“Dear Internet, I’m Sorry”

March 14th, 2007

Crook on Fox News

Even while delivering a video apology "to all bloggers, webmasters and other individuals" as part of a settlement agreement with 10 Zen Monkeys, he somehow seems determined to be the most hated man on the internet — if he could just get people to stop ignoring him. (You'll find that video further down on the page.)

But, let's back up a bit first...
I'm writing a new story for 10zen tonight.

Dana Plato?

Nah, the piece is about that Michael Crook guy.

That's how it started last September. We'd already written about a Seattle prankster named Jason Fortuny, who'd pretended to be a woman on Craig's List and then published horny male respondents' private info on the internet. In the fateful 27th comment on that story, a new site popped onto our radar.
He's inspired a website that exposes people nationwide — craigslist-perverts.org

That web site was registered to Michael Crook, and to this day I'm convinced Crook himself left the comment, hoping to skim off some of the attention. Sure enough, the site showed that Crook had duplicated Fortuny's stunt; he'd posted a fake ad on Craig's List pretending to be a young woman seeking sex in Syracuse, New York. But no one even noticed; according to Crook's own blog, he only got a few dozen responses. He tried posting more fake ads in more cities — Las Vegas, Dayton, South Jersey, Kansas City, and Anchorage — and created a web site with the results.

We noticed, but we weren't impressed. The original title for our article about Crook was "wannabe asshole," although we later changed it to In the Company of Jerkoffs, calling Crook "another sad member of the 'griefer community'... not only pathetic, but a pathetic copycat."
As an after-thought, I'd sent Jeff Diehl, our editor, a screenshot from Crook's appearance on Fox News to accompany the story. ("I think the bad hair and stiff tie and collar say a lot about the guy...")

We knew Crook wouldn't like it — but that's life on the internet. (I'm sure the men who answered his fake Craig's List ad didn't like it when he called them at work, either.) Life continued at our up and coming webzine — our next story questioned the press coverage about Willie Nelson's September arrest for possession of mushrooms. And then something weird happened...

Our internet service provider got a nasty email from Michael Crook. Crook wanted the embarrassing picture taken down, and to make that happen, he was pretending he had a copyright over the screenshot from Fox News, citing the "Digital Millenium Copyright Act" (or DMCA). I suggested a new headline for Jeff. "Syracuse jerk uses heavy-handed DMCA mumbo-jumbo to try to intimidate web pages he doesn't like."

We were clear that Crook had no legal claim. But his amateurish legalese spooked our spineless (pre-Laughing Squid) ISP, who asked Jeff to remove the image anyways. Jeff knew there was something wrong. In the world we live in, internet services can absolve themselves from future legal liability — if they quickly remove the suspect material. This means if someone wants an embarrassing picture taken down, simply masquerading as its copyright holder can be enough. So Michael Crook was pretending he owned a copyright on someone else's picture of his face.

Crook's legal interpretation was as laughable as the Batman comic book where the Joker claimed a copyright on a fish that looked like him.

But deep within the DMCA law is a counter-provision — 512(f), which states that misrepresenting yourself as a copyright owner has consequences. Any damage caused by harmful misrepresentation must be reimbursed. In 2004 the Electronic Frontier Foundation won a six-figure award from Diebold Election Systems, who had claimed a "copyright" on embarrassing internal memos which were published online. So not only was Jeff Diehl legally free to publish Crook's picture; Crook was in violation of the law for pretending he owned a copyright.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation now agreed to represent us. Crook hadn't just issued a copyright notice to 10 Zen Monkeys; he'd sent them to other web sites, again pretending to own the copyright on Fox News' image, to trick the sites into taking his picture down. (There were even cases where he served DMCA notices to websites that published Fair Use quotes from his blog.) Crook was a serial abuser of the copyright law — and so far his misuse of it had been rewarded every time. Some webmasters and bloggers obeyed the takedown notices without considering the counter-claim process, to avoid having to give Crook their identifying information — which he'd publicly demonstrated he enjoyed using maliciously.

But it was a mistake to try his stunt anywhere near Silicon Valley, where people closely follow how technology is evolving, and care deeply about protecting free speech online. Local web stars cheered on the lawsuit at sites like BoingBoing and Valleywag (where Nick Douglas wrote, "This Emo Kid is Getting Sued," and later begged Crook for a DMCA takedown notice of his own — which he got and displayed proudly). Someone had finally noticed Michael Crook — but for all the wrong reasons. Web sites were now re-posting even more copies of the picture he hated.

Crook tried hiding from the delivery of the legal documents — then later blustered on his web site that he'd successfully re-structured his business holdings to make it hard to collect. In a futile go-for-broke strategy, he then sent even more bogus DMCA notices — to other web sites which were reporting on his original bogus copyright notice. "I wonder if this is another one of his stunts for 'bad attention,'" I asked Jeff. "Everyone online hates the DMCA; maybe he's deliberately abusing it, the way Andy Kaufman used to bait professional wrestling fans."

For a brief moment it was Michael Crook versus the internet — until Michael Crook lost in a blow-out. Ignoring Crook's amateurish legal posturing, Fark.com users created over 50 versions of the supposedly-forbidden photo, photoshopping Crook's face into even more embarrassing poses. Someone tracked down Crook's high school yearbook photos (which, ironically, ended up being mocked in the blog of the original Craigs List prankster, Jason Fortuny.) Someone even uploaded the photo into the virtual gaming world Second Life. (Crook then tried unsuccessfully to issue a DMCA notice against a photo of that photo.) The ongoing mockery became a kind of online seminar, reminding web surfers to stand up to copyright law abusers, and to never pay attention to the Michael Crooks of the world.

In November, web writer Tucker Max called out Crook for an online debate. Crook accepted — though he only made three short posts, apparently caught off guard when Max refused to take Crook's weird positions seriously and instead attacked Crook himself. "You are desperate for attention," Max wrote, "and the ability to feel something, anything, you are willing to be the most ridiculed, hated person on the internet. Look at yourself dude. Look at your life." Max even claims he used his contacts as a law school graduate to guarantee that Crook, who says he wants to one day be a lawyer, will never pass the bar.

But abusing copyright law was only Crook's latest attempt at provoking attention. He'd previously claimed to hate the military, Jews, gays, immigrants, non-whites and children. Max noted that Crook tried to join the army, and had been rejected; and that Child Protective Services had taken his children away. Were Crook's attacks just a misguided lashing out over his own bitter failures?

The online world was faced with the griefer paradox: that griefers want bad attention, and the only real answer is ignoring them. Behind the scenes, the EFF was working to establish the only true point of the case — that web sites didn't have to buckle in the face of bogus copyright threats, and that abusing the DMCA would bring consequences.

Because Crook proved himself to be legally indigent, and was representing himself in an incompetent way that would likely have lessened the impact of an official judgment, it was decided that a settlement agreement could accomplish just as much, possibly more. Crook eventually signed such an agreement. It requires him to 1) take a course on copyright law basics; 2) never again file any cease and desist notices concerning the image of him on Fox News; 3) withdraw each and every DMCA notice he served regarding the image; 4) refrain from filing any DMCA notices for 5 years unless the material in question is personally authored, photographed or originated by him; 5) include in any DMCA notice during that 5 year period, URLs pointing to the EFF's web page summarizing this case; 6) turn over ownership of any domain names to Jeff Diehl and 10 Zen Monkeys if he is caught violating any of the terms of the agreement.

And, finally, he had to formally apologize to those he harassed. In video. Here now, is that video:

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License.

Subscribe now to MondoGlobo's new video show, 10ZM.TV!

In the San Francisco Bay Area? Celebrate free speech and the EFF: Free Speech Ain't Free!

See also:
EFF's Jason Schultz Explains the Crook Case
EFF's Diehl v. Crook page
Settlement Agreement
In the Company of Jerkoffs
The Case Against Crook
Crooks of the World Hurt Copyright, Free Speech
Craigslist Sex Troll Gets Sued
Subscribe to this site with:
Add to:
Digg | | Reddit

Send to a Friend:

E-mail this story
to a friend




77 Responses to ““Dear Internet, I’m Sorry””

  1. Colt Says:

    This is also the same guy, that on our radio show, claimed that he A) Raped an underage woman and B) impregnated her, which he had a little girl, who he does not see, nor care about. He further went on to exclaim what he did was not wrong, and he would never be caught, and since of course this was done on a live radio show, we have it recorded, and available to anyone who wants it. http://www.nhbradio.com and just ask us, we’d be happy to give it to anyone, just to further prove how much of a tool this guy is.

  2. eo Says:

    “Who knew you can’t control your own image?”
    Everyone but Crook, I guess. I think the settlement he received was much less harsh than the punishment he deserved, and he seems less than sincere in the video, but such is life.

  3. Melanie Says:

    What an asshole. I’m so glad that he agreed to this settlement. This has been an interesting case to follow. Some day, with luck, Crook will get hit by a Mack truck.

  4. #1 crook fan Says:

    yeah, I like how he still tries to play tough on his site- like he won or something. Even his video: “ooh, I didn’t know”. Deihl got everything he wanted from this case- just another video for the internet community to see that this guy loses. every. time.

  5. #1 crook fan Says:

    Assuming the statute of limitations has run out for the rape, he might never get legally caught. But having the whole world know that you’re a rapist? That’s good enough for me.

  6. stonelotus Says:

    when geeks attack

    each other.

  7. 4AM Says:

    You know, have a sense of humor, laugh about it. Blast 10 Zen Monkeys on your own site. Post a retort. Now you have not only humiliated you several more times over, but they OWN a video of you, and everyone on the internet thinks you are a huge asshat. You will never live this down. Assuming anything else I read about you is true, you are a sick sad little man.

    And people on craigslist want to take dumps on your chest.


  8. Dustin Says:

    While watching the video, I began wondering if he purposely shaved his face except juuust under his nose, leaving him with a **ahem** “Chaplin” mustache.

  9. danjo1 Says:

    Dustin: That’s the same thing I thought.

  10. the invisible temple » Blog Archive » Michael Crook seems a little insincere Says:

    […] Internet pariah Michael Crook has posted his court-ordered apology video, in what seems like an insincere gesture of contrition for his string of bogus DMCA notices. Even while delivering a video apology “to all bloggers, webmasters and other individuals” as par… […]

  11. Tucker Max Says:

    Sometimes, the good guys do win.

    And for the record, I didn’t use my contacts to make sure he didn’t pass the bar–the kid violated all sorts of ethics guidelines himself. I just promised to make sure the right people knew this when he does try to pass the bar. It’s all in the call out thread.

  12. Thomas Hawk Says:

    Congrats guys and thanks for fighting the good fight.

  13. Kent Thomas Says:

    Hi, I’m a Fag! Even though I’m hated by over half the educated world because I love someone. Those around me respect me because of my ethics. Its sad to say Mr. Crook still has more rights than I do.

  14. An Army of 1 in 10 » Blog Archive » Michael Crook’s latest antics Says:

    […] he has been forced to accept a settlement agreement with 10 Zen Monkeys and the Electronic Freedom Foundation. I’ll let the two links speak for […]

  15. wilhelm Says:

    “Some day, with luck, Crook will get hit by a Mack truck.”

    do people really just say things like this and not understand how horrifying it is?

    let’s play a little game of “paraphrase”

    “take down my picture by law!”

    “that’s such a rude thing to do I HOPE HE DIES BY VIOLENCE”

  16. Kent Says:

    I see. So, Once again I am denied from participating in society. Thank You for making that so obvious. All your talk about freedom of speech was a bunch of crap!

  17. some guy Says:

    Both sides are pathetic.
    Just shows how people use the internet as a substitute for real life, and waste loads of time on it, working out their neuroses in public.
    Unfortunately, the internet has finally given a voice to obsessive/compulsive computer geeks, who channel the frustration of a lack of quality pussy, into trying to destroy each other.
    You’re both sad examples of the downward spiral of the human condition.

  18. Lost! » DMCA Faker Apologizes To World Says:

    […] will stop going out and he will pull all the DMCA complaints he wrote. Check out the full story at 10 Zen Monkeys. Even if you don’t know who Michael Crook is or what this is about, it’s a nice read as […]

  19. Misuse the DMCA… at Maszman Speaks! Says:

    […] …get punished by having to record a “Dear Internet, I’m Sorry” video. […]

  20. Jacques Mattheij Says:

    Good work guys, really. The DMCA is a real pain in the behind and the more people point out the flaws in it the better.

    The only thing I’m worried about is that they won’t repeal it but replace it with an ‘improved version’…

    best regards,


  21. LindaSoG Says:

    Good job. When he sent me the withdrawal of his DMCA Notice, he couldn’t resist throwing a little bit of anti-semitism my way.

  22. Abdul Al-Felashis Says:

    Theres nothing wrong with surprise sex, or ‘rape’ as it is unfortunately called. That underage woman experienced the joys of sex without the trouble of finding a boyfriend- i think every woman wishes she would be so lucky. Not that I’m defending this failure’s trolling attempt- he fails it in a way that many of us did not consider possible.

  23. Abdul Al-Felashis Says:

    Surpise sex is fun for both parties and always justified. That young woman got to enjoy the pleasures of sex without the trouble of finding a bofriend… I think we all wish we could be so lucky. Not that I’m defending this failure’s trolling attempt- he fails in a way that many of us did not consider possible.

  24. pearlcaster_007 Says:

    From everything I’ve read so far, it sounds to me like this guy might be a compulsive liar.

    If that were true, then it’s not his fault per se that he’s making all these outrageous claims and trying to get attention. That’s just what happens with this type of illness.

    He brings up some good points in this video, namely about being able to control your own image– this is a serious issue that isn’t satisfactorily addressed under existing copyright, IMHO.

    By making this into such a big deal, you’re just encouraging him – as you yourself said, just ignore him. You’ve practically turned him into some sort of goliath or dark hero. Oooooh no! He submitted a false copyright takedown notice– how horrible. He’s not the satan against free speech for goodness’ sake.

    The guy just wanted a picture of himself taken down. By ridiculing him and reposting it to such an extent, I think you’re actually damaging the plight of the individual on the Internet. Do you really want to encourage the idea that individuals cannot control their own image on the Internet? Regardless of the semantics of the situation, I don’t think it’s a great idea in our age of copyright brouhahas to be uniting together to collectively shit on an individual that just wanted his picture taken off. Who gives a fark if he seems like he’s an asshat? He’s just some guy. We should be uniting against the big corporations when they aim to take unreasonable control over their copyrights over images of us. I don’t see how this issue hasn’t strengthened the position of big companies with respect to their ability to control your image.

    When you realised the takedown notice was false, you shoulda just sent an FOD letter and shut up about it. Why is this so fricking newsworthy? I just don’t get it. This doesn’t seem like the right issue to make a stand on with respect to free speech.

  25. theGeneral Says:

    I live in Syracuse and am totally embarrased that this moron is from my town.

  26. Marshall Says:

    Did you release the video under Creative Commons, since the rights were assigned to you?

    Seems like that would be poetic justice.

  27. Well Says:

    He’s right in his fox video, soldiers didnt give us our rights.

    Soldiers didnt pen the constitution.

    Soldiers didnt divise the concepts of rights.

    Politicians and statesmen did.

    Soldiers are a tool, soldiers historically fight for whomever will pay them.

    To say soldiers gave rights is a fundemental misunderstanding of a soldier’s role in a society, historically, and in the USA.

    Soldiers do what they’re told.

  28. Jeff Diehl Says:

    CC License: Non-commercial, Attribution, Share-Alike.

    Let the remixes begin!

  29. ErikD Says:

    Thanks, Michael Crook, for having the inspiration or just dumb luck to be simultaneously both unbelievably irritating AND unbelievably incompetent, and thereby providing us all with

    a kind of online seminar, reminding web surfers to stand up to copyright law abusers, and to never pay attention to the Michael Crooks of the world.

    Better than any lawyer, Michael Crook, either through astonishing levels of social retardation or Kaufmannesque pretense, has given us yet another opportunity to let us know that just as ‘soldiers’ didn’t give us our rights, neither do those same rights depend on his whims.

  30. DreamHost Blog Says:

    Dealing With A DMCA Crook

    Along with dealing with the various spammers and fraudsters who manage to find their way onto our servers, one of the issues we deal with pretty regularly is copyright infringement. People storing, distributing or downloading cracked computer games, pu…

  31. 5150 Says:

    Considering Michael Crook’s online career arc, his “protecting my identity” argument is IMPOSSIBLE to take seriously. 10Zen is going overboard with this, but Crook isn’t in a million years worth defending. Your sympathy and armchair psychiatry are too good for this Fortuny wannabe.

  32. hork Says:

    no no no no! no remixes! he craves the attention! we must deny him the oxygen of publicity!

  33. holywood Says:

    The mustache wasn’t a mistake:

    from the message boards on his site:

    “Sure, the “apology” video sucked, but at least I got to write most of the script, and even got the ol’ Hitler soup strainer in there as a statement.”

  34. Zac Echola is muffin but trouble Says:

    […] This is the worst pissing match in the history of the internet. Aptly namend Michael Crook lured would-be pedophiles on craiglist in typical Dateline fashion. 10zenmonkeys wrote a blog post criticizing him and his appearance on Hannity and Colmes and they posted a screen grab of his likeness from FOX News. […]

  35. Blurgle Says:

    Did he say the girl was underage? And he lives in Syracuse, NY, close to the Canadian border?

    I’m wondering because I don’t believe there is a statute of limitations on underage sexual assault in Canada. You can charge the perpetrator 50 years in the future.

    Course, it’s likely just more attention-whoring.

  36. Randwulf Says:

    He must strive for some kind of internet celebrity and/or notoriety because he can’t make it in the real world with that odd voice and misshapened head.

    Does anybody know if someone laid down a severe boot-stomping on his face at some point? If so, I feel badly that he may have paid good money for such a poor job of reconstructive surgery. If not, then I feel badly for what appears to be the swelling of his brain through the top of the left side of his skull which may likely be causing his erratic behaviour.

    Poor guy.

  37. Pick of the Herd: Michael Crook at Herd Watching Says:

    […] Long story short, he got his ass handed to him when the EFF and 10 Zen Monkeys took him up on the challenge and beat him soundly in court. As part of the settlement he was required to make an apology video and comply with certain other restrictions. […]

  38. Worrymon Says:

    In response to this: “He brings up some good points in this video, namely about being able to control your own image” this is a serious issue that isn’t satisfactorily addressed under existing copyright, IMHO.”
    I have to say: “If he didn’t want his image used, he should have stayed off of TV. Two things happened when he appeared on TV. 1, he gave the right to use his image to the TV network to use as they decide. 2, he made himself a public figure.

  39. 5150 Says:

    He also, by any reasonable ethical standard, declared himself fair game when he started randomly fucking with strangers and violating their privacy on his “Craigslist perverts” website. He’s not “making a point.” He’s just throwing his food on the floor and then crying because it’s too dirty to eat. There’s a difference between a gadfly and a piece of shit.

  40. Mike S. in Vancouver, USA Says:

    Despite the apology, he’s posted an off-the-record video of himself that shows he’s not learned his lesson, and he’s started yet another website of misinformation for it.

  41. Ronny B Says:

    I actually feel a little sorry for this guy. He was attention seeking and it backfired. I also feel a bit sorry for him since he actually believed that he had the rights he claimed according to DMCA. Well guess he learnt his lesson.

  42. RMCD Says:

    Crook by name, crook by nature.

