There Won’t Be Blood

There Won't Be Blood

When Lisa Bloch opened the drawer at San Francisco General Hospital that should have housed the trauma center’s blood supply last month, a lonely single pouch of type O-negative plasma tumbled in the empty space.

Bloch, director of communications at Blood Centers of the Pacific, was seeking to draw attention to the city’s dire shortage of blood by depicting it in graphic terms. The shortage got so bad early in the month that BCoP asked local hospitals to hold off on lesser-priority surgeries.

All across the country, large cities are struggling to keep supplies at sufficient levels. The reasons are a classically tragic conflict of supply (only about five percent of adults donate blood) and demand (day-to-day trauma center crises, national emergencies, the Iraq war).

Unfortunately, agencies that collect blood are fighting the battle to keep local and national blood supplies adequate with at least one hand tied behind their backs, because a sizable percentage of the population is barred from donating blood – gay men.

If you’re a man who has had sex with another man even once since 1977, you are not allowed to donate blood. The ban was instituted during the height of the '80s AIDS outbreak, before proper testing existed that could screen out infected blood.

But despite the leaps and bounds that have been accomplished in testing blood for HIV/AIDS, the Bush administration still doesn’t think the blood of gay males is good enough.

In San Francisco, given its higher-than-average gay male population, this keeps many who would like to donate from being able to help out in what has become a day-to-day crisis situation, let alone in the event of a local or national emergency.

But San Francisco proper has just more than 1 million people. Larger cities with a large gay male presence like Los Angeles and New York City (both of which have suffered from blood shortages recently) are also affected by the inability to tap into its gay males as a blood resource.

“We have gay men come in and are surprised the ban is still in effect,” said Bloch. “They’re ready to give blood, and it’s very frustrating that we can’t use it.”

BCoP was the very first organization imploring the government to soften its stance. In 2006, the Red Cross finally joined in the effort to get the Food and Drug Administration to implement the male-to-male (MSM) deferral.

“Today, we know much more about HIV,” the center wrote to the FDA. “The development of highly sensitive genetic tests for the virus has greatly reduced the “window” of transmission. Therefore, Blood Centers of the Pacific – along with the three national blood banking organizations: America’s Blood Centers, American Association of Blood Banks and the American Red Cross – believes that a 12-month deferral would adequately prevent transfusion-transmission of HIV.”

A 12-month deferral is consistent with other high-risk activities that may exclude someone from donating blood, including sexual contact with a prostitute, getting a tattoo (for hepatitis C) and traveling to a region endemic for malaria.

But the FDA not only refused, it didn’t even dignify the request with a response.

State Assemblyman Mark Leno, an openly gay male, is convinced the Bush administration is letting its obvious agenda against gays influence public policy on an issue that not only involves public health, but national security.

“There is indeed homophobia at work, and it’s not even very subtle,” said Leno. “None of this (the FDA’s inflexibility) is scientific.”

Like many, Leno was unaware of the policy until he tried to donate blood when he was on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.

“When I was on the board I got an invitation to participate in a blood drive, and was surprised to learn that as a gay man I wasn’t allowed to participate,” he said.

Leno likened the FDA policy to that of the Catholic church, which officially is “okay” with homosexuals, as long as they don’t actually do anything gay.

Ironically, heterosexuals who engage in high-risk sexual behavior are allowed to donate blood. Some feel the whole process needs to be revised to screen out high risk groups accordingly.

“They’re asking the wrong questions,” said Leno. “Ask what behaviors individuals are engaging in, not with whom.”

The issue is expected to go before the FDA again next month, though there doesn’t appear to be much hope that the current administration will implement the MSM deferral that blood centers are counting on.

Leno chuckled bitterly at the prospects, choosing instead to look forward. “With a Democratic administration, which I believe we’ll have next year, I’ll be working with House Speaker (Nancy) Pelosi to not only reverse this dangerous policy, but to address the shortage and the screening process.”

“I don’t know how much longer they can keep stalling,” said Bloch, who agreed that a change of administration might be necessary before the FDA takes any action.

With gay men in San Francisco making up somewhere between five and 10 percent of the city’s population, a change in policy could produce noticeable results.

“I think it could make an impact on local blood shortages,” said Bloch. “Any help is a good thing, especially in times like this.”

8 thoughts to “There Won’t Be Blood”

  1. Perhaps a “go slow” approach will defuse the politics. Start with a 2-year deferral, with 2 required HIV tests: 1 no less than 12 months after the last high-risk activity, and another no less than 12 months after the first. True, there is little scientific evidence to show a 12-month deferral with 1 test is any less accurate but we are talking fear and politics here.
    If Obama or Clinton win in November it will all be moot anyways, policy will finally catch up with science.
    How many people have died for lack of blood since the current policy came into being?

  2. Last fall, my company supported a blood drive. I was actually excited to participate; I had been excluded years ago because medication I was taking persisted in the blood stream for too long.

    I’d nearly completed the screening interview when the tech asked if I’d ever engaged in sexual contact with another male. I said I had and explained it had been over 12 years ago. He apologized profusely and said the ban spoken of in this article kept any male EVER having sexual contact with another male from donating blood.

    I’m thinking we can thank the still-taboo status of youthful homosexual experimentation for a portion of the existing supply; god knows if all folks were as honest to the techs as I’d been we’d have still less blood available. As I truly want to give blood, I’ve even considered lying.

    Abso-fricking-lutely absurd. Do they let black folks give? Cause, ya know, they have pig blood… Gimmie a damn break!

  3. i have an uncommon blood type with some rare proteins that make it very desirable for platlet donation. for several years i had donated blood and platlets on a regular basis. then, suddenly, because i had lived in england for more than 3 months — over 12 years ago — my blood was not “useable.” i have never been ill, or on medication, engaged in “questionable” behavior, or even had a tattoo but because of studying in england, my once desireable blood was no longer wanted. i know of not one single person who was at school with me at that time who came down with CJZ or any other blood-born disease.

    a few weeks after that rejection, i got a letter from the NY Blood Center saying that, even though i might never be able to donate blood again, they would like me to engage in an AIDS vaccine trial. because of family considerations, i had to refuse. and it turns out the trial was not only *not* successful, it is believed that at least 4 volunteers became infected with HIV.

    i know that blood donation questionnaire answers are based on the “honor” system, but i’m beginning to think it’s time for clean-living gays, and others whose only risky behavior has been travel, to start lying on those questionnaires. they need blood, and i’m willing. it is foolishness to keep the supply limited to such a narrow portion of the population.

  4. Hepatitis can also lead to liver cirrhosis if it has not been taken care of.:`”

  5. hepatitis can be prevented by avoiding sharing of needles and proper sterilization of cutting tools*’~

  6. there are variants of Hepatitis which are very difficult to cure, take for example Hep-B and Hep-C'”*

  7. you can get hepatitis-A from contaminated food and Hepatitis-B from contaminated blood`:`

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *