they also vote for a blue cartoon dog wearing a bow tie?
<br /><br />
There's also a second political truth.  While creating this video, user "Meadowfrost" ignored everything Edwards said about warring factions in Iraq &mdash; and then spliced in dialogue from a Huckleberry Hound cartoon.
<br /><br />
That tells you everything you need to know about the American electorate.
<br /><br />
<strong>5.  The Good, the Bad, and Bill Richardson</strong><br/><br/>
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/X0juSJ-y9xg"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/X0juSJ-y9xg" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
When Bill Richardson ran for governor in 2006, his campaign came up with a full-fledged western in 30 seconds. But at least there was a point to mimicking old movie cliches &mdash; as governor he claimed credit for "$600 million worth of movie production."
<br /><br />
It's a cartoon of sorts &mdash; a sugary over-simplification of both the campaign and its candidate.  (What will they call the sequel &mdash;  <I>A Fistful of Bill Richardson</i>?) But political ads always reveal the inner thoughts of hired political consultants, and how they're privately viewing the electorate. In this case, their message seems to be: voters won't listen without a feel-good story.
<br /><br />
And sadly, the consultants are probably right.
<br /><br />
<strong>6.  An Inconvenient Al Gore</strong>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/98VT44zaCJg&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/98VT44zaCJg&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
After years of being called a robot, Al Gore finally appears with one. Al Gore's daughter is a writer for Futurama, and to promote <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000ICL3KG?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=B000ICL3KG">An Inconvenient Truth</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=neofilesradio-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B000ICL3KG" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />, Gore appeared in a cartoon with <em>Futurama's</em> robot, Bender.
<br /><br />
Our former Vice President says he's not seeking his party's nomination &mdash; but no one believes him. Instead, Gore's denials are seen as a brilliant stealth campaign that includes both <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000ICL3KG?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=B000ICL3KG">An Inconvenient Truth</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=neofilesradio-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B000ICL3KG" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> and this year's Live Earth campaign.  In an age of <a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/19/youtubes-5-sorriest-questions-for-the-2008-presidential-candidates/">YouTube debates</A> and viral video, voters have more media options than ever, and if Al Gore enters the race, he may have unwittingly revealed the most inconvenient truth of all.
<br /><br />

If you want to be President, you can't be afraid to step into a cartoon.
<br /><br />

<strong>See also:</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/07/18/senator-vitters-suppressed-statement/">Senator Vitter's Suppressed Statement</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2006/12/07/the-5-faces-of-bush/">The 5 Faces of Bush</A><BR />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/03/05/john-edwards-virtual-attackers-unmasked/">John Edwards' Virtual Attackers Unmasked</A><BR />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2006/10/04/5-nastiest-campaign-ads-so-far/">5 Nastiest Campaign Ads So Far</A><BR />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/19/youtubes-5-sorriest-questions-for-the-2008-presidential-candidates/">YouTube's 5 Sorriest Questions for the 2008 Presidential Candidates</A><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/07/30/democratic-cartoon-candidates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;The Simpsons&#8217; On Drugs: 6 Trippiest Scenes</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/07/23/the-simpsons-on-drugs-6-trippiest-scenes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/07/23/the-simpsons-on-drugs-6-trippiest-scenes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 23:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Vaughan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/07/23/the-simpsons-on-drugs-6-trippiest-scenes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We re-cap  some of the "high" points of what is arguably the world's foremost pop culture institution. <strong>By&#160;Don&#160;Vaughan</strong><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://mondoglobo.net/images/homer.jpg" border="1" alt="Homer Simpsons Smokin' Weed" /><br /><br />

<div style="float:left; padding-right:10px; padding-top:4px;">

<script type="text/javascript">digg_url = \'';</script>
<script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script>

</div>
<strong>It's no secret</strong> &mdash; <I><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/search?ie=UTF8&#038;keywords=the%20simpsons&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;index=dvd&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325">The Simpsons</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=neofilesradio-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /></i> has relied as heavily on drug humor as <i>Diff'rent Strokes</i> did on "whatchootalkinboutwillis." Ranging from binge drinking to marijuana use to LSD-like hallucinations, all the members of the Simpson clan &mdash; and a great many other residents of Springfield &mdash; have enjoyed a wide variety of drug-induced exploits. 
<br /><br />
The trailer for the new feature film indicates there's at least one upcoming instance of Homer craving something psychotropic, saying, "More, please!" to an Indian chief's flaming brew. But until its theatrical release on July 27th, let's re-cap  some of the "high" points of what is arguably the world's foremost pop culture institution.
<br /><br />


<strong>6.  Guatemalan Insanity Peppers</strong>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JNWYuRGcBbk&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JNWYuRGcBbk&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
Drug blog Dosenation.com calls it a highlight of <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/search?ie=UTF8&#038;keywords=the%20simpsons&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;index=dvd&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325">The Simpsons</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=neofilesradio-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />'</em> "nods and winks to the drug-using populace." Exquisitely crafted in theme and form, this segment could be seen as the ultimate tribute to the psychedelic drug experience, complete with self-discovery, adventure and even an animal guide (a coyote with the voice of Johnny Cash).  
<BR /><BR />
We imagine <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/search?ie=UTF8&#038;keywords=the%20simpsons&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;index=dvd&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325">The Simpsons</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=neofilesradio-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /></em> writers are especially proud of this 1999 episode.  Notice when Homer first swallows the psychotropic pepper, he says, "More, please" &mdash; the exact line he's now using in the new movie's trailer.  Maybe the writers are sending a secret signal to all Homer's fans in the drug culture:
<BR /><BR />
<em>He's still a druggie after all these years.</em>
<BR /><BR />

<b>5. "Wow, that saxophone would make a great pipe."</b>
<br /><br />
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/M-CiNrHXisQ&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/M-CiNrHXisQ&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
<br /><br />

Homer gets a prescription for marijuana. Marge is troubled, the kids bemused, but Homer, who indulges as expected, is also conflicted. His remedy: "Do as I say, not as I do."
<br /><br />
In other episodes, Homer...
<br />
<ul>
<li>Has insomnia and watches a late night TV commercial for "Nappien," which "won't cause foot-fattening or elbow stink."</li>

<li>Takes expired medication he finds in a neighbor's trash. When Marge tells him to stop, he says, "But Marge, what if I'm not getting enough ... [glances at label] ... estrogen!"</li>

<li>Invents a drink &mdash; the Flaming Homer, a.k.a. the Flaming Moe &mdash; in which the main ingredient is children's cough syrup.</li>

<li>Gets the entire town of Springfield high when he distributes a beverage made from carrots and peyote.</li>

<li>Takes another man's medications while visiting his father in the nursing home. Grandpa comments, "The pink ones keep you from screaming."</li>

<li>Gets high on cleaning-chemical fumes and hallucinates that he's being attacked by Scrubbing Bubbles, Mr. Clean, and other characters.</li>

<li>As he and Ned Flanders drive to Las Vegas, they pass a car driven by a warped and hallucinating Hunter S. Thompson as drawn by Ralph Steadman.</li></ul>

And of course, Homer's fondness for Duff beer is legendary.

<br /><br />



<b>4. "What am I smokin'? Oh yeah..."</b>
<br /><br /><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0rHXoXUzFeY&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0rHXoXUzFeY&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
About as straightforward as possible &mdash; even in German &mdash; -- and without any apology. Otto the bus driver is portrayed as smoking pot while driving the kids to school.
<br /><br />

<!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->

<BR /><BR />
In other episodes, Otto...
<ul>
<li>Complains about blatant false advertising as he storms out of a housewares store called "Stoner's Pot Palace."</li>
<li>Is told by Mettalica to never listen to their music again, ostensibly for being a druggie.</li>
<li>Mistakenly answers this true-or-false question while practicing for his driving test.
"Alcohol improves your ability to concentrate."
</li>

</ul>
<b>3. Marge's LSD?</b>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LgWPL_wlUT4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LgWPL_wlUT4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
Marge Simpson hallucinates that the walls are melting, and that a roasting turkey is talking to her, after she drinks tainted tap water.  (Shown here in an extra-trippy version that was redubbed for foreign markets.)
<br /><br />
In other episodes, Marge...
<br />
<ul>
<li>Attends the Broadway play <i>Kickin' It</i>, "a musical journey through the Betty Ford Center," with the kids during a trip to New York.   
</li>
<li>Is maliciously portrayed in a political ad as saying "Now it's time to do some coke off the blade of a knife..."</li>
<li>Has a false-positive test for crack and PCP after taking a parenting course. Confesses to being high on LSD, "love for my son and daughters."</li>
<li>Checks into a rehab clinic herself after excessive drinking with Homer.</li>

</ul>


<b>2. Naked in the Fermentarium</b>
<br /><br />

Lisa has LSD-like hallucinations after drinking the water while on a ride at Duff Gardens. Proclaims, "I can see the music," and "I am the lizard queen!"  (Homer had been binging on an enormous sandwich he'd brought home from the company picnic, and sent her to the park with her Aunt Selma.)
<br /><br />
In other episodes, Lisa...
<ul>
<li>Becomes addicted to "Trucker's Choice" brand speed, a gift from Bart.</li>

<li>Has LSD-like hallucinations featuring The Beatles after receiving nitrous oxide at the dentist's office. Later in the same episode, the entire family gets high when the dentist accidentally leaves the gas on.</li>

<li>Comments to Bart that the air at a Hullabalooza music festival "smells like Otto's jacket," a reference to their pot-smoking school bus driver (see below).</li>
<li>Comments that the pot smoke emanating from Homer's room "smells like the art teacher's office."</li>

</ul>

<b>1. "Ow! My Bones Are So Brittle."</b>
<br /><br />

Bart Drinks "malk" at school, "now with vitamin R" (a slang term for Ritalin).
<br /><br />
In other episodes, Bart...
<ul>

<li>Gets drunk on beer during a St. Patrick's Day parade.</li>

<li>Asks Marge to pick up some "Flintstones chewable morphine" when he gets the flu.</li>
</ul>
And in 1990, federal "drug czar" William Bennett made headlines when he warned patients at a drug treatment center that watching <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/search?ie=UTF8&#038;keywords=the%20simpsons&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;index=dvd&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325">The Simpsons</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=neofilesradio-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /></em> was "not going to help you." (He'd spotted a Bart Simpson poster on the wall that said "Underachiever &mdash; and proud of it.")  Later when he made a conciliatory offer to sit down and talk to Bart, Matt Groening issued a counter-statement on behalf of Bart.  <br/><br/>"If our drug czar thinks he's going to have a conversation with a cartoon
character, he must be smoking something." 
<br /><br />
Do you have a favorite <em>Simpsons</em> drug reference?  Tell us which ones we overlooked in the comments.<BR /><BR />




<B>See also:</b><BR />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/11/the-cartoon-porn-shop-janitor-carol-burnett-vs-family-guy/">The Cartoon Porn Shop Janitor: Carol Burnett vs. Family Guy</A><BR />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/01/03/paul-mccartney-on-drugs/">Paul McCartney on Drugs</A><BR />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/05/03/ten-worst-spiderman-tie-ins/">10 Worst Spider-Man Tie-Ins</A><BR />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/01/10/hallucinogenic-weapons-the-other-chemical-warfare/">Hallucinogenic Weapons: The Other Chemical Warfare</A><BR />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/06/10/the-great-wired-drug-non-controversy/">The Great Wired Drug Non-Controversy</A><BR />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/04/26/pulp-fiction-parodies-on-youtube/">Pulp Fiction Parodies on YouTube</A><BR />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/07/23/the-simpsons-on-drugs-6-trippiest-scenes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Wozniak v. Stephen Colbert &#8212; and Other Pranks</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/07/03/steve-wozniak-v-stephen-colbert-and-other-pranks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/07/03/steve-wozniak-v-stephen-colbert-and-other-pranks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RU Sirius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/07/03/steve-wozniak-v-stephen-colbert-and-other-pranks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Wozniak talks about his punking the Secret Service, ethical phone phreaking, and programming the Apple II by hand.  <strong>by&#160;RU&#160;Sirius</strong><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br />
<img src="http://mondoglobo.net/images/wozniak.jpg" alt="Steve Wozniak in the Mondo Studio" />
<br /><br />

<div style="float:left; padding-right:10px; padding-top:4px;">
<script type="text/javascript">digg_url = \'1';</script>
<script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script>

<script>reddit_url='http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/07/03/steve-wozniak-v-stephen-colbert-and-other-pranks/'</script>
<script>reddit_title='[TITLE]'</script>
<script language="javascript" src="http://reddit.com/button.js?t=2"></script>
</div>

<strong> Steve Wozniak showed up</strong> at our San Francisco studio riding in fine style… on a Segway. He had told me via email that he would just park anywhere in the city, and I imagined this multimillionaire going to some exclusive garage where he has a permanent spot and then flagging down a taxi. But since he was the Segway's first customer, I imagine that his riding skills – by now – would allow him to easily beat a Yellow Cab across town, particularly on a day that featured a gay pride parade and a Giants game.
<br /><br />
The legendary Apple inventor was much in circulation this winter and spring, promoting his hit autobiography, written with Gina Smith, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0393061434?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0393061434">iWoz: From Computer Geek to Cult Icon: How I Invented the Personal Computer, Co-Founded Apple, and Had Fun Doing It</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=neofilesradio-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=0393061434" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />. When we had Smith on our NeoFiles podcast a few months back to talk about the book, <a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2006/12/07/apple-wozniak-biographer-interview-smith/">she told us</A> that all Wozniak ever wanted to talk about was the pranks he'd pulled. So we figured we'd give him his big break and invited him to come on the show to talk pranksterism.
<br /><br /><!--adsense-->
<br /><br />
We <em>did</em> get to talk a bit about technology as well. But, sorry to say, that other Steve apparently never gave him a free iPhone to play with, and this was prior to his heroic crowd management stint during the iPhone release at the Apple store in Santa Clara, so Wozniak had little to say about the greatest thing since… <em>the Segway?</em> (OK. That was uncalled for. Sorry.) 
<br /><br />
Futurist <a href="http://openthefuture.com">Jamais Cascio</a> joined me in conversing with Woz. Cascio helped to start WorldChanging, a site dedicated to Open Source problem-solving that often focuses on solutions to global warming. After the show, they started talking about that situation and it transpired that Wozniak is, in Cascio's words, "a bit of a climate-change denialist." Cascio and Wozniak have agreed, in theory, to a brief email discourse on the topic for <em>10 Zen</em> (although it seems that we have more enthusiasm for this than they do.) We hope that this will be forthcoming.
<br /><br />
<blockquote>To listen the full interview in MP3, <a href="http://mondoglobo.net/neofiles/show-83-steve-wozniak-talks-about-his-favorite-pranks/">click here</a>.</blockquote>
<br /><br />

<strong>"I Took Him (Colbert) Down!"</strong>
<br /><br />

<strong>RU SIRIUS:</strong> You've been touring and appearing on behalf of your bio. You even got to face Colbert…
<br /><br />
<strong>STEVE WOZNIAK:</strong> Not only did I get to face him, I boasted to a <em>San Francisco Chronicle</em> reporter two days before the show that I was going to take him down. I'm usually pretty witty about turning conversations my way. Anyway, she quoted me in her blog. So now I'm heading out to Stephen Colbert's show with a blog on the internet saying I'm going to take him down. Man, I played so many good pranks on him backstage.
<br /><br />

And I took him down on the show! I didn't plan it.  I figured, I'm going to be a punching bag. This guy is good. But I knew they were going to treat me with kid gloves by the pre-interview they did over the phone. He asked one wrong question. He asked, "Have you pulled any pranks lately?" I said, "Well, I take my steak knife onto airplanes." And that was the line that caught him wavering &mdash; "Do I go my way, or do you I go your way?" And he sort of went my way a bit. He said, "I'll get you on a list." I said, "I <em>want</em> to be on the list!  Anyone who knows me knows I'd <em>love</em> to be on all the lists there are."  And I managed to pull these thin metal credit cards that are thin as a knife out of my pocket. And I <m>do</em> cut steak on airplanes with 'em. And I think he sat there just twiddling his hand without anything to say because he was worried that we had crossed over into homeland security… you know, a crime reported on television!