  43. Franny Ward Says:

    I am happy for Jeff and 10 Zen Monkeys for getting a victorious judgment against Michael Crook. Unfortunately, the ruling seems to be on the “Fox News” picture, not the one that I had on my blog. My internet provider was sent two DCMA complaints month’s apart, one for posting information about him and one for posting the picture. My web site was shut down twice. Crook and his (wife) Kayla kept up the intimidation by contacting my advertisers with a claim that it would not be in their best interest to be associated with my web site. Several advertisers asked me to drop their links to them.

    I also contacted the EFF, without a response of any real value.

  44. Andrew Preston Says:

    I’m sure you’re done with the Michael Crook story, but I thought I’d share this gem.

    I posted on his forum what I thought was a decent expression of free speech based on his second Youtube video where he says that the owner of 10zenmonkeys has mental health issues and other questionable comments.

    I went back to check on the flood of comments I’m sure my expression would bring and found that I was permabanned. The reason?

    “Dissenting opinion against he who is Michael Crook”

    Yeah. He’s totally not ready for forgiveness.

  45. Emily Says:

    Congratulations, Jeff and the EFF! Your punishment of Crook hurt him in ways he will never admit. You don’t have to look too far between the lines to see he is thoroughly pwned. One of his shortcomings is his transparency. You know when he’s lying because he tells the lie and then immediately denies it.

    Andrew preston, I’ve been permanently banned from his site for pointing out some of his scams. Previous to that, he edited my comments to support his views. Oh well, I have an opinion piece on my blog that he can’t change.

  46. Fabian Says:

    Justice is served! Big ups to Jeff Diehl and the EFF for seeing this through this end. The video is a wonderful touch. This guy looks completely pained to have to make this apology video. I mean, you could almost hear his internal organs liquefying as he speaks into the camera. I love it!

    I personally do not accept his apology. Although I didn’t receive a DCMA notice from him for posting his picture on my blog, I was appalled and insulted by his DCMA-happy behavior even before I read the racist, anti-Semetic, and homophobic rants on his website.

    Now, if we could only light some torches, smoke him out of his rathole, and put him out of his misery the world would be a better place. However, this is a good start.

  47. I Didn't Know Says:

    I thank this website and Emily for exposing this guy as to who he really is.

    What’s sad is that he spends so much time blasting homosexuals, yet he goes and does this on a weekly basis:


    I’m ashamed to say I met him on Craigslist and we had some encounters. He seemed like a nice, normal guy, and then I read an article about him in the local paper today and decided to Google. Boy am I glad I learned the truth.

    I wish he wouldn’t hide his true preference though…it’s nothing to be ashamed of.

  48. Emily Says:

    For the record, “I Didn’t Know” above is our old buddy Michael Crook. He sent me the same message using the sock puppet “Dave”. One problem, he used the same gmail account that he sent all the fraudulent DMCA notices with. I have a comment on my blog today about it.

  49. I Didn't Know Says:

    Emily hasn’t read her e-mail.

    This was already explained to her. Mike used my e-mail account, with and apparently a few times without my consent to send these DMCA notice things.

    That said, there is proof on the internet of what I am saying, and I am certain it will make its way here shortly….being his boyfriend, (not for much longer, but he doesn’t know that) I have pics that prove he’s not as straight as he claims….so, Emily, I’m afraid, fails to check facts prior to posting them.

    It’s okay, though..the truth is coming out, so to speak.

  50. snackerbass Says:

    what an ugly dude… and he doesn’t know how to shave properly either what a nerd.

  51. Video: “Dear Internet, I’m Sorry”-Michael Crook, Apologizes To Everyone He's Harassed « Bannaga Says:

    […] Read the full article on 10 Zen Monkeys. […]

  52. thetallcool1 Says:

    This guy just doesn’t know when to quit, does he? The whole time I was reading this, I was thinking, “what a tool”, and then the first post I read identifies him the same way. Apparently, the universal concensus is, “this guy is a real freakin’ tool”. Wow…….

    As to whether he is gay or not, who cares? That has no bearing on his public persona. What he IS, is an attention whore. The only way that he can feel better about his own pathetic life is to bag on other people and try to humiliate them in front of others. We all knew people like this in high school, the difference being that they all grew out of it, where as this guy did not.