<br /><br />

<embed FlashVars='config=http://www.comedycentral.com/motherload/xml/data_synd.jhtml?vid=76007%26myspace=false' src='http://www.comedycentral.com/motherload/syndicated_player/index.jhtml' quality='high' bgcolor='#006699' width='340' height='325' name='comedy_player' align='middle' allowScriptAccess='always' allownetworking='external' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' pluginspage='http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer'></embed>
<br /><br />
<embed FlashVars='config=http://www.comedycentral.com/motherload/xml/data_synd.jhtml?vid=76006%26myspace=false' src='http://www.comedycentral.com/motherload/syndicated_player/index.jhtml' quality='high' bgcolor='#006699' width='340' height='325' name='comedy_player' align='middle' allowScriptAccess='always' allownetworking='external' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' pluginspage='http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer'></embed>
<br /><br />

<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> He definitely looked confounded. And you say you were goofing on him in the green room as well?
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> Oh my gosh!  I was sort of trying to let him know my personality. So you know how at the Presidential Press Corps Dinner, Stephen Colbert was the host and he came on and said, "Oh my god, I got to sit right next to the man! President Bush!" So I walked up to him and I said, "Oh my god!  I get to meet and touch the man himself!  How nice to meet you, Mr. Stewart." And then I pulled out some two dollar bills that I always carry around...
<br /><br />
I have pads of sheets of these bills. They're perforated like green <a href="http://www.123print.com/Stamps">stamps</a>. You can tear 'em off in ones, or twos, or threes or fours. And he grabbed it out of my hand and ran out to the hallway where there was more light. He held it up to the light. He was so concerned!  I'm thinking, "Why is he so concerned about something that I just use as a prank here and there?" And he's looking at it for the longest time, feeling the paper and analyzing the different pages. So he tells me that his brother works for the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, where they print the money on 14th street in Washington, D.C., which is where I buy these.
<br /><br />

<strong>Woz Punks the Secret Service</strong>
<br /><br />

<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Now this is legitimate money that people assume is...
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> It meets the specs of the U.S. government, so by law, it is legal tender. The Secret Service has approved it three times. Why would they approve it if it's not legal?  I don't even know if it has the right President's face on it. And the serial numbers &mdash; there's something very suspicious about them. The bills &mdash; you can smell the ink is still fresh so don't get it on your finger. And I'll sell a sheet of four of them &mdash; that's $8 &mdash; for $5. But not very many people buy them from me. I start saying, "Since they cost me three, you're really buying $12 worth for $5. <em>(ed: we don't understand it either.)</em>  Only an idiot would turn that down."  And that's about the time they start thinking, maybe I won't buy them. And they won't buy 'em. I give myself a point if they don't buy 'em, because they <em>are</em> legal tender.  
<br /><br />
The Secret Service read me my Miranda rights once. And when they asked for an ID, I pulled out this ID that I'd used for every airplane flight for five years of my life. It says "Laser Safety Officer, Secretary of Defiance" (instead of Secretary of Defense) on the card, and in the photo I'm wearing an eye patch. <em>(laughter)</em> And the Secret Service didn't catch that it was a phony card!  They figured out that the bills were good and legal tender, too. <a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2006/12/07/apple-wozniak-biographer-interview-smith/">Gina (Smith)</a> didn't put this one in the book!  A lot of my good prank stories didn't get in the book. That's the third book that I have planned.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Good lord. The things you can get away with when you're Steve Wozniak.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> You know, I think any actor and comedian that can just act like they're in the right can do it &mdash; that's mainly what it takes.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Bluffing is the main thing. Bluffing is social engineering, basically.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> Yeah. The attitude is, "What I'm doing is right," you know? And then it's real easy. People get real nervous and try to hide stuff when they think what they're doing is wrong.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Gina said some people buy the two dollar bills and don't think that they can use them.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> Sometimes they buy them and think they should cash them in a real dark place, so they don't get caught.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG>  Why do you think you wound up being such a prankster?

<br /><br />
<!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->

<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> It's because I was so shy in middle school and high school. I had to kind of have a way to have a presence. Everyone's born with an energy to socialize &mdash; to mix with other people. And when you're shy and can't talk to them; and they start to talk weird language that you don't want to be part of; and they're snooty about the people who are "in" and "out"; and you aren't part of that "in" group &mdash; it's very intimidating. So one of the ways I communicate is with pranks. 
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> So, if you're at a party, do you do a prank to get attention?  Or...
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> Oh no no...
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Or just to get <em>(laughs)</em> vengeance on the snobby people?
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> No, its not that. But in my school days, I wasn't in the group that would ever get invited to a party. But I was kind of friendly with a lot of druggies back in the late 60s at our school. And they were "out"-ies and techies and all that. But I didn't go to their parties either. The way I thought about it &mdash; I looked at church, and I said, "You know what? Everybody goes to church and they're saying those same words together, and they're singing the same songs together. And they're just following the exact same ligature. Everybody's doing the same thing. I don't want to be a follower like that. I've got a brain!  I'm going to think out what is right and what's wrong, to do in the world. I don't need to be like everybody else and just follow their lines. Well, I extended that to parties and to that druggy peer group. We always talked about, "Don't conform!" Don't conform to the values of your parents.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Right. But on the other hand, everybody must get stoned.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> All the peers in our high school – everybody was going to the parties and doing the same things. And they were drinking because other people were. That's conforming. So I thought, if I'm going to drink, I'm going to drink all alone because I think it's something I want to do. And it kept me kind of clean, because I wouldn't just go out and do something because my group's doing it.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> So there's an iconoclasm there. 
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> Yeah!
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Back to pranks…
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> I have these professionally printed stickers that I've had made. They're done with this sort of foil-type stuff in the exact OSHA style and the OSHA colors. And it says, "Danger: Do Not Flush Over Cities."  And I put 'em in the bathrooms on airplanes...
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> <em>(Laughs)</em> I think I've <em>seen</em> that, actually. Do you fly Jet Blue?
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> Yes, I have done it on Jet Blue.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> I remember thinking about it and wondering what that was!
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> They're red with a black-shadowed airplane picture. The bathroom has a little seat fold-down. I fold that up and there's a sign in the middle of it saying, "Don't throw trash here." And I put my two little stickers behind it, so the stewardesses won't notice it right away. If they notice it right away they might realize that somebody put that there. But after a while, if they slowly get used to it, they'll stay on for years.
<br /><br />
I have another sticker that I made in OSHA style and colors. It's a yellow one. I put it in the backstage bathroom at the "Colbert Show." It has a little graphic of a butt with a poof coming out and it says, "Keep our air fresh."
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> In <a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/01/12/a-selection-of-obscure-robert-anton-wilson-essays/">Robert Anton Wilson's</a> book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0440539811?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0440539811">The Illuminatus! Trilogy</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=neofilesradio-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=0440539811" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />, there's this character, Markoff Cheney, who leaves weird bureaucratic commands in offices and places like that just to sort of boggle people's minds.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> That's almost like what I read about in the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/007028380X?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=007028380X">The Pentagon Papers</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=neofilesradio-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=007028380X" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> – the psychological warfare. You kind of put out a message saying one thing, but it implies that something horrible is going to happen just because you're saying that it isn't going to happen. It triggers bad thought in people's mind.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Cognitive dissonance...
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> Yeah!
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> ...is a great weapon of war, and also of...
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> … comedy!
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG>  …guerilla pranksterism, and all those things. I guess you're indicating that pranks challenge conventional behavior.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> Absolutely. I've always very much wanted to be a rebel, and against authority. Because if we just sort of accept authority, and never question it &mdash; we just go through a life without knowing what truth really is &mdash; thinking we know it all. Everybody reads the same headlines and sees the same seven-second soundbites on TV. And because they all know the same thing as everyone else, they're all in the right. "We are all intelligent." They're <em>not</em> intelligent. They just saw the same things and repeated it. You know? They're the ones who aren't intelligent. I mean, the definition of intelligence in schools is pretty much being able to know what every other kid in the school that has studied the book would say... and not to have original thought of your own.
<br /><br />

<strong>When Woz Convinced the Waitress He was "a Pavarotti"</strong>
<br /><br />

<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Speaking of getting an education and then getting a shitty job, Gina told me a story about a prank on a waitress.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> Yeah... I did a prank on a waitress recently. And I put a lot more energy, time, and even money into my pranks than most people. I don't want all my pranks to be just the normal duds you play every day. You know, every comedian will have one gem of a joke for every ten duds. So I play little dinky pranks all day long. 
<br /><br />
But in this case, it was based on the fact that I have season tickets to Warriors' games and I had special passes for a special parking lot. So one time, I took a friend in the back seat of my car who didn't know I had the pass. And as I got to the window, I tell the guy there that we have the guy with us who's going to sing the national anthem. And then to embarrass him (the guy in the back seat), I'd say, "Sing a line for him!"  and the guy can't sing but they let us in anyway, and...
<br /><br />
So I had done this sort of prank a few times. And then I was at a restaurant in San Francisco, and I knew that I had four tickets for Saturday's game but I  wouldn't be there. So I asked the waitress, "Hey, you going to the game on Saturday? I'm singing the national anthem!" And she looked at me like I was the most important person she'd ever waited on. I didn't expect that, but now I had to play with it. When someone's mind is thinking something weird, or in a… I call that a creative state. You don't want to inhibit creativity. You want to keep it going. So you always say yes. So I said, "Oh!  I could probably get you some tickets from the Warriors staff &mdash; you know, if you want..." And then I said, "You want to hear me sing?" And she says, "Yes!" And I go (half-speaking) "Oh say can you see." And that's the best I can sing. Everyone at the table started laughing. So I figured the jig was up. But then I heard from Gina later on that this waitress had come over to Gina, and asked privately, "Does he really sing the national anthem?" And Gina said, "Oh, he's a famous opera singer!  He's got the voice of an angel!" <em>(laughter)</em>
<br /><br />
So now I had to follow through. I had to take this one further. So I came back to the restaurant one day and left two tickets for the waitress. And I set up a story that my friend Jim would have my other two tickets. And he was supposed to tell her I got food poisoning at the restaurant. I was a Pavarotti, and in the hospital they had mixed me up with somebody else and taken my kidney out. They'd discovered the mistake, switched operating teams and gloves and they'd put my kidney back in. (I always love to throw in the glove line. Like they'd <em>really</em> switch gloves.) And I'm the first person to ever get a kidney transplant [from myself]. Great story.  
<br /><br />

<strong>The Zaltair Prank: Two Pranks in one</strong>
<br /><br />

<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> You make really elaborate schemes and stories. Talk about some of the pranks that were left out of your book. Maybe go back to the early hacker days, or Apple times?

<br /><br />
<!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->

<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> Early hacker days? There's the prank that I did when we introduced the Apple II. At this time, all these people were using Z words based on the new Z80 Microprocessor from Zylog. So I had these fake brochures for "the Zaltair" made. It was this two-sided brochure that had all the fakest hype I could think of using, like – "Imagine a car with five wheels!"  You know, stupid little things that were inspired by the worst ads I'd ever read. It had comparison charts to things like the Apple and it looked <em>so</em> phony &mdash; but it was against the Apple and this and that. It said you could send your own computer in and get a $120 discount. It was really jamming MITS Corporation, but that's another story.
<br /><br />
I took thousands of 'em in a box and put it out in front of The Civic Auditorium (in San Francisco). After a while, my friend called me. He said, "Somebody took the box. It was gone!"  But MITS &mdash; the company that I was making fun of &mdash; wasn't there. So who did it?  It turns out, they had a rep there. So we went to the hotel and brought another box and set it down. After a while a guy goes up, he spots it and takes the box away. So then, we took tons of them underneath our coats and went around and started shuffling them into packets. Our green ones would go into packets of green handout fliers, and our blue ones would go into packets of blue fliers. We were careful about it but we got thousands of 'em distributed. I mean, all the members of the Homebrew Computer Club were waving copies in the air.
<br /><br />
And I'd put a stupid made up quote from Ed Roberts &mdash; the President of MITS &mdash; at the top. And if you took the first letter in each word in the quote, it spelled P.R.O.C.E.S.S.O.R T.E.C.H.N.O.L.O.G.Y. You always get two pranks for one if you frame someone else. 
<br /><br />
And sure enough, Gordon French, who was one of the Homebrew club members, came by Apple in the early days, and I asked him,  " Did you hear about that Zaltair prank?" And he said, "Oh yeah, it was a hoax. I know who did it! Gerry Egram of Processor Technology!... because he's got a weird sense of humor." I'm laughing my head off at this point. And I pull one out and said, "There was supposed to be a cipher in here."  And they started reading the cipher, and everybody read the letters "Processor Technology."  Steve Jobs did the final 'Y'. For 12 years, everybody "knew" that this guy at Processor Technology had done the prank.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> When did you 'fess up?
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> Twelve years later. I actually framed a copy and gave it to Steve Jobs as a birthday present. He opened it up in a restaurant and he just started laughing out loud. And that's unusual.
<br /><br />

<strong>Ethical Pranking</strong>
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Your most famous prank, which is in the book, was when you called the Pope at 5 am pretending to be Henry Kissinger. What was going through your mind as you were doing that? 
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> I used one of the blue boxes... the blue boxes were an exciting time in my life &mdash; around 1971.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Was John Draper with you when you did the call?
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> No, he wasn't. I read articles about him. He had stimulated my interest. I had quickly tried to whack together a blue box but it didn't work. I finally designed a great little digital box. It worked every single time. And Steve Jobs said, "Let's sell 'em." So we built some and sold them. We gave door-to-door demonstrations in the dorms. Can you imagine doing that and not getting caught?  
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Right. That was the perfect time for phone phreaking. Everyone was interested.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> By the end of that year, I was worried that they had methods to catch 'em, so I never did 'em after that year. And during that year, I was careful that I didn't use the blue box for personal calls. I paid for them. It was partly out of fear, but also I wanted to be honest, as I thought Draper and others were. We only want to explore the system, and fix it, and find its little flaws, and tell other people. That's a great thing to a technical person &mdash; to know a few little flaws. It's like finding a few little Easter eggs in a program &mdash; little secret surprises. Since I was very shy, it gave me one area of life that I wasn't shy about.
<br /><br />
I was the demonstrator. I was the emcee. I would demonstrate the blue box for an hour or two. We sold one every time we did a demonstration!
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG>  I'm sure lots of other people just used them to get free phone calls.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> Yeah, and ethically, when I look back...
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> I think that was part of the spirit of the early '70s.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> Yeah, but when I look back I have a problem with that.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Well, phone phreaking was associated with <a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2006/11/19/counterculture-and-the-tech-revolution/">The Yippies</a> and a kind of anti-corporate radicalism. You didn't quite get into that...
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> I wasn't in there. Sure, I admired all those thinkers…
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Right. I mean, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/search?ie=UTF8&#038;keywords=abbie%20hoffman&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;index=books&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325">Abbie Hoffman</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=neofilesradio-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> had that kind of stuff in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/156858217X?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=156858217X">Steal This Book</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=neofilesradio-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=156858217X" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> He had a black box schematic in <em>Steal This Book.</em>  I bought <em>Steal This Book.</em>  I had his black box schematic!  Same year!  But <em>Ramparts</em> magazine &mdash; which was like the <em>Mother Jones</em> of its day &mdash; came out with a nice clear, easier-to-follow one that year as well and they kind of got put out of business for a while. I made copies of that and spread 'em around to everyone. So I was helping everyone else do this even when I wasn't selling it. And that was probably wrong. I just sort of wanted to show off that I knew things that most people didn't know. That was my real motivation.
<br /><br />
<strong>JAMAIS CASCIO:</strong>  So what do you think are the rules for being an ethical prankster?
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> Ethical prankster? It's tough. I don't think there's 100% ethical. In theory, you have agreements with society not to do things that are going to be disruptive &mdash; to not do things that are gonna be different. And yet, practically, all of us have to do things that are a little bit different. And there's always some weird little laws that are written to catch you just for being different.
<br /><br />
Ethical hacking today is largely finding flaws in major computer systems, or possibly the phone systems. And to be ethical, you don't use it to harm anyone. And generally, that means you don't want to keep it secret forever. You want to boast that you're the one who found it. There's a young kid, I forget his name right now – and he would find these flaws and then tell the companies:  "Here's the flaw. You have two weeks to fix it, and then I'll make it public." And he wound up in jail. I met him, and he was just so pure that he was going to keep searching no matter what they did to him. He was going to keep on this track of finding the flaws and notifying the people what the flaws were and giving them a certain time to fix it before he made it public.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> You didn't mind tweaking the Pope! How far might that have gone?
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> Yeah. I said we were at the summit in Moscow. Someone said, "Here's the Bishop, who's going to be the translator."  And I said, "Yes, I'm calling from a
United States number. But you can call me back." He said, "I just spoke to Henry
Kissinger." I said, "I <em>am</em> Henry Kissinger. You can phone me back
now."  And I gave them a United States number to call. And I figured they would
think, "Oh, we've got his number!" I figured they knew it was a hacker. But I had given them a loop number, so they dial one number and I dial another and we get connected. There are really no records.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Right. A great phone phreak trick.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> Calling the Pope was just a weird idea that was kind of fun.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Did you have a plan, if you actually wound up talking to the pope? Did you have a narrative for the exchange?
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> No. I should've!
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Did you grow up watching "Candid Camera"?
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> Yeah!  I did. Guess what?  My son was pranked on by "Candid Camera." He got into an elevator in a hotel and headed down to his car early in the morning. And when the elevator door opens to let him out, instead of finding himself in the garage with cars, he's in a room. And he looks back and the elevator had no button. He played with it for a while, and somebody popped out and said, "You're on Candid Camera." But they didn't put him in the show. He probably wasn't animated enough for them.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> He was probably not too easy to surprise, after growing up with you. I hope you go ahead and write this book about pranks.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> I have forty years of pranks. That's going to be the third book. I'm thinking that for my second book, I'm going to publish my "manuscript." You've heard about Einstein's manuscript &mdash; it sounds really impressive. Well, I'm the only one who ever wrote this much code &mdash; I made the Apple II by hand. I couldn't afford what's called a rental system, where you can type it into a computer, and you type in your program, and it will give you back the 1's and 0's. So I figured out the 1's and 0's in my own head, and wrote them down on the piece of paper. Everything for the Apple II was done by hand. 
<br /><br />