    It almost makes me want to feel sorry for him…….nah, the hell with him.

  53. Jose Says:

    Hmmm, so Crook , without permission, took control of an internet account (ofhis girlfriend/boyfriend) and send out DMCA notices in the name of a wife that does not exist? This guy could be in more trouble than he could imagine. Since his wifes name is (was) Beth, but he claims it was Kayla that sent the DMCA notices.

    Oh well, not the first time he claimed to be his own wife/girlfriend/lover/supporter.(all the same person.) I am sure that it will happen again… Oh how many holes there are, that can be poked in his stories… He needs a publicist just to help him keep them straight (no pun intended.)

  54. Emily Says:

    Hi, Jose(Michael). Give it up. When you have to pad the comment areas to stir up (phony) controversy about yourself, your 15 minutes are over.

  55. M. Fox Says:

    I am wondering..when someone does send a DMCA notice, doesn’t the person have to be real and prove proper ID on who he/she is, if questioned?

    It has been brought to my attention that just last January, someone recieved a DMCA notice on a personal photo of Crook.Further viewing said DMCA notice the email is to a gmail account that Crook has used for himself and as other names claiming to know him, yet the signature was signed Scott Delaney.

    BTW-The link that goes to said photo is to the one nekked photo Crook sent out in the past to Flawfan using his old eastcoastdude2004 yahoo account. That same photo crook swore up and down was a fake. So the question is, if that photo is a fake and it IS NOT Crooks property,why was Crook sending out DMCA notices on it?!

    Another past one that was sent out, the name was Kayla, claining to be Crooks wife (which was a lie).Wouldn’t this fall under false statements even though it is Crook himself sending them out?

    Maybe we should start a list on the names he has used on the DMCA sends so others will know if it is legit or not.

  56. Jose Says:

    Been around long following Crook, Emily? I didn’t think so. Might want to run that theory by M.Fox. I have a few of my own… In fact, your comments pretty much solidified it for me.

  57. Emily Says:

    I am well aware of Mama Fox.

  58. Emily Says:

    If I have created an enemy where I might have had an ally, then I mourn my loss. Michael Crook has more aliases than Heinz has varieties, so I will continue to be cautious.

  59. teva_feet Says:

    So Michael Crook (what an appropriate last name) gets pwned by everyone* else on the internt. Have to admit that originally had only followed the story as an offshoot to the Jason Fortuny (there’s another androgynous asshole) CL scam but have to admit that the Michael Crook/10 Zen Monkeys saga is far more ammusing and thrilled that Jeff took this pantie waste of a human to task. More thrilled with the outcome!

    *poetic license, I’m sure there are some other wankers out there who are part of Crook’s fan club

  60. badalki Says:

    Is he growing a hitler moustache?

  61. Diablo Says:

    I first learned of the guy while serving on a carrier in the gulf around the time of his FOX appearance. The guy is just scamming for money. What was really annoying is that he took money from vets to buy his forsakethetroops site and he just proceeded to turn around and make another site. I have no problem with people with unpopular views, hell I spent 2 years in a war I didn’t support, but what is so irritating about the guy is he’s like a 5 year old screaming swear words in a church. He doesn’t frame his opinions in any meaningful fashion. Really pathetic are his youtube videos that end with him begging people to go to his site yet he silents the opinions on his site so people immediately stop going there. If he”s going to say crap to piss people off and generate buzz about his sites, he should allow people to vent. He doesn’t seem to understand how to really run a site pass fluff. He’s a sad guy that would never generate a story except for the internet and Fox News.

  62. Crook Not Says:

    publish his address, not nessarily here on this thread but spread it around like he does anomously elsewhere.

  63. V LaRoche Says:

    Wow, what a lot of wasted energy. Here we have a national AG replacing attorneys who don’t toe the Party line, and this limp little blog is getting its rocks off over . . . what, exactly? Just shows the priorities of the Rabid Right.

  64. Jeff Diehl Says:

    how DARE you commit the doublecrime of questioning the integrity of our beloved administration AND insulting this limp little blog! you are surely going to a rung of hell where the red-eyed overlords shall nail your scrotum to a plank and yank your innards out through your pupenschute.

  65. What a douche Crook is Says:

    I pray that Crook gets what he deserves. Every vet who put his or her life on the line fo this country and for Crook’s freedoms, in my opinion, has the right to smack him in his fucking face. In my opinion, every person that lost loved ones in the holocaust has the right to spit in his ugly face. He should be in a mental hospital. Where is a crazy, heavily armed, vietnam vet when you really need one? I hope that one day I get the chance to take a piss on his grave.

  66. Gotta Be Kidding Says:

    Want to know what is really funny. Grown men acting like children. Oh, let me take that back. Grown.. prideful…arrogant men acting like children.

    There’s the power of my free speech!

  67. Copyright Troll Apologizes Says:

    […] Let this be a warning to all copyright trolls: filing frivolous copyright claims carries legal consequences. That’s why the aptly-named copyright troll Michael Crook was forced to make this video apology in an out-of-court settlement with the blog 10 Zen Monkeys. […]

  68. Jaqui Says:

    This won’t be the last spurious action before the US Courts.
    The “Litigation happy” USA will see to that.*
    Which will, in time, kill the “Social Networking” aspects of Web 2.0

    * The daytime TV in the USA has how many “Court” shows? where people are suing for damages? ( after the production company makes sure it isn’t completely spurious )
    SCO started the ball rolling with their lawsuit activities, we all know how foolish SCO is, why would we expect any single person to be any smarter?

  69. Five ways to build and defend your reputation online at Demand Satisfaction! Says:

    […] People are typically generous towards others who demonstrate a willingness to take risks, make mistakes, and even fail. On the other hand, a history of poor character is not so easily forgotten. There’s justice in this structure. Good people get the slack they deserve, while the the bad guys are cooked in their own juices. […]

  70. Demand Satisfaction!: Five ways to build and defend your reputation online « Identity Unknown Says:

    […] People are typically generous towards others who demonstrate a willingness to take risks, make mistakes, and even fail. On the other hand, a history of poor character is not so easily forgotten. There’s justice in this structure. Good people get the slack they deserve, while the the bad guys are cooked in their own juices. […]

  71. Skary Josh Roberts Says:

    “… I hope he dies by violence!!!” LOL, that’s great! I’m in the Army and I hope he dies at the hands of the AL Qeda!!! Or even Suni Rebels!!! What an Ass Monkey! He’s an insincere sad little person and makes me sad that I chose to fight for his rights to be stupid, but that’s what we do as soldiers. We defend the Freedom to be Stupid, sometimes.

  72. Musings on self-publishing. A series. « Emily’s Rant Says:

    […] should receive compensation in the form of royalties. This belief has gotten him more than a little grief in the not too distant past. His having given up, for the moment, on that particular pipe dream, we […]

  73. cory Says:

    crook is a scumbag for everything that hes ever said he wants to talk so much shit but then hes a lil bitch and appoligized and man he is one ugly mother fucker

  74. The Internet’s 10 Most Hated People — ty.rannosaur.us Says:

    […] is the dick bank where Scrooge McCock swims around in an endless sea of dicks. He is best known for using DMCA takedown notices to harass bloggers that mocked his appearance on Fox News to defend Forsake the Troops, a site that claims troops are […]

  75. Screw You Says:

    OMG! This guy is soooo ugly…eeek!

  76. DMCA takedown misuse: two cautionary tales « lightbucket Says:

    […] “Dear Internet, I’m Sorry”, Lou Cabron, 10 Zen Monkeys, March 14, 2007 […]

  77. Who is Michael Crook? – Muskblog Says:

    […] and generally try to cover up the fact he is a huge douche bag to use the parlance of our time.  10 Zen Monkeys is one of the websites that fought him in court, they were directly involved, I merely commented and observed, but it didn’t stop Michael […]

Leave a Reply