<strong>Apple II was Coded by Hand</strong>
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> So you'd publish the code in book format?
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> I plan to publish the code and the schematics with some explanations of what I was thinking. It would be one of those things that you don't sell very many of.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>JC:</STRONG>  With a visual machine language editor, you could basically drag and drop 1's and 0's into a window.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> (Thinks) Visual machine... oh!  Now, that's a good idea. That's a clever idea. Yeah! That would be the modern version of what I did. 
<br /><br />
The best things I did were because I didn't have money. I couldn't afford the computer system to type my programs into. They were written in machine language &mdash; real geeky computer stuff for the microprocessor I used, and I couldn't afford it. But because of that, I got very intimate with the programs that I wrote by hand. Every step of the way, it was easy for me to be a very careful and thorough checker. And I would dream the programs! I would wake up with ideas about how to save one little step by doing something different, or I'd think of something I could get for free. Always believe in that &mdash; getting things for free. The next house I'm going to build is going to be built with that in mind. 
<br /><br />

<strong>Building an Energy Efficient House</strong>
<br /><br />

I was out judging a History Channel invention contest. And David Pogue, who is the technology writer for the <em>New York Times</em>, and the guy who owns the National Inventors Hall of Fame, were also judges. And we all decided we wanted to build this project that was the winner. The designer is a Civics Engineering Professor at Brigham Young &mdash; a very credible guy. And basically, he uses Southern Yellow Pine, the most energy-efficient wood that there is. It has a resin inside. And the resins &mdash; wood with resins – melts and freezes at 71 degrees. So if there's any impetus in the house for the temperature to get hotter than 71 degrees, it melts a little of the resin, which actually absorbs the heat and cools the house. It serves as your air conditioner. At nighttime, if it starts to freeze, it emits heat, and warms the house up to 71 degrees. And the houses can be built with another structure. They actually take dirt out of the ground... where they're going to build the house. They take the dirt out, they put it in machines, compress it into these tight bricks and then they heat it for about a week. Then they leave it out in the sun for about a week and they have these grooved parts that they slide together. And it's the cheapest, lowest energy, most green way to build a house that's going to last 500 years.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Jamais, that sounds like something you might have heard about at WorldChanging.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>JC:</STRONG> Yeah. BASF makes a thermal wax wallboard that does exactly what you described. They found that they could make houses in Germany 90% energy efficient. 
<br /><br />

<strong>On DRM, Open Source, &#038; the iPhone</strong>
<br /><br />

<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Before I let you go, I should ask a few contemporary geek questions &mdash; to satisfy those in the audience who are going to say, "You had Steve Wozniak on, and all you talked about was pranks!" That was pretty much my intention, but I should ask a few. What do you think about Steve Jobs' decision to embrace DRM-free music in iTunes?
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> I think it's a step towards the future. I mean, it doesn't make much sense if these things are going to have DRM forever. There's this whole problem that you can't trust everyone, but you can do a good enough job.
<br /><br />
Look at newspapers. Nothing stops me from buying a newspaper and passing it around to 20 other people. But, you know, you just kind of get used to what's easy to do. Only six of my purchased music songs so far, though, are from (DRM-free) EMI. 
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> The whole idea of Open Source has been a long running dialogue in computer culture. Richard Stallman and the Free Software Foundation see it as a
crusade. Is it necessary? Or can you have Open Source and proprietary stuff going on at the same time?
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> A lot of people think that Open Source means "free." It was never intended to mean free and it shouldn't mean free. People should be able to develop software and market it and have control over what they build. But when you sell a product that has a lot of software in it, being Open Source means you publish your source. And if somebody else wants to take your product and make a specialized version of it that does their few special things for their application; or does something a little different; or leaves pieces of it out; they can do that and they don't owe you a license fee. It just means they were able to improve either your mistakes, or the things that you left out that they want.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Sure. But do you consider that a moral necessity, or...
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> I consider it a moral right-ness. I don't know how to speak for everybody in society about necessities. But I think it's very honorable and it's very good for the customers.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Speaking of Open Source issues, have you ever hung out with Bill Gates?
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> I haven't. I've only spoken with him briefly a couple of times. I admire him, he admires me. Good lord, I'd never written a computer language when he had written a BASIC in the early days of hobby computers. And I thought, "Oh my gosh &mdash; a computer with BASIC finally makes a computer that people can use for things."  And so I said, I've got to write a BASIC. My goal was to be the first in the world to have a BASIC for the 6502. And I did it, but it was horrible because, in doing it, I left out one thing that could save a month &mdash; floating point...
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> That's in your book, actually.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG>  And before we wrote our floating point BASIC, Bill Gates popped in the door and he'd done Microsoft. And my attitude was, "Oh, good, it'll save us the time." Of course, when our five-year license on it ran out, the Apple II was pouring gadzooks of money into his company. So they had us under the barrel.

I like being the first at things. I had written my first syntax chart with floating point. In the Apple II ROMs, I even stuck in my own floating point routine. It wasn't incorporated into the BASIC, but I just didn't want the world thinking I couldn't write floating point routines.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>JC:</STRONG> Jobs actually related that story when he appeared onstage with Bill Gates.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> And Jobs got it pretty right. He said it was because I hand-wrote everything. And handwriting it, I couldn't just type an extra part into a program. I had to move addresses around. All my addresses were fixed by hand. And I couldn't expand my syntax table easily to add the floating point back in before we shipped the Apple II. Otherwise I would've.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Do you have a current technology project, outside of building your home?
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> Yes I do! I have a bunch. My favorite idea right now… they're  making flexible display materials now and showing them off. I would love to build a globe that's all a display. Maybe it would use Google Earth. And you could be zooming in on portions of this globe -- you can just look for Africa, for instance. And as you zoom in, the little dots are lit up like those programs that show you where all the volcanoes and all the webcams of the world are.  You'd zoom in on blue dots, and zoom and zoom and zoom, and on a blue dot, you'll see a <a href="http://www.webcam.com">webcam</a> right there in Africa; or right there in Amsterdam, or near the hotel you're gonna stay at in Greece. I would love that.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> People would want that. 
<br /><br />
<STRONG>JC:</STRONG> Yeah. And if you do it with Google Earth, you have all those KML layers so you can throw into it webcams and weather and traffic flows. There's all sorts of things you can do with that.
<br /><br />
<STRONG>RU:</STRONG> Last question. What do you think of the iPhone and do you think it will be a success?
<br /><br />
<STRONG>SW:</STRONG> I don't know. It will be a big hit off the bat, but after people have the iPhone it will truly be judged and compared. Will word of mouth kill it or make it a hit? Who knows? I can't even give my emotional feelings until I have a production unit for a while.
<br /><br />

<div style="float:right; padding-left:10px; padding-top:4px;">
<script type="text/javascript">digg_url = \'http://digg.com/tech_news/Woz_on_Open_Source_DRM_and_the_iPhone/';</script>
<script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script>reddit_url='http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/07/03/steve-wozniak-v-stephen-colbert-and-other-pranks/'</script>
<script>reddit_title='[TITLE]'</script>
<script language="javascript" src="http://reddit.com/button.js?t=2"></script>
</div>

<strong>See also:</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2006/12/07/apple-wozniak-biographer-interview-smith/">Wonderful Wizardry of Woz</a><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/28/hype-smackdown-iphone-v-paris-hilton/">Hype Smackdown: iPhone v. Paris Hilton</a><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/01/11/iphone-debate-im-a-mac-vs-bill-gates/">iPhone Debate: I'm a Mac v. Bill Gates</a><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/02/12/apple-computer-mac-sex-videos/">5 Sexiest Apple Videos</a><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/02/14/ipod-levy-the-perfect-thing-interview/">How the iPod Changes Culture</a><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2006/11/19/counterculture-and-the-tech-revolution/">Counterculture and the Tech Revolution</a><br /><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/07/03/steve-wozniak-v-stephen-colbert-and-other-pranks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube, the 20-Year-Old, and Date Unknown</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/22/youtube-the-20-year-old-and-date-unknown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/22/youtube-the-20-year-old-and-date-unknown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Destiny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/22/youtube-the-20-year-old-and-date-unknown/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The stage is set for a flood of copycat bum-rushers who will no doubt lay siege to the Googleplex armed with nothing but their media and Gen-Y audacity. <strong>By&#160;Destiny</strong><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://mondoglobo.net/images/brandon.jpg">
<br /><br />
<B>YouTube will share ad revenue</b> with <a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/04/16/should-youtube-hear-me/">20-year-old Brandon Fletcher</a>. Thus the stage is set for a flood of copycat bum-rushers who will no doubt lay siege to the YouTube/Googleplex armed with nothing but their media and their Gen-Y audacity.
<br /><br />
It's just 46 days after Brandon's YouTube show launched, and he sent me an email this morning.  It had a link to the breaking story, and a single emoticon.
<br /><br />
<blockquote>
	;-)
</blockquote>
<br /><br />
"The deal is basically sharing ad money," Brandon tells me.  "They place banners on my video pages and we split the revenue." (Though he adds that he "can't give specifics on the splits.") 
<br /><br />
"YouTube is going to place ads on the video pages of everyone in the program," he adds.  "I didn't even ask about joining, they offered it to me!"
<br /><br />                                                                  
I feel like a chump now.  Nine weeks ago I'd been skeptical when Brandon flew from New York City to Silicon Valley just to pitch YouTube his video show.  He'd vowed he'd stay in YouTube's lobby until they agreed to put his video on their front page.  "How did it go?" I'd asked cynically in April.  
<br /><br />
"Went really well," he wrote back cheerily, saying that an employee "took me out to eat, gave me some YouTube shirts and told me to come back!"  But when he went back to camp in YouTube's lobby, a security guard stopped him at the elevator. Eventually, Brandon flew back to New York City.  But he'd made some crucial contacts...
<br /><br />
So what was his big idea?  I did some sleuthing, and discovered it would be a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=dateunknown">web reality show</a>.   (Couples who met online would have their first real-life date -- and Brandon would film it.)  But a few weeks later, my skepticism started to melt, and I fired off an email to our editor. 
 <br /><br />  
<!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
<br /><br />
<blockquote>
<I>So that guy who didn't get past YouTube's security released his online dating show anyways.  And I have to say -- I think it's really good.</blockquote>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="350" align="center"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7tp_jevcSsM"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7tp_jevcSsM" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<blockquote>They're both from MySpace -- nice twist! -- and there's genuine, real-life odd moments.  (When the guy suggests that when they play pool, it should be "strip pool," his date thinks for a second.  Then says, "I'm glad I wore a lot of layers...  I think YOU should just strip.")
<br /><br />
He just now sent out the press release...
</i></blockquote>
<br /><br />
And it <em>was</em> a good press release.  "Behind the production, a story of determination and perseverance," announced one section's title.  It said Brandon "funded the project on his own, and then filmed, edited, and scored and produced music for every episode..." It even referenced his "gutsy mission" to get YouTube to feature it. 
<br /><br />
But he hadn't achieved any results yet.  The only happy ending I'd found was that Brandon hadn't given up. On his blog he'd written "I will not stop trying until I reach my goal."After the May launch of his secret video project, Brandon had seemed excited. "I feel great right now!" he told me.  "I'm just going to keep on working hard, and trying to spread the word about this site as much as I can." 
<br /><br />
But he added: "I feel like I've created something great here, though."
<br /><br />
He told me he hoped a TV network might show interest in the show, "but for now, as long as I'm enjoying this -- I will continue to handle it on my own."  And the show continued -- mostly fueled by his raw enthusiasm.  
<br /><br />
Brandon planned to release a new episode every Monday, with extra videos throughout the week showing outtakes or on-the-street interviews about online dating.  But within a week there was good news. "[S]omeone from YouTube placed the first episode on the 'Featured Directors' column, which appears on the right side of the website when you browse videos. It gets around 1 million impressions per day, so we're at about 10,000 views for episode one in less than a week!"
<br /><br />
And I had to admit it was entertaining.
<blockquote>

"Does it take you a lot to get wasted?" asks the guy in the red t-shirt that says "IDIOT!"
<br /><br />
"No," his date answers.  "I'm a light weight...."
</blockquote>
<br /><br />
That first episode was eventually viewed over 20,000 times.  The YouTube channel seemed erratic -- episode 2 drew just 6,741 views, and episode 3 just 3,885.  But Brandon told me there were more views on the web site, and "a few investors have been contacting me about the project."  Three weeks ago he sent me an update -- that he was "Working on a sponsorship / cross-promotion."  Eight days ago he told me that the last episode jumped to 25,000 views in one week.  Maybe that was because its title was "Pee on me," I thought -- since the next episode racked up only 1,053 views in its first three days on YouTube.
<br /><br />
But then today, the big news came.
<br /><br />
YouTube had heard him, and YouTube had signed him.  
<br /><br />
And Brandon's email was both the last word, and maybe also a call to his peers...
<br /><br />
<blockquote>
	;-)
</blockquote>
<br /><br />
<B>See also:</b><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/19/youtubes-5-sorriest-questions-for-the-2008-presidential-candidates/">YouTube’s 5 Sorriest Questions for the 2008 Presidential Candidates</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/02/12/apple-computer-mac-sex-videos/">The 5 Sexiest Apple Videos</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/04/16/should-youtube-hear-me/">Should YouTube Hear Me?</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/11/the-cartoon-porn-shop-janitor-carol-burnett-vs-family-guy/">The Cartoon Porn Shop Janitor: Carol Burnett vs. Family Guy</A><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/22/youtube-the-20-year-old-and-date-unknown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 5 Cartoon Hunks</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/19/top-5-cartoon-hunks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/19/top-5-cartoon-hunks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacki Lewin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pop Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/19/top-5-cartoon-hunks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Animation has provided us with countless lady hotties, but cute cartoon guys are harder to come by. <strong>By&#160;Jacki&#160;Lewin</strong>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<strong>Animation has provided</strong> us with countless lady hotties, but cute cartoon guys are harder to come by. (Maybe it's because this is traditionally a domain of prepubescent boys and older male nerds.) However, I've had my share of cartoon crushes, and here are the best of them...
<br /><br /><!--adsense-->
<br /><br />


<strong>5. Silver Surfer </strong>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lue1O22S11c"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lue1O22S11c" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
OK, this one is going to seem trendy because of the movie, but I had a Silver Surfer action figure way back in college. His appeal is unquestionable: a big silver hunk of man on a surfboard, a perfect combination of intensity and laid-back surfer chic, kind of like Owen Wilson. 
<br /><br />
This guy will save your life, then take you for a fish taco on the boardwalk.
<br /><br />
<strong>4. James Barris</strong>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Q2FXFPEEN2Y"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Q2FXFPEEN2Y" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
Confession: I have an enormous crush on Robert Downey Jr. So when he showed up in <a href="http://www.rusiriusradio.com/2006/07/03/show-51-the-one-year-mark-with-richard-linklater/">A Scanner Darkly</a>, my crush naturally transferred to his new avatar. 
<br /><br /><!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
<br /><br />
Barris is classic RDJ. Although Downey is a brilliant actor, he never seems so comfortable in a role than when he is playing a druggie. His magic &mdash; and I choose to believe this also holds true in real life &mdash; is that he can make even the biggest fuck-up irresistibly charming. Even though I'm a longtime member of the Keanu fan club, RDJ stole the scene here, as he always does.
<br /><br />
<strong>3. Aladdin</strong>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nuZkVzvZFdM"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nuZkVzvZFdM" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
All you have to do is scroll down this <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Disney_princes">list of Disney princes</a>, and see that the role of Mr. Charming was historically lacking in hotness &mdash; a bunch of middle-aged looking WASPs who usually arrive in the last few minutes of the film to sing a song and sweep the damsel away on a horse. Well, that all changed with Aladdin. He's a homeless guy with a bangin' bod, a great personality, a hilarious buddy and a cool pet. 
<br /><br />
I love how his scrappy bravura cracks to show a vulnerable side once he assumes his alter-ego of Prince Ali. Let me tell you, chicks dig this type of thing. We were all there swooning with those ladies as he paraded through town on an elephant, knowing that his confidence was concealing a secret shyness.
<br /><br />
<strong>2. Rio Pacheco</strong>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DzvtuvIu8e0"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DzvtuvIu8e0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
Rio from <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0001LJCUM?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=B0001LJCUM">Jem and the Holograms</A> is one of those guys you like even though you know that he's kind of an asshole. He started out as a good guy, a volunteer at the foster home and Jerrica's boyfriend. But he developed a crush on Jem (Jerrica's rockstar alter-ego) and the show ended on a cliffhanger with Rio double-timing two girls who are the same person! This is undoubtedly one of the great unsolved endings in television &mdash; this whole Sopranos thing pales in comparison! 
<br /><br /><!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
<br /><br />
The truth is, Rio's bad side is what makes him sexy: the lying, the deceit, the secrecy. And yet he can be a real sweetie when he wants to. I mean, if Jerrica really trusted him then wouldn't she tell him her identity? Perhaps with a guy like this you need to have your own secrets.
<br /><br />
<strong>1. Trent Lane</strong>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XXkWbE_nRgo"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XXkWbE_nRgo" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
Absolutely the most crushable cartoon fella out there; even the ever-cynical Daria couldn't help but blush a little when Trent was around. Trent's rock star slacker attitude was peppered by a hint of zen calmness, his soft raspy voice delivering the type of inane truisms that only truly attractive people can get away with. 
<br /><br />
Finally, his slight slouch suggested a world weariness &mdash; a wiseness, dare I say? &mdash; that perfectly defines a classic childhood crush: your friend's older brother.
<br /><br />
<em>Jacki Lewin is an American living in Madrid, Spain. She blogs at <a href="http://7yearslate.blogspot.com">7 Years Late</a>.</em>

<P>
<B>See also:</b><br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/10/31/lost-horrors-ending-found-on-youtube/">Lost 'Horrors' Ending Found on YouTube</A><br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/02/20/5-freaky-muppet-videos/">5 Freaky Muppet Videos</A><br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/03/26/six-freakiest-childrens-tv-rock-bands/">Six Freakiest Children's TV Rock Bands</A><br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/11/the-cartoon-porn-shop-janitor-carol-burnett-vs-family-guy/">The Cartoon Porn Shop Janitor: Carol Burnett vs. Family Guy</A><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/19/top-5-cartoon-hunks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube&#8217;s 5 Sorriest Questions for the 2008 Presidential Candidates</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/19/youtubes-5-sorriest-questions-for-the-2008-presidential-candidates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/19/youtubes-5-sorriest-questions-for-the-2008-presidential-candidates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lou Cabron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics, Law & War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/19/youtubes-5-sorriest-questions-for-the-2008-presidential-candidates/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What if my President was selected by MySpace?  <B>By&#160;Lou&#160;Cabron</b><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:left; padding-right:10px; padding-top:4px;">
<script type="text/javascript">digg_url = \'http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/The_worst_of_the_CNN_YouTube_Presidential_debate_videos';</script>
<script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
</div>

<B>What if my President</B> was selected by MySpace?  It's the nagging concern raised when young video bloggers lob questions at the Presidential candidates.  In July when the Democrats gather in Charleston, they'll find CNN has swapped in questions that were uploaded as videos to YouTube.
<br /><br />
At least that was the hope when the CNN/YouTube "debate" was announced.  Unfortunately, no one <I>cared</i> about the announcement (except the commenter who added "omg the youtube guy is fucking HAWTT!!!"). Nearly a week later, YouTube has managed to assemble just over 120 questions to choose from.  And five of them are the dogs below.  
<br /><br />
Yes, for years we've dreamed of an interactive democracy &mdash; a giant techno-village wired into a real, two-way discourse. Why shouldn't our lawmakers get the same crowd-polling technology that's available to contestants on <I>1 vs. 100?</i> (Answer: because the wisdom of the crowd is matched only by the buffoonery of the individual.)  
<br /><br />
While it's morbidly amusing to imagine candidates groveling for LonelyGirl15's endorsement, YouTube is slyly attempting to <I>appear</i> democratic without actually accomplishing anything. But maybe that's YouTube's cynical comment on democracy itself.  Maybe they're imagining the event's slogan as:  "It's participatory!  It's YouTube!  And it's stupid!  Just like voting..."
<br /><br />
<B>1.  Headzup</b>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="350" align="center"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SfwKQpP7XM0"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SfwKQpP7XM0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
This question comes to us from "HeadzUp", who specializes in badly-animated cartoons of jabbering heads &mdash; in this case, George W. Bush.
<br /><br />
The cartoon President starts a familiar gotcha question &mdash; if a dirty nuclear bomb killed millions, and a second bomb risked millions more lives...  But never mind.  It's a joke.

<br /><br />  <!--adsense-->
<br /><br />

"you are totally a moron," replied an irate YouTube commenter, "and if youtube had a star rating for the DUMB FUCKS, you would most certainly qualify, hands down LMAO,FOAD."
<br /><br />
We've elevated the discourse already.  
<br /><br />
<B>2.  We are not alone</b>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="350" align="center"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/eIqww-pTYNw"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/eIqww-pTYNw" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
A user named "DickGhostmoon" wants to ask the candidates "a very, very serious question...about aliens." He's titled his video "alien autopsy CNN YOUTUBE Debate," and includes footage of a 2001 press conference seeking the declassification of secret government information about  extra-terrestrials.
<br /><br />
And there's also some footage of Santa Claus.
<br /><br /><!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
<br /><br />
Interestingly, the question comes from England, and YouTube also received questions from Spain, Canada, Australia, and Malaysia.  
<br /><br />
We're guessing these questioners aren't even voting. They're just mocking our hopelessly compromised electoral system while enjoying their universal health care.
<br /><br />
<B>3.  "88% of Californians..."</B>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="350" align="center"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RXvM8vakHR0"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RXvM8vakHR0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
Imagine the next President of the United States fielding questions from "The Wine Kone." His YouTube channel identifies him as a Canadian, and promises "video responses and who knows what else (probably lameness)." 
<br /><br />
His self-described "very important question" concerns Arnold Schwarzenegger, his re-election as governor of California, and...  No wait.  It's another joke, this one about cyborgs and the plot of <em>Terminator III</em>.
<br /><br />
"YouTube didn't put me up to this," adds a superfluous title at the end.  (Really? Because it's hard to believe that YouTube would allow something so edgy unless they had an ironical hand in it.) 
<br /><br />
Maybe one day, with enough help from biting Canadian jokes like this one, Americans will penetrate the haze of our Puritan, bi-polar system and, like Maplestan, finally see how ultra-silly it is to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Thomas_(Ontario_politician)">elect actors as politicians</a>.    
<br /><br />

<B>4.  "Hi, Hillary..."</b>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="350" align="center"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/b_cAwOesFV8"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/b_cAwOesFV8" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
OMG!  It's a cartoon animation of Hillary Clinton! Asking a question to Hillary Clinton! My head is about to explode!
<br /><br />
The question &mdash; read by a speech synthesizer &mdash; presents scenarios about access to health care. By the way, did I mention it's read by a Hillary Clinton avatar?  "Give us a nice answer," it asks, "so you look good &mdash; and I look good!"
<br /><br /><!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
<br /><br />
Video hides the face of the American asking, but maybe it reveals a deeper truth &mdash; that the real appeal of politics is the opportunity to preen and pose.  "Please advise me on your future vision for addressing our health care crisis," the video seems to say... 
<br /><br />
"And also, check out my cool new widget!"
<br /><br />
<B>5.  "So cool..."</b>
<br /><br />
<object width="425" height="350" align="center"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VOfmxypSc-Q"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VOfmxypSc-Q" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<br /><br />
16 people have rated this video.  It's average score?  One star. YouTube user Netram59 summed up the response. "You say YouTubers have a lot to say but it seems you don't."
<br /><br />
But the uploader &mdash; "GoodNeighbor" &mdash; is actually part of an L.A. based sketch comedy crew. "They all like to draw," reads their YouTube profile, "and make music and movies and stuff!!"  Hooray!
<br /><br />
Is it better or worse that "GoodNeighbor" skipped the chance to question our next President for a quick laugh?  I'm honestly not sure.  YouTube may have empowered a generation, but maybe it's a good thing that the giant internet corporation hasn't been able to channel them all into a specific, YouTube-directed activity.
<br /><br />
Maybe the revolution was never meant to be televised...

<div style="float:right; padding-left:10px; padding-top:4px;">
<script type="text/javascript">digg_url = \'http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/The_worst_of_the_CNN_YouTube_Presidential_debate_videos';</script>
<script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></div>
<br /><br />
<strong>See also:</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/22/youtube-the-20-year-old-and-date-unknown/">YouTube, the 20-year-old, and Date Unknown</A><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/04/16/should-youtube-hear-me/">Should YouTube Hear Me?</a><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/03/05/john-edwards-virtual-attackers-unmasked/">John Edwards' Virutal Attackers Unmasked</a><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2006/11/27/iraq-youtube-battle-footage/">Iraq Battle Footage</a><br />
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/02/12/apple-computer-mac-sex-videos/">The 5 Sexiest Apple Videos</A>
<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/19/youtubes-5-sorriest-questions-for-the-2008-presidential-candidates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Cartoon Porn Shop Janitor &#8212; Carol Burnett vs. Family Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/11/the-cartoon-porn-shop-janitor-carol-burnett-vs-family-guy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/11/the-cartoon-porn-shop-janitor-carol-burnett-vs-family-guy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Destiny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/11/the-cartoon-porn-shop-janitor-carol-burnett-vs-family-guy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What happens when you draw a 74-year-old comedienne into a prime time cartoon on the Fox Network -- as the janitor at an adult bookstore?  <B>By&#160;Destiny</b>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://mondoglobo.net/images/Carol%20Burnett%20vs%20Family%20Guy%20(Peterotica%20episode).jpg">
<br/><br />

<div style="float:left; padding-right:10px; padding-top:4px;">
<script>reddit_url=''</script>
<script>reddit_title='[TITLE]'</script>
<script language="javascript" src="http://reddit.com/button.js?t=2"></script>
</div>

<strong>A porn shop in a cartoon unexpectedly triggered a lawsuit.</strong><br/>
<br />
In the <I>Family Guy</i> episode "Peterotica," Peter and his friends go to the local adult bookstore. What happens next was apparently determined by the following sequence of events.<br/>
<br/>
1.  <I>Family Guy</I> asks Carol Burnett if they can use the theme to her 1970s variety show.<br/>
<br/>
2.  Carol Burnett says no.<br/>
<br/>
3.  They draw her into the cartoon as the adult bookstore's cleaning woman.<br/>
<br/>
And then comes #4 &mdash; Carol Burnett <a href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/0316072carolburnett1.html">sues them</A>.<br/>
<br/>
<div class="breakout">
<div class="breakhead">Related Links</div>
<div class="breakcontent">
&raquo; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000HT3P6U?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=neofilesradio-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=B000HT3P6U">Buy the DVD</a><br/>
&raquo; <a href="http://www.watchtvsitcoms.com/FamilyGuy/S04E24.php">Watch the Episode Online</A><br />
&raquo; <a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/01/09/screechs-sex-tape-follies/">Screech's Sex Tape</A><br/>
&raquo; <a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/08/04/craigslist-troll-gets-sued/">Craigslist Sex Troll Gets Sued</A>
</div>
</div>

The Fox Network has expressed surprise, since she appears in the cartoon for only four seconds, but Burnett's lawsuit reportedly claimed violations of copyright and trademark law, plus a misappropriation of her name and likeness.  This weekend a judge revealed what happens in step 5: Carol Burnett loses that lawsuit. According to news reports, a judge signed a ruling Friday that while the the <I>Family Guy</i> episode may offend her &mdash; the First Amendment allows parodies. (After all, her original variety show was famous for its own parodies.)<br/>

<br/><!--adsense-->
<br/><br/>
Carol Burnett is a pioneer in celebrity lawsuits.  In 1981 she surprised legal observers with a successful lawsuit against the <em>National Enquirer</em> over a report that implied she'd been drunk in a restaurant with Henry Kissinger.  (“In a Washington restaurant, a boisterous Carol Burnett had a loud argument... But Carol really raised eyebrows when she accidentally knocked a glass of wine over one diner and started giggling instead of apologizing...")  She may have been vindicated over that slight to her public image, but as a public figure she's also fair game for ridicule.  And thanks to <I>Family Guy</i>, an animated likeness of the 74-year-old comedienne can be glimpsed in some very unsavory company.<br/>
<br/>
Like most <I>Family Guy</i> episodes, this one was a series of loosely-connected jokes, but this time they were tied together by the theme of adult books. Peter's disappointment at the adult bookstore's offerings drives him to write his own porn novels.  (Including <I>Angela's Asses</i>, <I>Shaved New World</i>, and <I>Harry Potter and the Half Black Chick</i>.)  <br/>
<br/>
Ironically, in this episode of the cartoon, it's the Family Guy himself who is eventually sued &mdash; though for different reasons.  Peter's own erotic novels are so steamy that they prompt one driver to remove his shirt while driving.  (He'd been listening to the book on tape version of Peter's adult book, <I>The Hot Chick Who Was Italian.  Or Maybe Some Kind of Spanish.</i>)  This scene may include another dig at Carol Burnett, since the tape version of that book is being read by a regular guest on the Carol Burnett Show &mdash; Betty White.<br/>
<br/><!--adsense#IndieClick_468-->
<br/><br/>
Peter's career ends after the disgruntled motorist's lawsuit &mdash; and he also gets a surprise visit from...  Betty White.<br/>
<br/>
Perhaps foreshadowing the legal showdowns to come, she tells him, "I just got a  subpoena for an erotic novel, and I'm looking for the son of a bitch responsible."<br/>
<br/>
<center><a href="http://www.watchtvsitcoms.com/FamilyGuy/S04E24.php"><I>Click here to watch the whole episode online</i></A></center><br/>
<br/>
<div style="float:right; padding-left:10px; padding-top:4px;">

<script>reddit_url=''</script>
<script>reddit_title='[TITLE]'</script>
<script language="javascript" src="http://reddit.com/button.js?t=2"></script>
</div>
<strong>See also:</strong><br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/19/top-5-cartoon-hunks">Top 5 Cartoon Hunks</a><br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/01/09/screechs-sex-tape-follies/">Screech's Sex Tape Follies</a><br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/05/30/the-celebrity-breast-conspiracy/">The Celebrity Breast Conspiracy</a><br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/01/01/mariah-carey-mary-carey-porn/">The Porn Star, the Diva, and the World Wide Web</a><br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/02/12/apple-computer-mac-sex-videos/">5 Sexiest Apple Videos</a><br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/05/20/dustin-diamond-celebrity-fit-club/">Dustin Diamond vs. Sgt. Harvey</a><br/>
<a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2006/11/20/5-lamest-charlie-brown-cartoons/">5 Lamest Charlie Brown Cartoons</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/06/11/the-cartoon-porn-shop-janitor-carol-burnett-vs-family-guy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
